preview

In the past, research often examined child and adolescent popularity levels and their relation to

Good Essays

In the past, research often examined child and adolescent popularity levels and their relation to peer group affiliation, developmental outcomes, and a host of other variables. Recent literature has however established a variation within the concept of popularity that challenges past research regarding its effects and characteristics. Popularity is now understood to encompass two different constructs: sociometric popularity and perceived popularity. Sociometric popularity is described as representing a person’s level of overall likeability, and sociometric popular peers are frequently described as kind, trustworthy, and dominant, but not aggressive (Sandstrom & Cillessen, 2006; Parkhurst & Hopmeyer, 1998). On the contrary, perceived …show more content…

However, the construct of perceived popularity and its positive association to aggression demonstrates that the use of some aggressive behaviours can be advantageous. Perceived popular, high status youth regularly use a combination of prosocial and aggressive behaviour to gain what they want, making them socially competent as well central to peer groups (Prinstein & Cillessen, 2003; Cillessen & Rose, 2005; Hawley, Little & Card, 2007). Thus, perceived popularity and its related aggression are not necessarily negative, and have been positively associated to group dominance, social competence, and high quality adjustment (Prinstein & Cillessen, 2003). Despite the vast amount of research concerning the connection between perceived popularity, its related high status, and aggression, there have been very few longitudinal studies looking at the possible antecedents and consequences of perceived popularity. There have been plethora of studies relating perceived popularity to increases in levels of peer reported aggression, but due to methodology it is unknown whether these increases in aggression are actual or if they are a result of peers viewing perceived popular peers as increasingly aggressive over time. Sandstrom and Cillessen (2006) conducted a study which demonstrated that high levels of

Get Access