Incivility And Sociality : The Loss Of Civility In The Internet

Anonymous posting provides an opportunity for social media users to reveal “honest expression, unencumbered by identity” (Poole). The ability to remain anonymous directly affects users’ online behavior to inevitably portray an extension of their offline persona, yet it also enables the choice to make claims on an identity that differs from reality. When individuals hide behind the mask of electronic anonymity, they can take the role of a cyberbully with the intention to aggravate and distress victims, which demonstrates their moral disengagement toward the feelings of other individuals. Despite the fact that anonymity fosters a “unique sense of community . . . that embraces and encourages freedom of thought [, social media sites such as 4chan have] completely raw and unfiltered discourse” (Poole). The social media site, 4chan, is an online messaging board where anonymous users do not have to submit personal information to be involved in it (Russon). Because it does not replicate real-world social norms by emphasizing the human qualities of conversation such as people’s faces, real names, as well as brief biographies, there is not a baseline of responsibility and thus users are willing to post without inhibition to castigation. The

In the article, "The Flip Side of Internet Fame", Jessica Bennett, the author, dives into the unflattering aspects of the internet. Some might think the internet is harmless and just a fun way to communicate, but for some people such as the "star war kid", it was a devastating part of their life.  Something that is clear through the numerous examples she gives, is the internet can be humiliating, damaging, hard to regulate and it can convey lies. Two other point she makes is that public shaming is becoming much more popular and the internet can lead to devastating repercussions and trauma.

Perhaps one of the most instrumental factors in the increasingly problematic adult misogynistic cyber-bullying scenarios is that each individual participating in the harassment is able to do so anonymously. Anonymity allows the online participants of misogynistic cyber-harassment to feel a sense of security from retribution and strips the human traits of empathy and morality from the participants. Phillip Zimbardo, a social psychologist, studies and observes the undressing of empathy and morality seen in individuals participating in anonymous activities (qtd. in Citron 58). Zimbardo concludes, “The study found that the anonymous students delivered twice as much electric shock to subjects as the non-anonymous students” (qtd. in Citron 58).

Many social media users, for example, have felt the blow of a very hurtful comment from strangers or friends hidden behind a false identity. For example, Twitter has become a venue where anyone from famous politicians, Hollywood elite, to one’s immediate family may spew out inflammatory and bombastic comments that they would never utter in a face to face encounter. This kind of startling exchange is just a sample of how toxic the Internet can be when the users are not accountable and can hide behind the screen of the internet. Due to the loss of face-to-face contact while online, some people obviously feel free to say whatever they want, and with the lack of initial personal reaction from the recipient of these remarks, the online troll feels no remorse. In the article, "Hiding Behind the Screen," Roger Scruton states, "In human relations, risk avoidance means the avoidance of accountability, the refusal to stand judged in another’s eyes, the refusal to come face to face with another person…to run the risk of rejection. Accountability is not something should avoid; it is something we need to learn.” (59). This statement makes one wonder if the cultural shift to online communication and the inevitable lack of

The role played by anonymity in facilitating inflammatory online interactions is thought to be mediated by group processes such as that of deindividuation (Festinger, Pepitone & Newcombe, 1952; Demetriou & Silke, 2003; Zimbardo, 2007), commonly described as a state of reduced self-awareness typically associated with immersion in a group (Goldstein 2002). The social identity model of deindividuation (SIDE) (Reicher, Spears & Postmes, 1995) postulates that when the members of a group are anonymous, less attention is paid to the differences between group members at an individual level, while more is paid to the common ideologies and attitudes of the group (Postmes, Spears & Lea, 1999), resulting in group polarization

With the popularization and expansion of the internet in recent years, America and other Western countries have found themselves developing into media-dominated cultures. Social media platforms, forums, and other types of online interaction are becoming primary forms of communication between people with similar or differing views, bringing political topics into daily discussion. However, the implications of such a broad and unrestrained network lead to negative outcomes. Whether it be in the form of a direct slur used on Twitter or a slight jab in a discussion board, the ongoing presence of racism on the internet cannot be denied. Although some forms may appear more indirectly, the effects are not diminished; implicit forms of racism are just as impactful as direct attacks. This paper argues that the internet serves as a carrier of racism by allowing racism to thrive through forms of racial microaggressions and cloaked websites. Toward the end of the essay, possible solutions for this issue will be discussed as well.

“The Loud, Ugly World of Online Commenting” by Benjamin West talks about the newest form of exploiting freedom of speech – online commenting. This mode of expression of speech was meant to voice opinions and critic pieces but, users have been using this mode to make nasty and rude comments. And what encourages this behavior is the anonymity, like Mike Krahulik suggests that “Normal person plus anonymity plus audience equals total dickward” when people are aware that their identities are hidden, they feel they are not responsible for the consequences of their words and feel free to be hateful. These hateful comments that individuals post in fact can have very serious consequences to the person it is addressed to and is a form of cyber bullying.

Furthermore, Boyd claims that people have a right to do what protects their well-being and says: “What’s at stake is people’s right to protect themselves, their right to actually maintain a form of control that gives them safety” According to Boyd, nobody has the right or authority to stop people from doing what protects them the most. Any action to stop people from protecting themselves is wrong and that’s exactly what the ban of anonymity calls for. Boyd holds the same idea as Stafford and Zhou that people need to be protected from these “trolls” on the internet but unlike the other authors, Boyd sees anonymity as the defensive measures that people take to protect themselves. Without anonymous accounts and names people at risk such as stalking victims, rape victims, defectors from suppressive governments, and company whistleblowers are left defenseless to people who have access to the internet and their identities and the intention to harm them. It is unreasonable to take a risk to implement something, not knowing if it will have any positive effect, but knowing it will definitely negatively effect many users of the internet. Boyd’s article explains that anonymity allows for all ideas to be fully expressed without being afraid of backlash from individuals that aim to harm you. This lack of

With the advent of the internet and the increasingly common use of computers to communicate with others (Christopherson 2007), Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) and Social Media have become imperative to study in a social psychological context. In regards to CMC, it has been postulated that the absence of social feedback and social context information might lead to uninhibited behaviour, as these gaps may not yet have been replaced by shared norms for either conveying or interpreting the social meaning of communication (Siegel, Dubrovsky, Kiesler & Mcguire 1986). We propose that the anonymity of CMC is enabling individuals who otherwise engage in normatively prosocial behaviour to engage in antisocial, antinormative behaviour. This

People’s online presence differs from their personality in real life, they feel almost invincible thanks to anonymity, like they can say anything without repercussions and consequences. In Jon Ronson’s book, “So You’ve Been Publically Shamed”, he examines 4 people who have had their lives ruined by online harassment via social media platforms, with virtually no repercussions for the online shamers. The problem with internet is the mass amounts of threats sent and received everyday, which proves that our online citizenship should

Since the dawn of economics, markets have been the routine place to go for the purchase and sale of goods for humanity. However, with ever growing technology, particularly during the 21st Century, these market meeting places have shifted to a new frontier - cyberspace. With the advent of the Internet, humanity now had a new area to communicate through - whether it was used as a market, or simply as a pathway through which you could meet with new people. However, negative connotations came with the Internet. Coming from personal experience, people, especially those in the online gaming world, potentially become more rude, snarky, and obscene to people in the real world, as they are usually used to acting the same way with the protection

For the past decade or so there has been a considerable shift in the way we communicate with each other; instead of speaking face-to-face, we prefer to stay in touch by way of a Facebook post or Tweet. Social media dominates our life whether we’re using it, or not. However, not all online dissonance has been healthy and civil. The internet has seen a rise in the number of trolls and predators that lurk the dark corners of the Internet. Threats, and heinous insults flood media networks like Reddit and Snapchat. Online predators who fling insults are enamored by the internet’s alluring anonymity and can’t give it up. Like Christine Rosen says in her article called, “In the Beginning Was the Word,” “technology has introduced new words, changed the meaning of others, and has even introduced new forms of language and communication” (230). The evolutionary trend and prevalence of people intentionally offending others online has led to a

Hiding one’s identity Is nothing new. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay authored The Federalist Papers in 1787 under pseudonym Publius. The ability to communicate anonymously is viewed as part of our basic right to free speech . With the advent of computers and ease of access to the internet, becoming anonymous as never been easier, and is far more reaching than the colonial newspapers of 1787. For some this ease at which we can communicate anonymous is cause for concern. Although we are no longer hiding our identities to promote the ratification of the Constitution, being anonymous still plays a large role in our society. Online anonymity grants anyone with an internet connection an unbiased voice, regardless of gender, race, or wealth. Without this freedom to online anonymity many people would not feel free to express themselves or release sensitive information about themselves or about corruption, in the case of whistleblowing. Anonymity can also be used as a security measure and prevent unauthorized mining of personal information. Although multiple ethical framework will be used and compared, using a consequence based framework will be the main examining point throughout.

Discriminatory behavior on the Internet is an interesting and challenging topic. But what makes it interesting also makes it a particularly demanding topic to write upon because, although there are many avenues of research topics to be investigated upon, there is only a very limited amount of existent research to draw upon for a literature review of the topic. None the less, a maturing framework for the study of intergroup communication on the Internet is developing and maturing. While the internet represents an advancement in the age of information technology, relevant precedents of major communicative innovations must also be explored so that the Internet as a communication context can be better understood. Therefore, the study of the

The changes in American culture through the internet have generally been very extensive; however, the average American might not see that the changes have been exceptionally negative for the United States as a whole. Aside from the positive aspects that the internet made possible, such as easier access for education, the anonymity and privacy allotted to internet users in the United States plays a key role when it comes to the negative aspects arising in American culture. Anonymity creates a realm through the internet where the consequences of words, photos, videos, et cetera are typically overlooked. The level of anonymity that one possesses on the internet reduces the level of social regulation between four different types of communication online: full anonymity, pseudonymity, visual anonymity, and face-to-face (Keipi 1099). When one understands that social regulation roughly means one’s applied use of social norms, internet anonymity can be understood as a Pandora’s box that unintentionally depreciates what society values. Much like Pandora, allowing unregulated anonymity on the internet will continue to lead to greater issues that no one can easily erase. According to a Pew Research Center poll conducted by Lee Rainie and others, a majority of Americans greatly value personal privacy over transparency on the internet (1). Despite the fact that most value their privacy above other options, the solution to combating political polarization, ethnic discrimination, and online