Increased Interdependence in the East Asian Community Essay example

“In recent years, the United States has reaffirmed its desire and determination to be a Pacific Power” (Liu, Lisong). In order for this reaffirmation to happen, it will take open-mindedness, determination and acceptance to move our country forward in its foreign relations endeavor of today’s Asian culture. In order to begin to understand relations between the United States and modern East Asia from World War II forward, one must first fully understand and appreciate the dynamic of complexity and hardship that ravenged the region at that time.

The topics of culture, government, and military relations between the United States and China will be covered throughout this document. The opening paragraphs will introduce the reader to geographical information, the history and development, and followed by governs. The discussion on why China could and is a concern for the United States will lead to the closing.

In How Asia Works- Success and Failure in the World’s Most Dynamic Region, Joe Studwell explores the East Asian developmental successes of Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and China by challenging the prominent theory of developmental economics. He uses the same theory to examine the lagging behind of Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines. Studwell evaluates the performance of these economies by a recipe he has concocted in which he explains as, “an historical review of east Asian economic development shows that the recipe for success has been as simple as one, two, three: household farming, export-oriented manufacturing, and closely controlled finance that supports these two sectors (Studwell 267).” The first stage requires land reforms

The Sino-Soviet confrontation of the 1960’s-1980’s had a significant impact on the Cold War dynamics of the Asia-Pacific through a number of factors. This period was a significant time of the twentieth century. The two largest communist states of the world, the PRC (Peoples Republic of China), led by Mao Zedong and the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics), led by Nikita Khrushchev; ceased their strong ties through the Sino Soviet Split and then confrontation. A critical analysis of the Sino-Soviet split and confrontation will administer a greater understanding of the various alliances that formed around the Asia-Pacific region. This includes the alliance of SEATO (South East Asian Treaty Organisation), as well those that formed during conflicts between the 1960’s and 1980’s. The two decades, in which the Sino-Soviet relationship was on a brink of a border war, was a time filled with many conflicts, of particular note, the Vietnam War. This conflict was especially significant and will be discussed further to highlight the effect on the Asia-Pacific.

From an international relations perspective, the Taiwan Strait, one of the most likely conflict zones in the Asia-Pacific region, has been dubbed the “Balkan Peninsula of the East.” The status of Taiwan has been one of the most intricate issues in international relations arena for the past decades. The Taiwan question is essentially an extension of the “two Chinas” problem, which creates a dilemma for accommodating

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has become more integrated and willing to cooperate within the global political and economic systems than ever in its history. However, there is growing apprehension in the Asia-Pacific region and the U.S. in regards to the consequences of rising in economic and military power in China. Descriptions about Chinese diplomacy in the policy and scholarly are less positive lately concerning China’s obedience to regional and international rules. There was little debate in the U.S. and elsewhere in regards to whether China was or was not part “the international community.” Scholars and experts in the early 1990s have contended

China has one of world’s largest populations and, in the last few decades, the world’s fastest economic growth. Large numbers of other major Western countries compete to invest and collaborate with China. However, due to the cultural differences and language barriers between Eastern and Western countries, issues often arise and can lead to conflicts if cautionary steps are not taken. This essay will discuss some issues, causing factors, theories and strategies related to an article taken from

When any student from rural America thinks of Asia, they think of two countries—China and Japan. China was called the Middle Kingdom in ancient and medieval times, and for good reason. Its influence stretch out across Asia, even reaching the consciousness of Rome, eventually winding its tendrils around Japan. However, once industrialization blossomed across Europe and North America and catapulted imperialism into prominence, China and Japan’s futures transformed, each as different from each other as night is from day. In response to foreign domination between c. 1750 and c. 1900, China and Japan still maintained similar cultures, but took extremely different approaches to politics and economics.

To accelerate the economic growth, social progress and cultural development in the region through joint endeavors in the spirit of equality and partnership in order to strengthen the foundation for a prosperous and peaceful community of Southeast Asian Nations;

Since 1980s, international relations has had complicated and profound changes, among which the political complexion between countries is significantly faded. In particular, with the speeding of economic globalization and regional economic integration, the important role of economic force is gradually highlighted in the world’s political and economic relations. In recent years, China and Russia, as two of the most important emerging economies, have maintained relatively even economic growth under the whole international economic conditions, resulting in the increasingly important roles in the international society. In addition, China and Russia have maintained good bilateral relationship for more than 20 years, which has become one of the

Throughout Southeast Asia, there are a number of relationships between state actors that are marked by mutual distrust, and these bilateral relationships fuel the arms race within Asia due to security concerns. These distrustful relationships between nations have “their root causes in historical animosities, racial and religious divisions or competition for influence and resources” (Richardson 1990: 24). Problematic relations in the region include, and are not limited to: North and South Korea, Taiwan and China,

Countries like Australia and Turkey which are on the periphery of Asia are hankering to be part of the Asian growth story. China will soon surpass the US in terms of GDP. Indonesia, India, Iran, Turkey and Japan are the major players of the resurgence story. Though the US has launched Asia as Pivot strategy to perpetuate hegemony, Asian nations are cutting the cord of global hegemony. The dollar has been replaced from the East Asian region as the dominant reference currency and the Asianisation of Middle East oil trade is further replacing the role of the dollar from intra-Asian trade. The world is moving towards a tripolar global monetary system. The rise of Asia is multi-dimensional. Asia is fast catching the US in research and technology. The goal of this book is to deliberate over the multifarious dimension of this complex change and elucidate how the post-western age would turn out to be a Kantian world of “perpetual peace” and a new diplomatic vocabulary might discourage the emergence of any belligerent hegemon.

In his speech at a United Nations (UN) meeting in 2001, former Secretary-General of ASEAN Roldofo Certeza Severino, Jr had labelled Southeast Asia as “fractured” at the time of ASEAN’s founding – where each member state was either pre-occupied with domestic conflicts or embroiled in some form of territorial dispute with its neighbouring countries. It

In this paper, I shall provide you with important and detailed information, entailing who ASEAN-India is, how ASEAN-India was founded, why there was a need for ASEAN-India, and what type of business conducted, along with its contributing countries. This paper will further discuss each agreement that was signed into effect, to include The Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Cooperation, The Trade in Goods Agreement, Trade in Services Agreement, and the Investment Agreement. Each agreement is centered on ASEAN-India Free Trade Area. Once reading this paper, one will gain a comprehensive understanding as to how ASEAN-India came to be and what each above-mentioned category represents.

ASEAN was officially founded in August 1967 when five founding member states jointly signed the Bangkok declaration. Since then ASEAN experienced number of threats, such as security threat in cold war, economic and financial threat in 1997 East Asia Economic crisis, and now being in the security dilemma between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, prominent major powers attempting to dominate the region, despite all the threat, ASEAN set its goal to become a community in December 2015 which has lot of potential to contribute to the world stage but it also has countless number of challenges, mainly caused by its diversities, nationalism and lack of