Information Security Standards For An Organization

There are three primary goals for an information security metrics program: compliance with legal requirements; reduce risk by adding new or improving existing capabilities; improve efficiency or reduce cost. In order to achieve any of these goals it is extremely important to gather the appropriate data and formulate useful metrics. The need for useful security metrics cannot be overstated, but there can be confusion about what a metric is, and difficulty determining what a useful metric is. As a business USAA has a duty to protect and improve shareholder investments, and of course must comply with all applicable laws and regulations. There are a variety of laws and regulations that dictate security requirements for financial institutions.

When you have a low grade the CIO of the agency’s may have to talk to congress to let them know what is going on with the agency’s The office of management and budget ( OMB) it may delay or may even cancel funding to this agency. When you talk about FISMA it was created under title lll of the E- Government act of 2002. This act requires federal agencies to give the public access to various government agencies system and data . In each of the agency will implement the policies and all of the procedures and to may sure that it is cost – effectively reduce IT security risk to an acceptable level. The IRS IT system challenge: provide desired level of public access while keeping confidential data. Federal agency security managers spend approximately 45 percent of their time on compliance issues managers with budgets more than 10 million to spend and 27 percent of their time is spend on compliance issues .The NIST computer security division has proposed the following nine steps, process for increasing the security of federal agency IT system. These are the nine steps to achieving FISMA

vii) Any other information, marked or otherwise identified in a contract as subject to safeguarding or dissemination limitation required by law, regulation, or government policy, including proprietary business information and technical information such as specifications should be protected as per compliance with Federal Information Security Modernization Act(FISMA) and National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST) standards.

8-13. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is responsible for recruiting and retaining a world-class workforce (Laudon & Laudon, 2017). Furthermore, they are also responsible for background investigations on prospective employees and security clearances. OPM was saddled with the old technology and weak management. The Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) audit for the fiscal year of 2014. The OPM did not maintain an inventory of systems and baseline configurations, having multiple of servers with an invalid authorization. The auditors couldn’t verify OPM’s monthly-automated vulnerability scanning program for all servers. OPM lacked an effective multifactor authentication strategy and had poor management of user rights. Furthermore, they had inadequate monitoring of multiple systems, many unpatched computers, and a decentralized

(International Organization for Standardization) ISO 9000, Quality Management Systems is a series of standards which outline how an organization may create and sustain an effective quality assurance system. The standards offer direction to organizations that want to ensure their services and products consistently meet customer

The first part of this paper framed FISA in its historical context. The 1978 Act initially enacted dealt only with electronic surveillance. It provided a statutory framework for collection of foreign intelligence information through the use of electronic surveillance of communications of foreign powers or agents of foreign powers. However, the Congress amended the act in 1995 and 1999 to provide a statutory framework for gathering foreign intelligence information through the use of electronic surveillance, physical searches, pen registers or trap and trace devices, access to business records and other tangible things. In sum, FISA grants broader authority than the Crime Control Act, but under a narrower range of circumstances. To limit the abuse of the Executive power that led to its passage, FISA also established the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts (FISC). The FISC requires the government to submit an application to obtain a surveillance warrant to a specially appointed FISA judge. Moreover, since the FISA warrant is secret, the government in order to benefit from this higher level of secrecy bears a burden of showing that there is “probable cause” to believe the target is a foreign power and that the targeted information relates to the ability of the United States to protect against spying or terrorism. However, to address changing circumstances after the terrorist attacks of September 911, Congress has repeatedly amended FISA to adapt to the fight against

The office of Information Security Services (ISS) is charged with mitigating risk through the development and maintenance of JWU’s information technology security strategy, IT policies and best practices, security training and awareness programs, ongoing risk assessments and compliance tasks. ISS strives to balance confidentiality (keeping private matters private), integrity (assuring that your information is complete and accurate) and availability (having timely and reliable access

The Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 usually known as FISMA is a United States Federal Law and its fundamental thought is that it gives a clout structure for supporting the effectiveness of data assets that holds federal operations and assets. It has brought attention in federal government towards cyber security and detailing on risk based policy for cost effective security.

The Espionage Act, enacted in 1917, is a United States federal law that prohibits interference with military operations. It prescribes punishments for disobedience as well. The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), enacted by Congress in 1986, clarifies the limitations to accessing and using a computer knowingly without authorization, defines how any information obtained in this manner can or cannot be used, and states punishments for exceeding and abusing these limitations. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978 is a United States federal law that defines procedures for electronic and physical surveillance and the collection of foreign intelligence. The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), introduced in 2015, is a proposed law in the United States which would allow Internet traffic information to be shared between the U.S. government and technology and manufacturing companies. All of these regulations are meant to allow a balance of privacy with national security in information storage systems. While these laws are in place, there is a great deal of data and technology in place to be protected from those with negative intentions, and it is necessary to enforce cyber security with other

FISMA requires federal agencies to implement a required set of processes and system controls designed to guarantee the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of system-related information. To facilitate FISMA compliance, Princeton University maintains a formal program for information security management focused on FISMA requirements, protecting the Universities IT resources. Princeton University continues to address weaknesses identified in its Plan of Action and Milestones.

ISMA (Federal Information Security Management Act) appeared when Congress understood the significance of Information Security and it included FISMA as a piece of E - Government Act of 2002.

In government businesses and agencies today, the architecture within their networks are rapidly changing and becoming more complex with new services, applications, servers, devices and connections. With the increase of vulnerabilities that can be exploited associated with the changes in the network architecture, data protection is a high priority. The government made the decision that private companies would build and own the key communication, transportation, and energy networks. Although, the networks are owned by the private sector, there is a need for the United States to protect their people from malicious attacks which include identify attack, cyber espionage and cyber acts of war. It is the government responsibility to protect the confidentially, availability, and integrity of all the data that relates to the U.S. and its people. In order to do this, the government believes they have to partake in ensuring the private sector networks are safe from unauthorized users. In this paper, I will discuss the positives and negatives of the government regulating how private industries organize or improve their cybersecurity and how they justify it.

“ISO is commonly known as ‘International Organization for Standardization’, the ISO 9001:2000 standard is used for quality systems audited by outside auditors. This standard is applicable for manufacturing companies not only for software. This standard is given based on the documentation, design, production, testing, servicing and other processes.” (Testing Excellence.com, 2009).

The International Standards Organization (ISO) produces guidelines for organizations to use as a quality management tool. ISO functions as an independent organization with no governmental ties, allowing themselves to create guidelines that are not catered more specifically to one country than another. One hundred and sixty-two national standards bodies make up its membership and they help supply experts who will share knowledge and develop international standards. These voluntary, market-relevant, and consensus-based standards are produced as a result of the identification of a global need and are compiled through the work of international experts working in conjunction with one another.

ISO 9001:2008 specifies requirements for a quality management system where an organization 1) needs to demonstrate its ability to consistently provide product that meets customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, and 2) aims to enhance customer satisfaction through the effective application of the system, including processes for continual improvement of the system and the assurance of conformity to customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.