Is A Fetus A Person? Essay

of abortion believe that unwanted pregnancies can be very stressful for women and they should have the right to make decisions about their bodies. However, abortion is seriously wrong because killing a fetus is killing a person. And obviously, death is the end of life for the fetus when the fetus should have the right to have a life just like ours. Abortion has been used to controlled fertility in

MSA #2: Mariah Neuhauser Morality Play Case: Fetal Rights and the Fetus as Person: The Case of J.D.S. In terms of the utilitarian moral theory, utilitarian moral theory considers human actions as being morally good if the end result or effect of the action is good regardless of whether or not the “means” of getting to the respective end result or effect of an action was good. In terms of the deontological moral theory, deontological moral theory considers human actions as being morally good if the

According to Warren, a fetus is not considered a person. She argues that there are two senses of human: the biological sense and the moral sense. She states that a fetus is not a human in the moral sense of things. She argues that a fetus, whatever stage of its development, satisfies none of the basic criteria of personhood, and is not enough like a person to be granted even some of the same rights on the basis of this resemblance. Warren states that a fetus’s potential personhood is not a threat

Appealing to reason rather than religious beliefs, abortion is not wrong because essentially you are not killing a person. According to Warren five conditions for personhood are consciousness (of objects and events external and/or internal to the being), and in particular the capacity to feel pain; reasoning (the developed capacity to solve new and relatively complex problems); self-motivated activity (activity which is relatively independent of either genetic or direct external control); the capacity

The Ethics and Morals of Abortion Abortion, as it is, is a method to terminate a pregnancy by removing a fetus or an embryo out of the woman’s uterus. It is one of the most controversial problematic issues that is discussed throughout the decades. The topic of abortion was considered as a social issue that soon became a political and ethical subject. Abortion have become a heated public distribute on whether its method are morally permissible or not? Individuals have voiced the benefits and disadvantages

even if a fetus is a person, abortion is still permissible when one’s risk in health/stability/happiness is threatened. I believe that any woman, who houses the fetus inside her body for estimated nine months have the right and the choice to abortion when it is for one’s health, stability and happiness for both the mother and the unborn fetus. Thomson’s argument is entitled as “Defense to Abortion“. I agree to Thomson and her argument when it comes to aborting a fetus, even if a fetus is a person

“A fetus is not a person, hence not the sort of entity which it is proper to ascribe full moral rights” (Warren 1:1). This criticizes Thomson’s argument for abortion because Thomson avoids whether the fetus is a person or not all together in her argument, which, Warren does not agree. Therefore, I will side along with Warren that if you are arguing for abortion, you cannot get around the issue of whether the fetus is a person or not. There is no proof that denies or approves that a fetus is not

life of the mother does not depend on whether the fetus is a person. This essay examines the argument to why abortion is morally permissible and defends this notion using three central impressions, to which the essay is organized by the following: first, abortion does not depend on whether the fetus is a person, because the fetus is not a person. Second, the moral permissibility of abortion cannot be exclusively contingent in defining a fetus as a person since this concept is not conclusive enough for

In “A Defense of Abortion", Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that a life is a life regardless if it was still in the fetus. Possibly the best argument that was made by Thomson was that a fetus has already been a human person long before birth. In this Paper, I will argue that this argument fails because a life should be consider living when it is “conscious”. In “A Defense of Abortion", Thomson starts by talking about what most opposition to abortion would use as a premise, that “We are asked to notice

undermined women’s freedoms on decisions making. The pro-life advocates are simply third parties who claims that they are trying to save lives; however, their earnest intentions cannot outweigh the consequences that sometimes comes with keeping the fetus. For example, a sixteen year old female became impregnated by her seventeenth year old boyfriend. Her family’s financial background exhibit that they have a low income, and same goes for her boyfriend. On top of that her family have history of drug