I think it's ok to kill a permanently ill animal is for its own benefit, so it doesn’t suffer anymore, but do you think it’s ok to kill a healthy one? The population of Giraffes has gone down 40% in 15 years due to hunting and predators. If this keeps up giraffes will be extinct in about 180 years. Giraffes have necessities which help them survive, and predators after them, but what happens when hunters get into the mix? Do you think it’s ok to kill these innocent animals?
In the wild kingdom, there are many different types of animals. But all these animals have a common goal, and that is to stay alive. To reach their goal they have to fight off any weather challenge, reproduce, and eat. When a rainstorm occurs, animals need shelter, but who will get to the shelter first? If you have a breed of an animal, to keep that breed they need to reproduce. The more animals, the more reproduction, the biggest population. A very important factor to the equation is food. Every living creature needs it if they want to stay alive. But in the wild kingdom, some animals kill other animals for food, those animals are called carnivores, and that is ok. Carnivores help balance population, so one animal's population doesn't get too high. Lions, hyenas, crocodiles, and
…show more content…
If humans know that giraffes are dying so fast they should limit giraffe slaughter for a certain season until the population rises again. I also believe that no one should be allowed to do anything that could harm one of the giraffes in a population with little as 300 giraffes left such as the West African Giraffe. I think that predators are killing giraffes at a fair rate, but there are so many types of predators that hunt giraffes that if they keep reproducing, there would be too many and little food for them. If hunters do need to kill an animal, they should kill a predator that isn't prey to any other
When herbivorous species such as white-tailed deer and elks are the main predators in a habitat, they create an imbalance in the habitat, and force other species in the habitat to go extinct. Natural predation also has a stronger impact in stabilizing or reducing the population of white-tailed deer than human hunting alone. One of the main reasons for the overpopulation of the deer was the extinction of their predators. Every animal in the food web is highly important in keeping the balance in the ecosystem. Yellowstone National Park was a great example of how every species support the
The more animals were killed, the lesser amount of animals exist, decreasing the amount of food available for people, especially settlements that rely on hunter-gathering. Through time a gradual change occurred with a switch to animal and plant domestication. More time needs to be put in to the development but once the plant and animal counts start to thrive, the end result flourishes. Domestication creates a larger food source, which can support larger populations. The food can be stored for a surplus amount creating more time for technological advancements. Diamond explains that one acre of domesticated food can feed 10-100 times more than hunter-gathers. Animal domestication can be used for pets, help with crops, and horses can contribute in battle. If a civilization didn’t switch to domestication over hunting, they probably didn’t last very
For example, the wolves have been growing a lot over the past years there are 400–450 wolves in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. They shouldn’t have wolves in Yellowstone because it will kill the other animals. We don’t want animals getting hurt or even extinct because it would be bad not being able to have enough animals. A couple hunters have been saying that they’ve never
Many people believe they are part of the strong of the world. Although they could be considered stronger than others right now, they do not realize their position on the food chain can change. “The Most Dangerous Game” gives people the idea that world is divided between the hunters and the hunted, but it also gives us the situation of when there’s a hunter versus a hunter, one is surely to lose. As the world continues to change, the idea of hunters and huntees will remain, creating skilled predators, and leaving many animals falling to
Conservationists have been particularly interested in the restoration of carnivore populations because they have a big impact on the rest of that ecosystem. One example of how carnivore population can cause issues is the decrease of the wolf population in Yellowstone Park. They killed the wolf population thinking it would help, but little did they know they were actually destroying the rest of the ecosystem. Certain ecosystem are like a car; if you remove one piece, then the entire car won’t function correctly. A decrease in carnivore populations means an increase in herbivore populations and then those organisms will use up all the possible resources in that area. That can cause many problems. It shows that the carnivores keep everything together
Wildlife is a big part of our environment. It’s a part of our food sources, clothing (wool), even our own entertainment (pets). Prey can be a good food sources for us too. For example deer and cattle, they give us meat. Meat is “the flesh of an animal as food” (dictionary.com). Sheep are great for food and clothing, their meat for food and their wool for clothes. “The fine soft curly or wavy hair forming the coat of a sheep” (dictionary.com). Animals are a huge portion of everyone’s lives.
In the ecosystem organisms rely on each other for food and protection. The Food chain is like a pyramid you have the producers, primary consumers, secondary consumers, tertiary consumers, and quaternary consumers. It’s an almost perfect balance and if any level were to just stop existing then the food chain would be destroyed. An example of organisms relying on others is an issue of isle royale were the wolves and moose population are in jeopardy. This relationship is important because without the other animal the population would die.
Horse slaughter is not humane euthanasia, while, euthanasia is defined as a gentle, painless death provided in order to prevent suffering, slaughter is a brutal and terrifying end for horses (“Horse Slaughter is not Euthanasia”). It is very shocking to hear all the awful things that horses go through in the slaughter process. When the horses are herded through the plant to slaughter, many workers use fiberglass rods to poke and beat their faces, necks, backs and legs as the animals are shoved through the facility into the kill pen (Horse Slaughter “). The USDA recently released photos of horses with broken bones protruding from their bodies, eyeballs hanging by a thread of skin, and open wounds, all taken at former U.S horse slaughter plants. This does not sound like animals that people love and have used as companion pets for many generations ( “The Horse Fund”). Former inspector has stated that horses are only stunned for 30 seconds, long enough to be hung up by a hind leg (“Jeras”) .The horse is still fully conscious at the start of the slaughter process, during which he or she is hung by a hind leg, his or her throat slit and body butchered. Death is the final step, is excruciating (“Horse Slaughter”).How does it sound okay to butcher an animal before it is even killed? Horse slaughter is a threat to human health because horses are given hundreds of drugs during their lives that have not been approved by the FDA for use in animals intended for human consumption (“ASPCA”). Horses are given medications , prescribed by vets that allows them to enter the human food chain, but yet people still consume it (“The Horse Fund”) . The slaughter process is also inherently cruel, as horses are difficult to stun properly and may be repeatedly injured or stabbed during the procedure(“How to Help a Horse”). Each year more than 100,000 American horses - working, racing and companion horses and even children’s ponies - are
Predators/prey relationships play a big role in animal populations. If the balance between predators and prey is changed, populations are changed. The white- tailed deer populations in some areas has grown too large because there are no natural predators.
Who are we to play God and decide who lives and who dies? Surely people can see that an animal’s life is just as important as a human’s life, because they are one in the same.
When we look at a wild game animal compared to one that is raised to slaughter for the
Say a frog eats a caterpillar, then a snake eats the frog, then finally a owl eats the snake. This is just a simple food chain but something called biodiversity, which means that’s there is a variety of things a that one animal can eat. An owl cant only eat a snake it could eat the frog or something smaller like a worm. This keeps form one species dying out completely, which would cause multiple species to die out. When someone releases a pet into the wild they are causing a disturbance into the wild habitat. When a python is released into a place full of crocodiles these two will start competing for food which would cause all of the lower species to start lowing in numbers faster until they become extinct which would then make the snakes and the crocodile die off too. If this keeps on happening the eventually every animal would die off!
Animals in captivity should be allowed because they can get healthy. The first reason they get healthy is there are rehabilitation programs. According to The Current, “Rehabilitation programs take ill or injured animals and nurse them to health so that they may be reintroduced back to the wild” ( Should Animals Be Kept In Captivity n. pag.). Rehabilitators learn to recognize and treat many kinds of medical and surgical problems (Duke et al. 97). Wildlife rehabilitation saves lives and returns many animals
Is the killing of animals wrong? This is an issue that is currently being argued. In the world there are people who kill animals to eat them while there are others that feel that it is inhumane to kill defenseless animals. There are many factors over which animals are killed. For example, animals that are suffering due to an illness, animals that have shown to be dangerous around us, for food, and to maintain the animal’s population balanced. Some people have argued that killing animals for food is not the only way to feed ourselves, since we produce vegetation. These people think that animals should have the same rights as humans. People feel this way because they feel that animals feel everything that we feel, such as pain, loss,
There are animal preservation groups that don’t require putting these wide ranges of species in captivity. Their sole purpose is to help injured animals or species that are going extinct, and release them back into the wild where they belong. I think that zoos should be abolished unless they change into sanctuaries where injured animals are taken in, helped, and released back into the wild immediately. Zoos would still be allowed to do this in front of public eyes. Animals should never be held captive and “research” is never an excuse. Animals can be researched while in the wild where they are in their most natural and happy state. Zoos do not do this. Zoos claim that they are helping animal species when in reality they’re hurting them and torturing animals to the point of depression and insanity. There is no justification for shooting animals when they act up because they shouldn’t be in those situations in the first place. Animal instincts should not change. Wild animals aren’t meant to be ‘tamed’ in order to provide entertainment to the public. Most zoo visitors say they don’t take away any real connection afterwards so zoos really don’t have any righteous or moral