preview

Italian And German Fascism Comparison

Better Essays

“Compare and contrast Italian and German fascism in the interwar years.”
While both Italian and German fascism in the interwar years were very similar, they were ultimately more different due to their political ideologies, foreign policies and the structure of their respective parties. Fascism, while not having a concrete definition can be defined by multiple attributes. Fascism usually consist of a ultra right wing, oppressive and authoritarian government that places a heavy emphasis on national identity. As such, fascist governments promote violence and the expansion through wars with the intent of imperialism.
Italy was the birthplace of fascism, as Benito Mussolini headed the Republican Fascist Party. Under Mussolini, Italian fascism was …show more content…

However, the German’s ideals of expansion were drastically more global than that of the Italians. While both believed that territorial expansion was a necessity for superiority, fascist Italy’s main focus of expansion was based upon that of the once powerful Roman Empire. This began with The Abyssinia Crisis of 1935, in which Italy invaded Ethiopia. The Abyssinia Crisis not only showed the pursuit from Italy towards becoming according to Overy what would be considered an empire, but also showed the lack of enforcement from the League of Nations as it pertains to collective security. British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain stated, “The circumstances in which the dispute between Italy and Abyssinian began appeared to offer an opportunity for the exercise of that policy which could hardly be more favorable for its success. The aggression was patent and flagrant, and there was hardly any country to which it appeared that a policy of sanctions could be exercised with a greater chance of success than upon Italy.” The foreign policy of Italy were explicit and began to be followed through with, due to the lack of influence from the League. So, while the Italian movement focused around becoming a “have” power and regaining their superiority though the Roman Empire, the German foreign policy revolved around the Lebensraum, or the land to …show more content…

While much of my previous knowledge of country ideology has been through historians such as Weinberg and Overy and Finaldi, I have found that the most helpful way to learn about the ideology and goals of different countries is through the use of speeches from different political leaders at the time. While the historian's point of view helps to summarize the speeches in their entirety, the speeches from the leaders allows for personal interpretation based upon the language and the events that precede it. While I have found speeches to be helpful, the limitations must still be thought of. First, many of the speeches are originally given in foreign languages, where translations are needed. These translations could change the meaning of some themes and could hinder one's ability to understand the magnitude to the language that is used in its original form. It can also be limited because much propaganda was used at the time. The speeches mostly being given to the entire country leave much room for the leader to use propaganda for the country to believe in his beliefs, rather that what the leader may be saying to his cabinet. While there is a wide range of ways to find information, it is also hard to look at secondary sources, because while they make different arguments, the arguments are based off of facts, that could be interpreted in many different

Get Access