preview

Ivory Destruction

Better Essays

Just a few decades ago, there were over 4 million elephants across the world. Today, there are fewer than 500,000. This enormous loss within the elephant population has been largely due to excessive, illegal poaching for their tusks. In the year 1989, two major revelations occurred for the elephants—first, the International Ivory Trade Ban had been accepted worldwide in hopes of slowing down the rapidly depleting elephant population. Second, Kenya’s president at the time, Daniel Arap Moi initiated the first major public act of ivory destruction. Since that year, governments have been taking their seized ivory from traffickers and either crushing or burning their stockpiles in a way that conservation groups hoped would dissuade potential black …show more content…

Governments that have begun destroying their stockpiles are attempting to send a message to the people assisting in the illegal ivory trade that their actions won’t be tolerated; still, as pure as their intentions are, destroying ivory seems to be doing the opposite of its intentions. Many people including trade experts Dan Stiles and Brendan Moyle have made warnings of the repercussions these events could bear. In fact, they describe it as a “gamble,” “A well-meaning gamble to be sure, but a gamble that could backfire — badly” (Ahmed). And evidence has shown us that this is becoming a clearer truth every day. David Daballen, a journalist for Nature, an academic journal, has found that “Intensive monitoring has revealed that more [elephants] have been poached in the past 2.5 years than in the previous 11 years” (Wittenmeyer 282). Destroying ivory may dissuade some potential black market buyers, but when ivory is destroyed in thousands and tons of pounds at once, it makes the commodity seem rarer, and in turn the black market prices begin to rise. This only means that poaching has become more and more …show more content…

This strategy may possess the potential power needed to drive the poached ivory out of business. First, the gangs who traffic and sell their ivory loots will begin to lose money once consumers realize that suddenly, ivory is not as valuable to the world as it once seemed to be. Instead, they will buy within the government market where they will be less worried about being punished for their purchases. If the economic theory holds that “destroying stockpiles of smuggled ivory reduces the amount that enters the market and thus increases the value of available stocks. This increases the expected gain from poaching and thus more poaching is bound to be the result” (Kimenyi) then, releasing legal ivory will do just the opposite and decrease the value of the poachers stockpiles, therefore leading to less incentive to kill elephants for money. Secondly, if this method is adopted, governments won’t be benefiting from the profits; these are planned to be sent to conservation efforts throughout Africa. Since many governments that are leaders of the land that elephants still exist on are poorly constructed and don’t have many reinforcements or resources on foot, the ability for governments to send profits to these African governments should be a tremendous step towards saving the elephant population and it will also make poaching harder for

Get Access