Jeff Sever Case Summary

FACTS: Douglas E. Metzger lived in an apartment in Lincoln, Nebraska. About 7:45 a.m on April 30, 1981 a residence of the apartment complex was parking his vehicle directly in front of Metzger’s apartment window. Metzger was standing naked with his arms at his side for five seconds. At 8:00 a.m two officers had arrived to the apartment, they observed Metzger standing naked in front of the window eating cereal. The officers said that Metzger was nude from mid-thigh on up and he was standing a foot of the window. Douglas Metzger had violated the Lincoln Municipal Code which stated, that it was unlawful for a person in the city of Lincoln to commit any indecent exposure in the presence of another person.

In the same month, Fred was accused of robbing an ice cream vendor and passing out the ice cream to the kids in Maywood. The police showed the victim a picture of Fred, who then claimed that Fred was the culprit. Fred denied the accusation, and was represented by Jean Williams, who was an attorney he met during Dr. Kings Marches. The case was clearly a set up orchestrated by the Cook County state’s attorney Edward Hanrahan, who wanted Fred behind bars. Despite, the fact that there were no injuries and little loss financial lost, the prosecution paid to have the victim flow back from Vietnam to testify. The Maywood board and community activist supported Fred and held mock trials to help prepare him for the real trial. The official Judge for Fred’s case was Sidney Jones, a black democrat. Judge Jones intended to grant Fred probation because he had no criminal record and there were no weapons involved with the incident. However, Hanrahan persisted, by publically criticizing Judge Jones and demonizing Fred Hampton and the Black Panther Party. As a result, Fred was sentenced to Menard Prison

The Dred Scott decision was a landmark Supreme Court decision on slavery in 1857. Dred Scott was a slave who sued for his freedom after living in Illinois and Wisconsin Territory where slavery was banned. Mr. Scott argued that he should be free since he had lived on free soil. The Supreme Court was to decide three questions: should a black person be considered a citizen and have the ability to sue in court, Did residence in a free state make Mr. Scott free? Did Congress possess the power to prohibit slavery in a territory? The Court was divided on these questions and each Justice issued an opinion. Chief Justice, Roger B. Taney, declared “that only white persons could be citizens”. He insisted that the founding fathers believed that

There was a shootout that went viral recently in Maryland and the information about it is now available for us to discuss. The young lad who was killed during the shootout is identified as Jason Hendrix who is 16 years old and was from Corbin, Kentucky. The Baltimore County Police officers, Maryland have been on a hunt to find this young lad who is a suspect of his parent’s and his 12 years old sisters’ death. Right from there his hunt was on for the cops of Maryland.

On February 17, 2017 a probation warrant was issued for Michael Thompson at CC201507178 for the instant violation offense at OTN: G 766308-4 for Possession of a Controlled Substance, Endangering the Welfare of Children, Disorderly Conduct, Driving While Operating Privileges is Suspended or Revoked and Possession of Drug.

In a narrow southwestern Ontario town of Clinton, Canada, where everyone was associated with the Royal Canadian Air Force base, living on or in company with the base - including a young, 14-year-old boy named Steven Murray Truscott, a popular, athletic teenager who inhabited with his parents. His father, Daniel Truscott, was an RCAF warrant officer and his mother, Doris Truscott, who did not have a job, she only dedicated her life after their family of 6. In June 1959 after a fellow classmate, Lynne Harper was discovered dead and raped, Steven Truscott was constructed to be the only suspect exposed by evidence, displaying to be convicted of first-degree murder. He would soon be acquainted as Canada's youngest death-row inmate, sentenced to be hung months after the murder, at age 14. It wasn't only 45 years later until he was finally exonerated of the crime he was not culpable of.

The Department of Human Resources received a report on Ms. Sue Salter on 9/17/14 alleging Ms. Salter a paraplegic who is paralyzed on her left side was living in a home with no water, power, and had an inadequate caregiver. During investigation, utilities were reconnected and Hospice service provided. Hospice stated Ms. Salter was losing notable weight and found lying in urine during visits. Due to this, several bedsores increased and the doctor ordered a catheter and low air mattress. Ms. Harville, the caregiver was educated on wound care numerous times and demonstrated a working knowledge but choose not to administer wound care.

Roger Shockley was incarcerated in Madison County jail at the beginning of the case opening. Roger was placed in reception at Graham Correctional Center for the months of January and February. In the end of February Roger was transfer to Big Muddy Correctional Center. Roger has not made contact with this worker about his transfer or services he is engaging in at Big Buddy Correctional Center.

Analysis: Michael Hardwick was observed by a Georgia police officer while engaging in the act of consensual homosexual sodomy with another adult in the bedroom of his home. After being charged with violating a Georgia statute that criminalized sodomy, Hardwick challenged the statute's constitutionality in Federal District Court. Following a ruling that Hardwick failed to state a claim, the court dismissed. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded, holding that Georgia's statute was unconstitutional. The court stated that fundamental rights are rights which are “deeply rooted in this nation’s history and tradition” or the rights which are essential to the existence of liberty. But homosexual sodomy, the court ruled, met none of

John Forrest felt that the jury had made multiple mistakes during his trial; therefore, leading him to appeal on those things as follow. Mr. Forrest felt that the jury instructions constitute reversible error and felt he deserved a new jury. It was denied by the courts concerning the issue that was given of malice. He also argued that the instructions given by the courts was inadequate and misleading because it failed to define the phrase, “just cause, excuse or justification thus improperly suggesting the exculpatory evidence did not negate malice or show heat of passion. Mr. Forrest also appealed that the trial court committed reversible error when it inquired into the

Adam Lovell, the young boy, with the tips of all his digits colored in a dark blue, and purple spots all over his trunk, feet, and hands was rushed to the hospital by his parents and was diagnosed with meningococcemia. At this stage, the boy was in pain, vomiting and not looking to recover soon. The parents when faced with a decision to accept multiple blood component therapy to treat a coagulopathy and they accepted. Up till now, the ethical dilemma is not yet present at this stage because obviously the doctors want the best possible treatment for the patient and the parents are looking for the well being of their child and seeking the best possible solution to make their child recuperate from the illness. After several days with treatment,

The Supreme Court determined that Gerald Gault was denied his Constitutional rights based on the 6th Amendment (Facts and Case Summary - In re Gault, n.d.). The 6th Amendment was ratified in 1789 and provided the citizens of our country with rights based on criminal prosecution (Staff, 2010). The amendment provides the defendant with a speedy and public trial by a jury of peers, the notification of the charges against them, legal confrontation of the accuser, accessibility of witnesses in a jury trial and defense counsel. After his arrest, Gerald was detained in a juvenile detention center with no notification provided to his parents (Facts and Case Summary - In re Gault, n.d.). When his parents finally located him at the center, they arrived

In the spring of 2014, I passed on an opportunity to apply for relocation back to my hometown of Midland, TX, due to a variety of variables. I had always told my wife that if Billy Roberson ever retired I would take a look at San Angelo based on how he built the business there. Upon learning of his passing, I made several trips to San Angelo, meeting with Bret Farris and visiting with Russ Lambros. After carefully evaluating the business opportunity, I decided to apply for relocation. The main goal, once getting to San Angelo, was to build on the legacy that Billy created and to merge what eventually proved to be at least four subsets of cultures into one culture. Those four subsets included the team members that Billy hired, those who were hired by corporate IMs, the 10+ from Arkansas who relocated, and those hired after arriving.

1. Why did Nick Leeson sell numerous short straddles for each long futures contract he bought?

1. Why did Nick Leeson sell numerous short straddles for each long futures contract he bought?