The results of my DISC Assessment test were extremely interesting, and in my opinion, quite accurate as well. My results showed that I am very decisive and interactive, then I am moderately stable, but not very cautious, systematic, or much of a perfectionist. These results also tied in fairly closely with my Jung Typology personality test results, which I will explain throughout the latter portion of my paper. My DISC results also ranked my seven dimensions of value and motivation. Not surprisingly for me, “altruistic” was my highest value, sitting at 93 out of 100. This is because I have a very high sincerity and genuine interest in helping others. As well as I am a giving person who desires to provide an environment in which there is opportunity …show more content…
“Aesthetic” and “economic” values both sat at 50, then “theoretical” was at 31, then “regulatory” at 28, and “political” at 26. I definitely agree with these results, and I am not shocked by how low my theoretical, regulatory, and political values are. This is because I am able to balance and understand the need to have structure and order, but I am not paralyzed without it. I am also supportive of the efforts of the team, so I have no hidden agendas, and I am willing to surrender control if necessary. According to my results, as a leader, I am generally known as steadfast and dependable. I can develop a variety of strategies and procedures as situations demand, and I will work hard to make sure they are successful. I agree with the results that I am fairly self-confident and actively seek new or challenging projects. Lastly, I show confidence in my ability to motivate and persuade others into the behaviors required for the desired outcome of the project. I aspire to continue to grow in this area, by not losing my enthusiasm, becoming more responsible and encouraging, and building my confidence to become an even more successful future …show more content…
These results were interesting to me because it indicated that I have a moderate preference of extraversion over introversion; a moderate preference of sensing over intuition; and a moderate preference of feeling over thinking. Each one of these characteristics were favorable by 38%. I found this to be odd that all three of these traits were at a preference of exactly 38%. However, for my last letter, my results indicated that I have marginal or no preference of judging over perceiving. Judging was only favored by 3%, and therefore, that is why the ESFP personality type can also be a fit for me. By simply looking at the four words indicated by the letters of my results, I believe that each one is pretty accurate. However, I definitely would have predicted more than a moderate preference of extraversion over introversion. I probably would have guess that extraversion would be favored by 70-80%, not by only 38%. I was also quite surprised that judging was only favored by 3% over
When taking the Jung typology test the profile I received was INFJ. In this profile, “I” stands for introvert. What this means is that I tend to be more introverted, rather than extraverted. An example of this is, a friend of mine was having a party and asked me to go. Since it was my friend’s birthday I decided to go. When I got to the party I realized that I wouldn’t be able to talk to her very much because of all the people there. I spent most of the night being very quiet and not starting up any conversations. Whenever someone started talking to me, I would keep the conversation going of course. After about an hour of uncomfortable socializing I decided to step out on her back porch for some peace and quiet. I often find that when I am
The Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test provided me with unexpected results. The test showed me that I am more of an extravert over introvert, I have a “slight preference of sensing over intuition”, I have “no preference of thinking over feeling”, and I have “slight preference of judging over perceiving.” These results surprised me slightly while also telling me things I already expected.
The Jung Personality Test, was a test, trying to figure out about what kind of person I am. The test had many different questions it was asking and I would answer them truthfully. Through this test, I learned I was extroverted, sensitive, a thinker/feeler and perceiving.
B. According to the site, it says that those with this personality type have a keen sense of right and wrong and are known to be on time. They do best following step- by-step procedures, go by just the facts, and are dependable enough to carry something through (even if it negatively effects them). When someone is inconsistent, they are frustrated but usually keep that to themselves to keep away from a conflict. My personality type makes tough decisions and sticks to them. Suggested careers are in administrative management, management, accounting, dentist or dental assistant. Famous people who share this personality
After taking the four surveys, I have a better understanding of myself. The surveys help me decide which track I should head toward in the future as well as which part of my personality I should improve.
This assignment assured some parts of my personality that I already knew. But, it also taught me new things about me. The Jung Typology test gave as a result that my type of person is ISTJ; 47% introvert, 1% sensing, 34% thinking and 9% judging. I actually agree with these results because it accurately reflects my type of personality. I am a quiet person that does not often socialize since I feel very comfortable when I’m surrounded by my family and close friends. In addition, my personality tends to be very rational and neutral and most of my decisions are normally ruled by what is logical and not based on emotions. Therefore, a lot of people see me as a cold person. The last component which is judging also resembles a lot on me since I believe that we as humans don’t know what the other people have to go through in their daily lives.
What is your Jungian Typology? What do these four Typology letters mean? What does the designation mean to you? How do you feel about them?
It was no surprise that the results from my test differed from those of Jim. According to the results of the test I am an ESFP with the following percentages: Extroverted (E) 54.14%, Sensing (S) 65.22%, Feeling (F) 55.88%, and Perceiving (P) 50%. The test describes my personality as an “Entertainer” that “radiates attractive warmth and optimism, is smooth, witty, charming, clever, fun to be with, and very generous” (Flynn, n.d.). According to this assessment only 8.5% of the total population have this personality type.
When growing up I was often a very quiet child who chose not to speak to almost anyone. The idea of speaking to people scared and intimidated my little mind, which was terrified of anyone or anything that towered over me. Throughout the duration of my life I was able to grow out of this and become a “social butterfly”, according to my mother. I now associate with many people and find no difficulty in speaking with most people. Even though I’ve developed my ability to speak with people I still think of myself as introverted and following the Jung Typology Test my idea was further enforced. I strongly agree with what was presented to me at the end of the test when it deemed me as “INFP”. “I” stands for Introverted feeling which often refers to
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is based on the Jung’s theory of psychological types. This is a self-report questionnaire that gives insight into how people interpret the world around them. This can be significantly important, as it can help someone better understand themselves, as well as their relationships, education, career, and role in the workplace. The MBTI was developed by Katharine Cook Briggs together along with her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers.
The DISC assessment, similar to the Jung-Typology, I felt was not as accurate and I
In the webtext i completed both assessments, the first which was the Jungian Typology quiz. After taking this quiz it informed me that I am:34% Introvert, 31% Intuitive, 12% feeling and 16% judging.
According to the results, my score for the behavior in the JUNG Typology Test is ISTJ which stands for Introversion, Sensing, Thinking, Judgement. The reasons that this is a satisfaction for me is because ISTJs we are often called inspectors. It clearly describes my personality for the sense of right and wrong, especially in the area of interest and/or responsibility (Perceiving with five senses). I am noted for devotion to duty and punctuality is a watchword of the ISTJ. Another behavior to use on the daily basis is that I like to use the highest efficiency when employing a step-by-step approach (Attending to step by step experience). For example, I like to carry a project through, even at the expense of mine own health.
Introversion was defined as “withdrawn and often shy, and they tend to focus on themselves, on their own thoughts and feelings” (Jung, 1923) Therefore focusing on this personality trait can help to better understand why people tend to be reserved and withdrawn from everyday life. Carl Jung was the creator of the neopsychoanalytical approach, which focused on psychic energy. While Gordon Allport and Hans Eysenck contributor to the trait theory, focused on biology and individualized traits. Jung, Eysenck and Allport focused on extrovert vs. introvert, yet had completely different ideas of how introversion is seen in everyday life. Personally believeing this trait is one I carry, focusing on completely different approaches will bring light to many explanations of why people act the way they do, including myself. By using both case studies and personal work from the works of Jung, Eysenck, and Allport researching introversion should not be a an issue. Although there is a lot of work to do with introversion, through this research one can get a better overview.
In the 1920’s, a Swiss psychologist named Carl Jung devised a theory. Jung didn’t accept the idea that the behaviors of people were random. Instead, he was a firm believer that the differences between individuals were a result of how people use their brains. Jung claimed that “what appears to be random behavior is actually the result of differences in the way people prefer to use their mental capacities.” (The Myers & Briggs Foundation). Jung realized that people typically function in one of two ways, take in information or make decisions, and that people usually are more comfortable alone or around others. With all these observations, Jung wrote a book titled Psychological Types, which introduced the idea of personality and psychological