XP 39802: Strategic Leadership
Booth School of Business
University of Chicago
Winter 2014
Professor Chris Rider
Christopher.Rider@chicagobooth.edu
TA: Craig Tutterow (craigtutterow@chicagobooth.edu)
This syllabus is required reading for this course.
OVERVIEW
To achieve individual and organizational performance objectives, executives must coordinate activities among employees, between groups, and across organizations. Often expected to meet these objectives, leaders are not always trained to do so. By focusing on both formal and informal aspects of organizations, this course prepares executives to lead organizations strategically by leveraging principles of evidence-based leadership and by managing networks of
…show more content…
Rider
GRADING (continued)
Each graded course component will be normalized by the class mean on each component. The calculation is as below, where i represents the student’s score and m represents the class mean on that component. For example, if the average class participation grade is 11 out of 15 then a student that received a score of 14 receives a normalized score of 1.27 (=14/11); CPi = 14.0; CPm = 11.0. Each normalized component score will then be weighted by the percentages above to produce a Final
Grade Score using the formula below:
Final Grade Score = 0.40*(CPi / CPm) + 0.30*(APi / APm) + 0.30*(GAi / GAm)
There is no predetermined relationship between absolute numeric scores and letter grades.
Numeric final grades will be converted to letter grades by ranking all Final Grade scores and assigning letter grades according to Booth grading policy (e.g., a maximum GPA of 3.33).
QUESTIONS and GRADE APPEAL POLICY
To enable a complete understanding of the course content, clarification questions will be answered promptly and additional feedback will be provided upon request. Email is the preferred mode of communication. Absolutely no grade appeals will be considered.
GROUPS
You will work in the campus-specific groups assigned by the XP program office. These groups must deliver one graded group assignment but are also encouraged to prepare for course sessions together. More assignment details are offered later in this
Letter Grade: A = 90 - 100%; B = 80 - 89%; C = 70 - 79%; D = 60 - 69%; F = 0 – 59%.
I first create a grade category and an overall GPA category to divide all students into five different groups based on their final grades
Case 0: Overall grade for student 0: 3.3 Case 1: Error encountered when processing student 0: Homework grade is out of range Case 2: Error encountered when processing student 0: Final grade is out of range Case 3: Error encountered when processing student 1: Midterm grade is out of range Case 4: Error encountered when processing student 2: There are no homework grades Case 5: Error encountered when processing student 3: Student number is out of range Case 6: Overall grade for student 1:
The system should be able to produce a final score out of ten for each student.
Mr. McClean, our network’s Director of Student Information Systems, provided key information about Miriam’s calculated grade. When we manually calculated her score with assigned weights to Classwork (50%), Homework (10%), Quizzes (25%), and Tests (15%) and without dropping her lowest score, her grade was a 63%. The formula that we used was:
Rubric: The quiz is worth 25 points. Each selected-response question is worth 1 point. The student will receive 1 point for selecting the correct answer. Each constructed-response is worth 5 points. In order to receive all 5 points for each constructed response, the student must fulfill the criteria below. The minimum passing score is 19 out of 25
Organizational and Industrial (I/O) psychology is used to improve different types of organizational functions. When tasks and employee relationships are not working properly within a company production and profit will be compromised. Some of the issues that I/O manages addresses include poor work habits and dysfunctional work relationships. The following will address group and team concepts that could be implemented to improve performance and diversity, leadership theories that can improve the relationship between management and floor workers, the influence
You have earne 60.5 out of 75 point for an overall score of 80.71%. There are some grades that need to be updated, and we are waiting fo your Test 2 grade. I think next week, you will have a more accurate overall grade in this
A comparison of norm-referencing and criterion-referencing methods for determining student grades in higher education. (n.d.). Retrieved February 3, 2015, from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning/06/normvcrit6.html
These are the automatically computed results of your exam. Grades for essay questions, and comments from your instructor, are in the "Details" section below.
Grade Calculation: Each quarter and the final exam will count as 20% of the final year grade. Students
keep things in proportion because a small fraction in their percentage grade may cause them to
Data Collection: You will need the second grade Case 21 scores, student names, and use the ordinal scale to rank students.
Females: 41.7 / 73.6 = 0.566576 = 56.7 %. The pass score of 56.7% shows that there is evidence of adverse impact: 62.5 / 77.7 = 0.8043758 = 80.4%. The pass rate which is 80.4% indicates that there is no evidence of adverse impact.
= IRR (normal) * 0.7 + IRR (best) * 0.2 + IRR (worst) * 0.1