The manner in which we are able to distinguish right from wrong as we get older and mature is referred to as moral development. Moral reasoning or rational judgment making is also a dependent factor of one’s moral development. According to Lawrence Kohlberg, “People move beyond their current stage when they encounter a crisis that their current mode of thinking is unable to satisfactorily resolve” (Boss 92). There are certain characteristics that a morally developed person will have and that a non-developed person will be lacking, which is how they are differentiable from one another. Based on many variables, there is a high possibility for moral development to occur. I will explain my position by discussing all aspects of Kohlberg’s Stage Theory of Moral Development, the different types of defense mechanisms that could prevent a person from moving on, which levels other theories might hold using the stage theory, and the purpose of studying ethics. For a start, Jean Piaget was the first psychologist in the nineteenth century to research moral reasoning, focusing mainly on children. Piaget noticed that children “go through distinct stages of moral development.” He labeled the first one “stage of heteronomy” and the second one “stage of autonomy” (Boss 90). In the 1970’s, Harvard psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg, noticed that Piaget, Socrates, Immanuel Kant and John Rawls shared a common trait. Their works demonstrated a higher stage of moral judgment. Based on this reasoning
The theory holds that moral reasoning, the basis for ethical behavior, has six identifiable developmental stages, each more adequate at responding to moral dilemmas than its predecessor.Kohlberg followed the development of moral judgment far beyond the ages studied earlier by Piaget,who also claimed that logic and morality develop through constructive stages.Expanding on Piaget's work, Kohlberg determined that the process of moral development was principally concerned with justice, and
Lawrence Kohlberg was a well known psychologist best known for his thorough research into the development and better understanding of the processes needed to grow into a well developed human being. Kohlberg grew up in New York City on October 25, 1927. Growing up in such a diverse area is what struck his interest in the development of all beings. In only one short year he received his bachelors degree and then went on to devote his career to study the understanding of development for the youth. Kohlberg 's stages of moral development were very much influenced by his peer Jean Piaget. Jean Piaget also had a similar belief of a stage-based theory of development. While Piaget only had two
Lawrence Kohlberg, a developmental psychologist, identified six developmental stages of human moral reasoning. The first stage that he recognized was the Punishment-Obedience Orientation, where the person’s concern is for avoiding punishment through obedience. The second stage was the Instrumental Relativist Orientation, where the person’s concern is to work in their self interest, and better their position. The third stage of moral development was the Good Boy-Nice Girl Orientation, where the person’s concern lies with their reputation. Next was the Law And Order Orientation, where the person was less concerned with their own immediate well being to the maintenance of a larger society. The fifth stage was the Social Contract
As stages in psychological development have been defined by Freud, stages in moral development have been outlined by early educators Jean Piaget and Kohlberg, who put forth differing views on the moral development of children. Piaget theorized that children process morals in stages, first one then the next, with a transition in between. The first stage (from ages 4 to about 7) is referred to as “heteronymous morality”, where children think of rules as constants, that is to say, rules are part of the world’s makeup with no input or possibility of change by people. As children progress from seven to ten years of age, they move from one stage to the next, maintaining some of the traits of the
To the best of your ability, indicate which of Kohlberg’s stages of moral development might explain the moral reasoning involved in the following: a. Waging war to protect or further economic interests. The moral reasoning for this, I believe, would be for self-interest indicating stage 2 of Kohlberg’s moral development. The decision to wage war in order to further ones economic growth, clearly demonstrates the desire to personally benefit from the action taken. b.
Lawrence Kohlberg, the author of three stages, was an American psychologist who is well known for his theory on the stages of moral development. According to Kohlberg, there are three levels of moral development:Preconventional (moral reasoning is based on external rewards and punishments), Conventional (laws and rules are upheld simply because they are laws and rules), and Postconventional (reasoning is based on personal moral standards)” (powerpoint).
Lawrence Kohlberg is known for his theory of moral development developed in 1958. His theory was dependent on the thinking of Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget and American philosopher John Dewey. It consists of three levels of moral reasoning: preconventional, conventional, and postconventional. These levels are based on the degree to which an individual accommodates to the conventional standards of society. Each level aquires two stages that serve as different standards of sophistication in moral reasoning. Overall, Kohlberg affirms that moral development is a process of maturing that emerges from thinking about about moral issues (“Kohlberg’s Moral Development”).
Connect the six stages of Moral Development to the various philosophical traditions discussed in the text book, notes and in the Harvard Justice lecture series, i.e. Deontological, Utilitarian/Consequentialist and Teleological and to their philosophical origins i.e. Aristotle, Kant, Bentham etc.
There are three levels to Kohlberg's moral stages and in each level there are two stages. The three levels goes up to six stages, which the text says stages very few people even reach stages five and six. Level one discusses preconventional morality, which is morality prior to any conception of social convention or shared norms. The first stage in this level are punishment and obedience. Moral thinking is characterized by perceptions of right and wrong that are based on obedience to authority and shaped by the threat of punishment or the promise of reward. The second stage is instrumental purpose and exchange. That is moral thinking characterized by egoism or self-interest. I can address the first stage by simply giving out rewards to my officers that are doing a great job. Can also give days off or give free tickets to keep morale up. On the other side of the fence, if any of my officers are not doing what they are supposed to do then punishment will be given out. This can be desk duty, suspension, suspended pay, etc.
Kohlberg’s stages of moral development were based on a moral philosopher by the name of Lawrence Kohlberg. His main interest was to observe children during growth to develop and conclude which stages they best fit into. After observing both adults and children, he concluded that, “Human beings progress consecutively from one stage to the next in an invariant sequence” (“Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development”). All of the 6 stages he created, represent the morality in which a child or adult can be at; he created an age zone for each stage. There are a total of 6 stages but each main concept consists of 3 levels. Level 1 is the preconventional stage. This stage focuses on punishment/obedience and how the person decides to act due to the
Kohlberg (1963, 1981, 1984; Colby & Kohlberg, 1987) expanded Piaget’s work, developing a most influential cognitive developmental theory of moral development. Kohlberg proposed the progression through the invariant, universal sequence of three moral levels each composed of two distinct stages. According to Kohlberg, no stage can be skipped, neither will there be a regression to an earlier stage.
The second level of moral development is the conventional moral reasoning; “Beginning in middle school, up to middle age – most people end up here” (“Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development.”). At this level,
Goldman Sachs should have been punished for its behavior in the years leading up to the financial crisis. Goldman ended up settling with the federal government for $110 Billion, which I do not believe was sufficient based on the magnitude of problems created. This amount should have been much larger, and at minimum they should have forfeited the $14 Billion paid to them by AIG. (Inside Job, 2011) In addition, AIG should have had the right to sue Goldman Sachs for fraud. It was in the public’s best interest to keep Goldman up and running, however additional penalties could have been put on a repayment schedule to keep them solvent. Instead, you had Goldman giving out large bonuses.
The theory of moral development, advanced by psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg is one of the most well-known persuasive theories in the field of cognitive science and stems from the work of Jean Piaget, which hypothesizes on the direct correlation that exists between moral and cognitive development. Kohlberg speaks of the appearance and understanding of what is right and wrong from childhood to adulthood and explains by this transition through the identification of various levels of morality known as pre-conventional, conventional and post conventional. People will make decisions based on the understanding of the possible outcome and through reasoning of morals. (Target Concept)