Krasner Why Nations Fail Summary

The first interpretation of sovereignty that is examined by Flanagan views sovereignty in an international sense. Sovereignty for these leaders means gaining more international power and acceptance. Flanagan argues that major international bodies such as the United Nations will be accepting such an attempt at sovereignty (71). As the second

Following military acts of governmental authority or national warfare, a significant worry arises for nations. As stated in the powerpoint, especially when the state is large and diverse, it is much more likely that it is becomes fragile. The question of whether the nation will need national-building, or state-building has to be determined in the case of military acts. State collapse can be due to the failure of the nation to convey favorable diplomatic benefits to the nation. The collapse of a state can be due to a number of reasons, for example the vast amount of governmental goods. Also, the failure of a nation can be caused by the lack of providing protection and safety, a permissible organization that examines

The defining characteristic of the state is the ability to wield power. The use of power, both inside and outside of one’s border, directly speaks to the sovereignty of the nation. If a nation is incapable of disciplining or punishing its citizens it will invariably become a failed state. Moreover if a country isn’t recognized as powerful in the global political arena, that country stands a very good chance of being dominated by a nation who has the capacity to enforce its own will. The use, or at least the perception, of power is so fundamental in nationhood that those who wield the most power can easily dictate world events.

Every since the turn of the 19th century, democracy, the core value and principle of the United Nations, has grown strong in many parts of Europe, North America, Latin America, and East Asia. However, many parts of the world still lay under authoritarian rule, and the change to democracy involves violent demonstrations and protests, riots and even civil wars. These violent transitions towards democracy result in an unstable foundation for the emerging democracies, especially when the country not only has to face the challenge of keeping their new government in check, but also enforce safety measures with subsequent planning to prevent a relapse into chaos and violence. The best option seems to be achieving independence by all means possible.

‘The Nation State is dead, long live the TNC’. Critically assess the changing relationships between TNC’s and nation states.

Some scholars have acknowledged that some attempts at saving failing states have resulted in governments

This essay will argue how a certain state handles challenges to state capacity. State capacity is the ability of a state to implement decisions and whether it has the resources, organization and leadership to implement its decesions.1 This essay will describe the challenges Belgium had the last decade and will argue how this affected the state capacity. Belgium is a constitutional monarchy and a member of the Europian Union (EU) and the United Nations (UN). These institutions have influence on the state capacity of Belgium as the state is obliged to follow certain guidelines of these institutions. However, I won 't discuss the influence of the United Nations and European Union, because these influences are relatively small in the discussed issues. In this essay it will be argued how the economic crisis and the problems with forming of government challenged the state capacity of Belgium.

Krasner: According to Krasner it can be stated that governance and transitional administration are inadequate. For this reason Krasner created three elements in which he viewed conventional sovereignty, however, each still may contain their own violations of conventional sovereignty. International Legal Sovereignty, which, its main goal is to target and recognize the lawfully independent territorial entities however, many states at times do not recognize each other.

Sovereignty is a norm of the International system upon which the ‘society of states’ rests. Territorial sovereignty refers specifically to the power of the state ‘the territorial limits within which state authority may be exercised on an exclusive basis.’ This essay will explore the concept and development of sovereignty within the system of states. Firstly, it will identify the state system before the ‘Peace of Westphalia’ in 1648, then it will compare the ever changing forms of sovereignty since, and the reasons for change, which have established the modern form of sovereignty which exists today.

| Learning Objective: 06-01 - What the sovereignty of nations means and how it can affect the stability of government policies

No global definition exists for states described as “fragile”, “failing”, or failed because they come in all shapes and sizes. Yet, countries that have failed at the basic responsibilities of governance and sovereign authority are generally lumped into this group. Fragile, failing, or failed states share similar characteristics including their inability to control their borders, loss of authority over insurgents, gangs, and warlords, and loss of legitimacy internally/internationally. Examples relevant today of countries that are fragile or failing, and on the path to failed status include Iraq and many of the Middle Eastern countries struggling to maintain their autonomy in the fight against ISIS. Other important indicators of failed states include:

Although global actors can sometimes have considerable power over states, the extent of this power ultimately depends on the relative power and influence of the state in question. Large developed states, such as the US, are extremely powerful compared to most other global actors and are not often influenced by their actions. However, small and undeveloped states are not always completely powerless. To determine whether states are indeed the most powerful global actors, we must look at the relative powers of trans-national corporations (TNCs), non-government organisations (NGOs) and some of the institutions of global governance.

Why Nations Fail takes an in depth look into why some countries flourish and become rich powerful nations while other countries are left in or reduced to poverty. Throughout this book review I will discuss major arguments and theories used by the authors and how they directly impact international development, keeping in mind that nations are only as strong as their political and economical systems.

On a European level, and to a degree on an international level it is argued that national states have experience a decrease of sovereignty. This is due to some political powers giving been

There are great differences and inequality between countries around the world. Many countries don’t have access to basic needs such as education, health care, law and order, safety why is that? Why is there a gap between rich and poor? How did some countries manage to become rich while others remained poor? These are the regularly asked questions about the development of countries. There are different perspectives on the growth of countries; however the three main theories mentioned in the book are due to geography, culture, ignorance or institutions. The authors of “Why nations fail “Acemoglu and Robhinson have challenged these theories . They believe that political institutions are the main factors for development of a well-functioning nation and the determinants of economic institutions. "It's all about institutions," Daron Acemoglu, one of the authors, explained. "It's really about human-made systems, rules, regulations, formal or informal that creates different incentives."