Leadership and the Life Cycle of a Group
A group is a living thing, developing over time and adapting to the environment and expectations imposed upon it as it grows. When observed carefully, a pattern of distinct phases emerge in this growth process. It is important to recognize and take advantage of these various stages of development in order to maximize group effectiveness and efficiency. There are several different models for small group development, but Tuckman 's model is "probably the most famous sequential-stage theory" (Johnson & Johnson, 2016, p.27). This paper will discuss the five stages of group development according to Tuckman 's model as well as some practical leadership guidelines that will help a group remain effective
…show more content…
Of great value at this stage is encouragement and patience. The reason for the conflict is generally insecurity (Bonebright, 2010, p. 114), so providing a strong support system an reassurance can help move a group to the next phase.
As members of the group begin to feel safe and secure, the conflict will settle and the group will develop a bond and unified goals. Labeled a period of norming, it is "characterized by close relationships and cohesiveness" (Group Development, 2003). In fact, this stage is so characterized by relationship that it could almost be viewed as a honeymoon phase. Group members will frequently set aside differences and unity becomes a priority. It is important at this stage to emphasize honesty and creativity because the group will likely be trying so hard to be amenable that some members may hold back. Others will be ready to open up given their newfound sense of security within the group. This is also a critical time for the group because it typically delineates a time to commit (Johnson & Johnson, 2016). If a group reaches this stage and not all members are on board, it may hinder progress.
Once a group has developed cohesiveness, it will truly begin to produce. This phase of effectiveness is titled performing according to Tuckman 's model. At this stage, the group is a "problem-solving instrument", capable of working through obstacles and accomplishing goals (Bonebright, 2010, p. 114). Is it not uncommon for groups
Tuckman in his "Stages of Development' model identified 5 stages of team formation: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning (CIPP, Unit 1). Based on his analysis and characteristics of each stage it becomes possible to recognise that the team has reached the stage of 'Performing'. According to Tuckman it is the final stage of development when a team is fully functioning and produces its 'best work'. The main features of the ‘Performing’ stage are (CIPP, Unit
The second phase represents a time period of group and intergroup conflicts. This stage is characterized by divergence around interpersonal issues and lack of unity. Team members seek to retain security, resist moving into unknown areas of interpersonal relations. Tuckman wrote: “the group members become hostile toward one another and toward a therapist or trainer as a means of expressing their individuality and resisting the formation of group structure” (Tuckman, 1965, p. 386). In the stage, team members have an emotional response to the targets, particularly when goals are related with self-change and self-understanding. Emotional reactions may be less visible in groups working toward depersonalised and intellectual problems, but resistance may still be
A useful theory to explain our processes and development as a group is Tuckman’s theory of group working which explains the stages that a group will progress through in order to achieve an objective, including the Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing and Adjourning stages (Mindtools, 2016). The forming stage was pre-established for our group because we had been allocated together prior to the task and we had already managed to build relationships with one another. It was at the storming stage we began to establish our roles within the group and allocate tasks for
Whether groups are formed for social or task oriented purposes, the ability to produce and maintain a sense of affiliation, peer support and collaboration is important for overall group functioning. The cohesion of a social group is produced through the establishment of a set of group norms, which are later defined as a guide for conduct accepted within a group of individuals. However, in order for a group to perform and produce results, the team leader should guide his/her team through the proper stages of group development, which includes the following steps: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. Although teams should follow all these stages of group development, the forming and the norming stages are the most important,
Groups do not always start off fully-formed and functioning. Bruce Tuckman's model of the developmental sequence in small groups suggests that groups grow through clearly defined stages, from their creation as groups of
Norming – during this stage the trust and respect is developing amongst the members of the group, since it becomes clear that each member has a role and they are aware of what
The five stages of developing groups is an important part of the position. In many cases it is the relationships that a person will have with other individuals who will determine the best members to put into the different groups. As well, the different skill sets that individuals have are also an important part in placing group members together. The observation of the first groups placed together will be a good gauge in learning how some of the individuals work and observing how others work well together. The group size should be eight to 10 people to facilitate greater ease of equal participation among the individuals.
Using Tuckman’s (1965) model of group development, our first session can be considered as our “forming stage.” This was on the basis that it involved introducing ourselves to one another and to quote Price (2001): “we created and negotiated an
In 1965, B. Tuckman published his idea of how groups assemble by using his ‘Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing model’. You could say that his theory is a helpful explanation of team development, but they may differ from one individual to another. The model does explain how the team develops its maturity, through establishing working relationships. It also connotes the leadership style changing; from a directing style, to coaching, then participating and delegating before almost being detached.
The five stage Tuckman’s theory (1965) namely forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning focuses on the way in which a group handles a task from the beginning to completion. The main group work approaches are cognitive behaviourist, feminist, psychoanalytic and humanistic approaches. Knowledge of theory enhances effectiveness of group work.
As per Dr.Tuckman's hypothesis, "there are five phases of group improvement: framing, stroming, norming, performing, and dismissing. Amid these stages aggregate individuals must address a few issues and the route in which these issues are determined figures out if the group will prevail with regards to fulfilling its tasks.
Groupthink can stem from many factors, one of those factors being group development itself. One of the most commonly known group development processes is Tuckman’s five stages of group development: forming, storming, norming, performing, adjourning. During the course of these stages a group will get acquainted with each other, go through the process of expressing their frustration for each other,
environment brings out the best in each person enabling the team to achieve their goals
A group engages in certain processes that naturally occur when a set of individuals are working together. In the Orientation phase, the needs of group members are to be oriented to the task, that is, to define the task, specify issues, identify expectations, and explore the nature of the work. From this, members develop a common understanding of the group's purpose. In the Testing and Dependency phase, participants generally act as if they depend on the leader to provide all the structure. They look to the leader to set the ground rules, establish the agenda, to do all the "leading," while the group members acclimate themselves to the setting. Group members exhibit behavior to test what behavior is acceptable and what is not, and begin to establish boundaries, to consider themselves as individuals in relation to the group, and to define the function of the group and the leader. This phase generally concludes when there is general agreement that the goals are achievable and that change is possible--whether it be changing behavior, making a decision, or solving a problem. Organizing to get work done involves a number of group decisions. These include establishing work rules, determining limits, defining the reward system, setting the criteria for the task, dividing the work and assigning individual responsibility for particular tasks. As it relates to
First and foremost, thank you for your service. Additionally, your discussion board post was very educational. I would like to further examine the storming stage of Tuckman's Stages of Group Development. Our textbook states the following about the storming phase of Tuckman’s Stages of Group Development, “ Individuals test the leader's policies and assumptions as they determine how they fit into the power structure” (Kinicki & Fugate, 2016, p. 265). At this stage, it is imperative for group leaders to maintain control of the group.