preview

Literature Review Editing Process

Decent Essays

Literature Review In examining recent literature on the topic of “editing” in the writing process, three areas appear to be of some concern in dealing with this issue: 1) The true definition of editing and the editing process, 2) The perceived role and responsibilities of the teacher and students, and 3) Effective editing strategies that will increase student learning. In order to truly implement editing strategies that will impact the learner, the first two areas must be addressed.
In the review of the literature, I found that many students and teachers alike had some misconceptions about the true definition of “editing” and the roles that each must play. Often times, the editing process and the revision process were mistakenly mixed, or thought to be one and the same process. Marchisan and Alber (2001) define the revision stage as the time to look for changes in concepts and improvements to the paper in order to help achieve its purpose for the audience. In this stage, the writer becomes a problem solver to improve the concept (idea) of the paper.
The editing stage is on a different scale. It is not used to make changes in the concept of the paper, rather it is to improve and clarify the meaning. Enders (2001) states that in the editing stage, students should check for errors in spelling, usage, and clarity of expression. Too often teachers mix both the revision stage and editing stage, creating confusion with the students in what they are really suppose to do

Get Access