preview

Man On Wire Analysis

Decent Essays

In an extremely rare occurrence, I watched “Man on Wire” twice in 24 hours. I enjoyed the movie, which I watched because of Adam Kempenaar’s continuous praise, but I don’t love it enough to merit that second viewing. On the contrary, the first time I watched it was at 11 p.m. and I had been up since 4:30 that morning. So my mental faculties weren’t at their peak, and I began to doze off even though I liked the documentary. So I watched it again the next day, at a better time and with more sleep, to help me clarify why I think this is a very good but not great film.
Man on Wire,” James Marsh’s 2008 documentary, chronicles the story of Philippe Petit, an eccentric French tightrope walker who dreamed of performing on a wire between the Twin Towers. …show more content…

The walk is gratifying and somewhat beautiful and moving, but you don’t quite know why. Maybe it’s because it’s fun to see Petit, in photographs, finally realize his dream. Maybe it’s the payoff of seeing the “heist” accomplished. Maybe it’s the poignancy of seeing someone with such joy atop what became a symbol for tragedy and loss on 9/11. Regardless of the reason, you certainly feel a swell of emotion when you see the images of Petit on the wire.
With all that being said, I do think a few things hold “Man on Wire” back from becoming a truly great movie. One of those is that the lines between the recreations and archival footage that Marsh uses is often blurred. That bothered me for some reason, possibly because I’d like to know which one is the “truth.”
I eventually thought, however, that I don’t think documentaries can truly show us objective reality, so that shouldn’t matter. I also thought it didn’t matter what was real footage and reconstructions because regardless the talent displayed in these segments actually happened and is impressive. Despite these conclusions, I still found myself pulled out of the movie when I couldn’t deduce if the images onscreen were archival footage or

Get Access