In an extremely rare occurrence, I watched “Man on Wire” twice in 24 hours. I enjoyed the movie, which I watched because of Adam Kempenaar’s continuous praise, but I don’t love it enough to merit that second viewing. On the contrary, the first time I watched it was at 11 p.m. and I had been up since 4:30 that morning. So my mental faculties weren’t at their peak, and I began to doze off even though I liked the documentary. So I watched it again the next day, at a better time and with more sleep, to help me clarify why I think this is a very good but not great film.
“Man on Wire,” James Marsh’s 2008 documentary, chronicles the story of Philippe Petit, an eccentric French tightrope walker who dreamed of performing on a wire between the Twin Towers.
…show more content…
The walk is gratifying and somewhat beautiful and moving, but you don’t quite know why. Maybe it’s because it’s fun to see Petit, in photographs, finally realize his dream. Maybe it’s the payoff of seeing the “heist” accomplished. Maybe it’s the poignancy of seeing someone with such joy atop what became a symbol for tragedy and loss on 9/11. Regardless of the reason, you certainly feel a swell of emotion when you see the images of Petit on the wire.
With all that being said, I do think a few things hold “Man on Wire” back from becoming a truly great movie. One of those is that the lines between the recreations and archival footage that Marsh uses is often blurred. That bothered me for some reason, possibly because I’d like to know which one is the “truth.”
I eventually thought, however, that I don’t think documentaries can truly show us objective reality, so that shouldn’t matter. I also thought it didn’t matter what was real footage and reconstructions because regardless the talent displayed in these segments actually happened and is impressive. Despite these conclusions, I still found myself pulled out of the movie when I couldn’t deduce if the images onscreen were archival footage or
Although many historical filmmakers alter some events and use fiction as a tool in providing an accurate historical representation, the makers of “The
Tom Hanks who is the main character couldn’t believe his eyes. He was shocked that those cruel scenes were happening right in front of his face. Spielberg also stops the music and makes the screen kind of blurry to instill a sense of reality to the atmosphere. This definitely added more reality to the movie. Tim O’Brien said credibility might be threatened by telling an unbelievable story but this unbelievable aspect of the movie adds more credibility. The way he shot the film almost gives us a feeling that we were watching a documentary about war. These are the aspects Tim O’Brien exactly talks about in his text. Spielberg includes unbelievable aspect to his movie but he does not lose the credibility as Tim O’Brien states on his text.
Man on wire which was set in 1947 directed by James Marsh about a french high wire artist Philippe Petit who is fascinated by New Yorks trade Centre where he has strung a six metre tight rope between the twin tires and walked across it without any fear. The documentary is about Petit 's daring attempt, the aftermath and about his friends and the people who helped him achieve his life goals. Some consider it “the artistic crime of the century” The director has used many techniques to captivate audiences making us feel like we are apart of this incredible story. Techniques such as Interviews and archival footage.
There are people who just suck you up in their lives and throw you away when they don’t need you anymore. Philippe Petit, the main character of the documentary film “Man on Wire”, directed by James Marsh, is a great example of such a sucker. Barry Greenhouse, Petit’s accomplice, says it during the film, “He sort of draws you into his world.”
A documentary can also be a compilation film of footages collected from various means or through government sources
In August 1974, Philippe Petit, a Frenchman with a passion for walking on wires, captivated New York City as he stealthy made his way to the top of the World Trade Center. Once there, he walked across a cable strung between the Twin Towers, a historic feat that 's vividly depicted in a new documentary, Man On Wire (which will be screening tonight). The famous walk turned a void 1/4 mile above the streets into a stage, and made Petit into an instant "folk hero." He now lives upstate in Woodstock, and yesterday we talked with him about those 45 minutes between the towers, that first daring step onto the wire, and the ones that followed.
There were many different topics in this class that I found interesting such as the creation of cities, the suburbs, and the different types of housing, but the main topic I found interesting was the Tapping into The Wire book. Overall, I think that this book and the stories that were discussed and the problems Baltimore faces were very interesting. The book discusses just a few of the many drug, gun, and poverty problems that have taken over parts of Baltimore, the Baltimore paper and the book were an eye-opener for me and just how bad problems can get. After reading Tapping into the Wire I think that the riots that happened were long over due by how the book portrays the problems with the police. I have since started watching many of the
Starting off with a Lighter tone the Critic A. O. Scott, writing for the New York Times, had Found the film to be a delight. He focused on the entertainment that the film provided to the viewer and the continued joy that one may feel after the fact. Scott’s Review scraped the top of the barrel he represents the majority of people of whom merely enter the theater to lose themselves in the story and perhaps forget something in the process. Scott praises the film for its dark comedy and use of gore that both enthralled and revolted his senses. “It may seem strange that I am praising a work of such unremitting savagery. I confess that I’m a little startled myself, but it’s
This helps to build the realness of the story and is the foundation of the documentary. Morris’s use of re-enactments is interesting, although, in my opinion not always successful. The re-enactments themselves feel like a quickly throne together skit, rather than truly intentional moments of acting. I think that there are moments that are really interesting, for example as mentioned in the previous question, the shots of the victim’s injuries drawn out with the sound of gun fire was really powerful. Other shots were not as powerful for me, for
In this episode of The Wire the police unit is beginning to have evidence from the wiretaps to from a case against Avon Barksdale. Major Rawls is still going after McNutly’s badge and wants him off the police unit. Santangelo tells McNulty that Rawls has had him spying on him to get him fired. The police unit catches Bird who killed the eyewitness in D’Angelos murder trial. While being interviewed Bird uses derogatory language when talking to detective Greggs. Lt. Daniels attends a fundraiser with other politicians such as Senator Clay Davis and deputy commissioner Ervin Burrell.
The movie that this paper is written about is known as ‘Kill Bill’. This movie is a violent story of a woman on a path of revenge. Beaten down and shot to pieces putting her into a coma, she was left for dead, only to awaken two years later to hunt down those who tried to kill her. Now both Kill Bill volumes one and two will be referenced in this paper. Though the assignment was for one movie, the story arc procession through both movies would be incomplete with only one half being told. Like any story in life, it is the individual who decides what is important and how to view it, with that being said this paper is from but one point of view.
My brother is very big in the political scene but prior to watching this documentary, I had no idea that this election at the time was made into what this documentary shows, and I did not even realize that Arnold was married to a Kennedy. As we were watching it, I wrote down two words in all capital letters, JOKE and CIRCUS! To me that seemed to be what this recall was made out to be, nothing but a joke. I really did not think as we watched this show, which is what I felt like this documentary was, that this was actually something that really took place. Even as we watched it, I believed it was a show, until you stated it was real life events that actually happened as the credits were rolling at the end of
On September 11th, 2001, terrorism reached American soil; attacks were specifically made on Lower Manhattan, causing the destruction of every World Trade Center associated building. The attack to this day has still instilled fear of terrorism in our society, and is an event New Yorkers will never forget. Dating back to July 4th, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was signed in the United States, declaring the thirteen colonies free from Great Britain. It is no coincidence that the new 1 WTC, previously known as the Freedom Tower, reaches its maximum height of 1,776 feet. The name “Freedom Tower” was originally used to symbolize America as a nation to rise above the attacks on the original towers. Architectures strategically planned out its symbolic height to match up with its specific chosen name of the building. However, the owners decided to change the building name back to One World Trade Center due to the fact that the building was going to be used as an office building and not for marketing. Nonetheless, many people still refer to 1 WTC as the Freedom Tower. Fast forward ten years later from the attack, on September 11th, 2011, the 9/11 Memorial officially opened for public use. The 9/11 Memorial has not only been one of New York’s biggest tourist destinations that attracts crowds of thousands on a daily basis, but it has also acted as an area that brings back many memories and emotions for those with any association of that day. With the history of the memorial and
This documentary has a voice which is the most important part of any movie, furthermore, it has it own way of living and breathing and speaking to
Last time SPQ spoke with actor and Pittsburgh native Carl Clemons, he was part of HBO’s awarding winning series “The Wire.” Since the show’s conclusion, Carl has kept himself busy with the continued development of his craft through multiple acting roles. “I have learned a lot these past few years through my own trails & tribulations working in the film business,” he shared.