Many Death row inmates endure a plethora of years within a prison, the majority of the time in solitary confinement with no social interaction, very little exposure to the environment, and in a room with bare walls or the necessities: a bed, sink, and toilet along with other hygienic needs such as a toothbrush, toilet paper, etc. Prisoners sit awaiting their execution day for years. Through my research there has been an abundance of evidence examining the situation of whether or not this is ethical/moral. These questions have been addressed, but my research looks at it from a variety of perspectives including the prisoner and family of the victims. Is waiting for one’s execution morally right? What if one is found innocent after 30 years …show more content…
don’t usually occur due to the fact that the extent of the evidence is very clear. The person either committed the crime or did not. Usually with these cases there is not a great deal of uncertainty. On the other hand with capital cases, exoneration count is carefully examined and the trials are conducted in much larger terms. Some of the obvious reasons are due to that fact that the trial involves someone’s life, but also due to the fact that evidence has to be pristine in order to do this. Because of this, many death row inmates are incarcerated for years on end in order for the justice system to confirm that it is indeed the true perpetrator. Throughout the inmate’s prison sentence during the variety of appeals, many inmates develop mental conditions, some even go insane. The most eminent example of this is the case of Leroy Nash. Nash was convicted for multiple counts of murder and armed robbery and was sentenced to death. After 80 years of awaiting his execution, Nash died in prison due to natural causes (Rapaport, N.D.). Nash was said to have many mental health issues that were enhanced while he was incarcerated. He was placed in solitary confinement for the majority of his sentence for twenty three hours a day with one hour of sunlight. This is an issue that arises with death row: due to the appeals and triple checking of all of the evidence, many inmates are incarcerated for an extended period of time. Is the death penalty the
Furthermore, the death penalty system is unreliable. According to a study about capital punishment system by Columbia University Law School, over 60 precent of all capital trials exist serious mistakes. Once the cases were reviewed, 7 present defendants were found completely innocent and more than 80 percent defendants were not sentenced to death again (Errors in Capital Cases).
Even for those justly convicted, are usually still under high amounts of stress, etc. due to their impending deaths.
In the last several years, too many people in the United States have been wrongfully sentenced with the death penalty. Several accused have their sentence overturned or they have been totally exonerated. There are at least 8 people who were executed by United States and later proven innocent (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org). Over a 20 year period, 68% of all death sentences were reversed (http://karisable.com). A noteworthy example is of Jerry Banks who was convicted and sentenced with the death penalty for two counts of murder in 1975. Five years later, in 1980, Banks' conviction was overturned on the basis of newly discovered evidence which was allegedly known to the state at the time of trial. Another example was the case of Lawyer Johnson who was sentenced to death in 1971 by an all white jury for the murder of a white victim. Later in 1982, Johnson’s conviction was overturned and Johnson exonerated when a previously silent eyewitness identified the state’s chief witness as the real murderer. (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org) Human error is inevitable, particularly
To date, since 1989, there have been over 1700 exonerations, or convicts proven innocent, in the United States (“The National Registry of Exonerations”). Recently, there’s been about 10 a month (Pelley). A 2014 study conducted by the National Academy of Sciences claims that 4.1% of people sentenced to death are innocent. It goes on to state that: “With an error rate at trial over 4%, it is all but certain that several of the 1,320 defendants executed since 1977 were innocent.” Furthermore, because capital cases are examined more thoroughly than others, the error rate is
Using the example of the case of Damon Thibodaux, he was taken for questioning after a girl who they were last seen with went missing. She was found strangled and naked (Leo, 2008). A homicide officer took over the case, and Thibodaux was interrogated for several hours. Although Thibodaux repeatedly said he knew nothing about the murder, the interrogation kept going, eventually the officer was able to record a statement from Thibodaux pleading guilty of consensual and non-consensual sex with the victim, beating, and assassinating her. Thibodaux was condemned to death, and was to spend fifteen years on death row and sixteen years in jail before DNA examination confirmed that he was not guilty (Kassin, 2013). Thibodauxs exoneration proceeding concluded that fatigue and exhaustion from the overnight search for the girl, the long interrogation, psychological vulnerability, and fear of the death penalty led to the false confession by Thibodaux (Leo, 2008). This case is a great example of
This is truly why life sentence in more effective in the end. After a criminal is sentenced it can eventually leak out that that inmate is actually innocent. If we execute that inmate, we can't get his life back once we find out he actually was found not guilty. If we sentence them to life, we can release him when we find out the facts that he was not guilty the whole time. The courts can technically face many consequences for this because they did not uncover all the evidence before they executed the inmate. Once you take away a life there isn't any going back to fix it. There has been countless errors in the court system that have resulted in innocent deaths. This can cause families to lose their loved ones, or children to lose their parents when it could have been
In the united states there have been one hundred and sixty two people exonerated from death row since nineteen seventy three. According to deathpenaltyinformation.org (“innocence cases”). Early as last year former death row inmate Isaiah Mccoy was released from death row inmate under the charges of murder “Deputy Attorney General R. David Favata belittled McCoy in front of the jury for choosing to represent himself, made intimidating comments to McCoy during a break in proceedings, then lied to the judge about having made those comments. McCoy waived his right to a jury for his retrial, but was represented by counsel” deathpenaltyinformation.org (“innocence cases”). There was no physical evidence holding Mccoy for the murder upon his release he MCcoy said “ I just want to say to all those out there going through the same thing I'm going through 'keep faith, keep fighting. Two years ago, I was on death row. At 25, I was given a death sentence – and I am today alive and well and kicking and a free man." seeing that a free man was put in jail for a murder he didn't commit and given the death penalty is a scary process I couldn't imagine what McCoy was feeling this is why the death penalty should be
While there are many arguments from supporters for why long term confinement is expectable punishment for the inmates in prison, most popular reason is that it allows prisoner to reflect back on their crime and their victim, which in turn is supposed to aid in the rehabilitation process. But multiple studies and long term data collected across the country have proven that it’s simply not true. Based on information collected by the state of Connecticut (Tsui. 2), inmates who spend time in solitary confinement during their prison sentence were 92% more likely to be rearrested within three years compared to 66% of inmate who were not subjected to such treatment, while information from Texas shows that inmates who were housed in isolation units
While, innocent people are being sentenced to jail time and put on death row because of errors in the criminal justice system. It has been frequently argued that the death penalty leads to a failure and misuse of justice by wrongfully executing an innocent person. Many people have been announced innocent victims of the death penalty. Improper procedure may also result in unfair executions. Since 1973, more than 150 people have been released from death row with evidence of their innocence. California being the state with the biggest amount of death row prisoners since April (2015) with 746.
There are many cases in which people spent years in prison for the crimes they did not commit. Death penalty is permanent and cannot be undone. Many people have been proven innocence after the execution is carried out. If an innocent criminal has received a life sentence then he has the opportunity to be proven innocence in future with more advance investigation. For example in U.S as of September 11, 273 people including 17 death row inmates were exonerated by doing DNA testing. The use of DNA testing helps to confirm if a person is innocent and not sentence him to death. Likewise, in near future with more advance technologies someone can be proven
The first thing that used to run through my mind when I heard that someone had been sentenced to death was the word: guilty. David Wayne Spence and David Junior Brown are only a few of the many that were executed by the judicial system, and later found innocent. There is no way to truly know how many innocent people were executed; because once an execution is carried out most cases are shut. Could a fabricated eye witness testimony play a role in a defendant receiving capital punishment? I know race does. I want to become a forensic psychologist, and a part of my job will be assisting judges with sentences in the court room. There is this question that has been bothering me for awhile now, and I would like to know, how has the United States judicial system addressed the problem of innocent death-row inmates being executed?
You should be aware that there are only thirty-two states that practice and uphold the death penalty in the United States. Within the thirty-two state’s the two leading in execution’s are California and Texas. The most common contributing factor to inmates on death row is mental illness. Medical conditions known as mental illness comes in many different forms. There are categories that consist of insanity, intellectual Function, and mental illness. These categories effect behaviors that interfere with rational thought process and alter moods, feelings, and the ability to function on a daily basis. Mental illness’s such a Bi-Polar disorder, Post-traumatic-stress-disorder,
Great post! I just wanted to add to how long it actually takes for someone to be executed. Typically, an individual on death row spends over a decade waiting to be executed. Because of the of appeals process it extends the amount of time the inmate must await executions. Due to the extensive wait time a number of inmates never actually make it to execution they die of natural causes, suicide, or are killed by other inmates. However, without thorough appeals mistakes can be made and innocent people could be executed.
One of the most recent states to abolish the death penalty is Illinois. It created the Capital Punishment Reform Study to investigate problems in the current capital punishment system and to make recommendations for ways to make it more effective. In a ten year period, it cost the state 200 million dollars in expenses. Illinois believed that fixing the Capital Punishment System was not possible because there are too many problems. The biggest issue is the financial burden on the state. The problem is a direct result of the time it takes to reach an verdict in a death penalty case. Once a person is found guilty, he or she has the right to appeal the decision; those appeals may take between 6-10 years. It is not uncommon for inmates to spend around 25 years on death row before being executed
Every single death row inmates face executions there have been cases that many innocent individuals is waiting to be executed or has been executed. Research lead by Samul Gross, a professor at the University of Michigan Law school stated that “At least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent” (Capital Punishment). But not all men and woman run the same faith; there have been many cases where inmates on death row get a second opportunity in life and get exonerated from death row. For example “As of today, 150 individuals have been exonerated from death row” (National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty). Another significant factor that there is a lot of innocent people on death row it has to do with a false eyewitness and authorities pressuring victims. For example, Kirk Bloodsworth from Maryland who was convicted of a crime he didn't commit in 1984, he was sent to death row by a “false eyewitness identification.” (National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty). How about the case of Ruben Cantu a 17-year-old who has never convicted of crimes. On till he was framed with a capital murder case that took place on November 8, 1984, and sentenced of the murderer. One of the victims and only survivor of the crime gave his statement that Cantu was the killer, he was pressured by the authorities to place Cantu in the scene of the crime. “He