Metallic Balloon Controversy

This establishes the topic and the sides of the debate as well as is a good lead in for some information on

First I am going to cover the negative approach on the debate in the article.

Modern technology has not made the creation of original arguments easy on us. With the progression of the internet, we have access to the answers to virtually any question we have.

Introduce the second main point of the argument. Then, provide evidence from the sources. Multiple pieces of evidence should be provided to support the main point.

Is it worth it to blow up balloons if they have a chance of killing an animal or harming the environment ? For example , balloons harm the earth and waste the world's supply of helium . I personally believe balloons should be banned because of all the harm they can cause to Earth . On the other hand , many people believe they shouldn't be banned because if we dispose them properly no harm is done .

After reading both sides of the arguments I found Dan Coats’ argument most biased because it contained the most propaganda. In my opinion, the oversimplification of what he called the narrative was distracting and seemed informal to me. I understand the importance; however, it could have been presented differently. In addition, his argument contained pseudo

Before we can examine other points of view, let's first lay down the ground rules: there is no disagreement

How is this article/video related to the topics we've been talking about during our classes?

In your paper, acknowledge and describe the other positions, but present convincing evidence as to why your position is superior. Offer refutations of the other theories.

Comparing the message between the message of these videos and the message in the text. I will start by saying that the author of the text and the author of the video are on two separate sides of the fence when speaking about the same topic, the environment, and even more specifically, the population.

Balloons are fun to have at parties but you really don’t need them for anything. There so useless what are you supposed to do with balloons anyway. There weird and kill wildlife that run everywhere. Balloons are killing animals we don't need them if we did we would all have one. But we don't so just keep balloons put away so the animals won't die

Video: Who, in your view, presents the clearest argument? With which of the two arguments presented in the debate do you align yourself?

Could you imagine a world where balloons cease to exist? Balloons are seemingly harmless party decorations, but some people want to do away with them forever Critics say they waste helium, and are perilous to some wildlife. Although, we have was to fix this, including new material, and proper balloon destruction. Claiming, that balloons could get banned one day, and we could lose them; we need ways to insure that we can properly keep our favorite party decoration.

The 3 reason to most likely state my point is be smarter. Don't put the balloons out in the sun, Throw away the balloons when all out of helium, and most of all do not suck on heliums balloons because it will effect your lungs.

What is the best mode of delivery (media) for this argument (website, wiki, Prezi, etc.)?