Military Draft Research Paper

This is why reinstating the draft may possibly be a good thing, because war is heavy burden. With less individuals in an army, more has to be carried by each person. This can cause issues, which may affect the outcome of the war. Responsibility can be divided up among a larger group and the load for each individual is not so restricting. It is also important to remember the cause of the war. It is also vital in determining what is necessary to win the war. This has an effect on the amount of drafts that are issued. Protecting the country and the rights that we all enjoy is something everyone should all be concerned about. It is the responsibility of the nation to protect itself, with whatever means

As stated above, mandatory draft assures national security. This is shown throughout history. The Vietnam War was one prime example. A draft was enabled sending many young men to

At the constant incline of students enlisting in the military and the re-enlistment rate of soldiers being "137%" of the predicted rate, there would be no physical need for a draft. (Griffin)The constant growth of the American Military only proves the fact that a military draft isn't as necessary as it was in previous years, or previous wars, such as the Chinese Civil War, Greek Civil War, First Indochina War, Korean War, and lastly the Second Indochina War, or Vietnam War.

A military draft reflects upon our government in an oppressive light. When I say this I refer to the characteristics of an oppressive government, when a government infringes upon the rights of individuals, and when a government has rights that the citizens themselves do not have. Conscription infringes upon an individual's right to consent as well as the citizens themselves do not have the right to draft others. By the government expecting to be able to perform drafting duties and not allowing citizens the same right presents a double

The United States military eventually became one of low morale and deteriorating race relations. This was contrary to the image we liked to have of our military. Young Americans found that the draft and the war violated their moral and religious ideas (Accettola 169). In the United States, young men should have been able to practice religion and have their own ideas without restraint. Through deferments, exemptions, legal technicalities, and noncombat alternatives, the draft rewarded people with money and power (Stoner and George 77). The draft was contrary to American ideals in that it unfairly rewarded some who had more than others. The draft hurt military efficiency by substituting motivated volunteers for unmotivated draftees. It was bad for troop morale and performance, so it endangered the mission (Bodenner). The draft endangered the American mission in Vietnam by lowering morale and performance, therefore endangering the United States as a

The draft should be reinstated because it would increase support for the army and war. If a draft was put into place everybody would be come from all social and economic classes. Everyone would feel for a stake in victory because a family member would possibly be drafted. War would be more Supported because of this. Those who have personally served in the military often say military service unites all classes and cultures in a shared experience. According to Noel Koch, the man who wrote the proposal ending the military draft while serving as speechwriter in the Nixon White House, “The military did more to advance the cause of equality in the United States than any other law, institution, or movement. Not for nothing did ‘Bro’ come into common

Little may you know but the draft has only been used five times. The Civil war, WW1, WW2, Korea, and in Vietnam. I will tell you why we should keep the draft and why it would be beneficial if we should keep the draft. Keeping the draft would be a good thing because every war we have had a draft in we have won.

In recent years the government has been using the Volunteer System for the military, but the Draft is a far better option because it will actually lead to an end result in the war. When the United States decided to declare their freedom from Great Britain in 1776 they had used a militia service for fighting the Revolutionary War. But, When the United States officially became their own recognized nation in 1783, they needed to start building an official military. At that time they started using Conscription, or as it is more commonly known, a drafting system. This drafting system was used in every single war since then up until the near end of the Vietnam War in in 1973. With that in mind, the draft is something that should be reimplemented because the United States has never lost a war that only used the draft, the draft was effective at allowing the United States of America to win the war, and the All Volunteer Service has not been able to bring about the same winning results as the draft had done.

As mentioned above, military officials see the draft as unnecessary. In addition to these officials, public opposition to the draft is growing. According to a survey, 80 percent of Americans opposed the draft in 2007 (Text 5, graphic). If the majority of the country opposes something that would directly affect its youth, then that something should not be reinstituted. Public opinion on the reinstitution of the draft reflects the opposition that would be present if it were reinstituted. Draft-eligible Americans would most certainly try to find a way out of military service, as draftees have done in the past. But because the public opinion on the draft has shifted dramatically since 1980, where 59 percent of Americans were in favor of the draft, the resentment associated with serving would most likely be higher (Text 5, graphic). This resentment is almost inevitable, especially with pro-draft arguments claiming the need to serve in the military in exchange for citizenship rights (Text 1, line 61). Rights granted by citizenship should not have requirements in order to make use of them; that is why one is granted these rights with U.S. citizenship and not after serving in the military. Not only are citizens’ rights at stake, but also the right to education. Bill Maxwell argues that serving in the military should be a requirement in order to attend college (Text 3, line 45). Military service as a requirement for college would definitely

As you can tell, if the draft was reinstated many disputes would start to take place. Families all over the United States would have to go through the pain of their children being forced to leave their home. There are so many people who want to be in the military, there is almost no need for a mandatory draft. With this is mind, those who are drafted are not are not near as dedicated as the troops who are in, or are wanting to be in the military. Reason being, is that they

Prior to the expiration of the draft in 1973, our country sent the military overseas 27 times. Since 1973 with an all volunteer military we have deployed troops 175 times. This is because it is easier to send into battle those who have chosen the military as their occupation, instead of sending into battle those who have not. Charles Rangel, the most senior member of the US House of Representatives, weighed in on the matter, saying “Too few of the country’s leaders have a personal stake in the well-being of the Armed Forces.” This means that the leaders of today do not have that a personal attachment to the wellbeing of the armed forces. He also said “Since the end of the draft in 1973, every president, Democrat and Republican alike, has approached warfare with the mind-set of invading, occupying, and expanding our nation’s influence...We make decisions about war without worry over who fights them. Those who do the fighting have no choice; when the flag goes up, they salute and follow orders.” This basically means that the leaders only have interest in the invasion and occupation of a land without giving too much thought about soldiers. If the was a draft maybe the leader would care more about when sending troops in.In conclusion draft should be reinstated because it would decrease the amount of military force used by the government. In conclusion The draft should be reinstated because it would decrease the amount of military force used by the

The idea of reinstating a draft comes with pros and cons as most ideas do. A draft for the United States of America would make it compulsory for all American male of Female between certain ages to serve the country for a limited amount of time. This idea would make everyone share a sense of responsibility to the country. When looking at the people who opt-in to selective services every year, it is noticed they consist primarily of people who come from a household with low social economic status. Why should the children from higher social economic status not enlist in the army when their family profit from wars. The draft will educate people on the responsibility and result of going to war, promoting the togetherness in order to keep peace

Having the draft and requiring that they either serve or go to jail is going to disrupted their career path or taint their background when trying to get future jobs. If a person were to refuse the draft and get sent to jail, then when they are finally released and they try to apply for a job, that charge could appear on the background check of the person and prevent them from getting a job. On the other hand, when they decide to join rather than be put into jail, they are taken away to train for military combat. That means that they are also taken away from being able to improve their skills in their career field. Not only will they lose the time to improve their skills in their career but they will also begin to lose skills that they gained from the career. They will be so focused on fighting, staying alive and how much time they have left being in the war that once they return to their job they will have to be trained again. Making their lives harder and the employers lives

According to Ms. Baltay, over the course of the war 50,000 Americans died and three times that number were injured. Forcing its own people to go fight in a warzone is the opposite of protection, and it is dangerous. Since people in the United States are given the right by the government to pursue life, liberty, and happiness, it entitles them to the right not to participate in the draft if it will prevent them from pursuing these goals. If the government were to set up a draft that would take people away from their right to life, liberty, and happiness, then the government would be overstepping its job and would have to throw out the Constitution. The people who avoided the draft had a perfectly ethical reason do so, because the government had not kept its side of Locke’s

“War is delightful to those that have no experience of it.” A quote by Desiderius Erasmus, a Dutch humanist and social critic, shows tells that war isn’t always as epic and awesome that most Americans make it out to be. Reinstating the draft might sound like a great way to impose our power on the world furthering the American agenda, as well as enforcing the American ideal of extreme pride in nationalism. The problem is however, that most Americans that want the draft reinstated have no clue about the mountain of problems that it would create. America would be in very dire straits if the draft were necessary. The last time America used the draft was during the Vietnam War and that draft did indeed fit those three requirements. The draft should only be used under three crucial prerequisites. If it does not meet these requirements then the draft should not be reinstated. Those three pretenses are: America is in an extreme conflict, every U.S citizen able would be entered in the draft and it would need to be a lottery type system.