Military Leadership Research Paper

Three qualities important in life, but even more so in being a successful USMA cadet and Army officer are honor, responsibility, and determination. These traits will allow a person to be a powerful leader, follower, and soldier in general.

Independent of the Army and country you serve, leadership is always an important subject. There are many civilian books and military manuals talking about leadership. The United States Army divides the subject leadership in three levels. These levels are Direct Leadership, Organizational Leadership, and Strategic Leadership. In this paper, the focus will be only about the first two levels. According with you rank, you will work more in one of these levels. Because of that, most part of time there is not much interaction between higher-level leaders and lower level leaders. Despite the limited interaction between higher level leaders like Brigade commanders with the lower level leader like company commander it’s not affect a satisfactory mission accomplishment.

"Leadership is the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation to accomplish the mission and improve the organization" (Mills, 2013). The Army measures its leaders by their attributes and their core leader competencies. Also, a leader must be able to train, coach and mentor their subordinates. Additionally, the Army has three levels of leadership: Direct, Organizational, and Strategic. An effective leader understands and practices these qualities at an operational level.

An Army Leader is able and willing to act decisively, within the intent and purpose of his superior leaders, and in the best interest of the organization. Army leaders recognize that organizations built on mutual trust and confidence, successfully accomplish peacetime and wartime missions.” (2006, P. Viii). Balance molds a leader and in turn, an effective leader is a proactive person who works a whole lot smarter. President George Bush (1997) states, “Leadership to me means duty, honor, and country; It means character and it means listening from time to time.” (Adrain, p. 35).

APD 6-22 defines a leader as anyone who by virtue of assumed role or assigned responsibility inspires and influences people to accomplish organizational goals. As a “street to seat” guy I do not have prior leadership experience as an NCO, but as I have progressed as a Warrant Officer I have learned a great deal about leadership. For this discussion post I will discuss two topics: what I’ve learned about being a leader as a Warrant Officer, and how decentralized leadership is utilized in my unit.

“Leadership is the process of leaders inducing followers to act for certain goals that represent the values and motivations, the wants and needs, the aspirations and expectations of both leaders and followers” To be able to do this, a person must come up with their own leadership philosophy. Throughout this paper, I will tell you the leadership philosophy I will have for my organization. I will explain how I came up with this philosophy. Also I will tell what leadership traits, and characteristics that I believe are important for a leader to possess and how they apply to my leadership philosophy for the success of my organization. In conclusion I will summarize my interview with a squadron commander about their most challenging issue and

My philosophy on Army leadership comes from both the NCO creed and ADP 6-22. Leadership is defined as the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation to accomplish the mission and improve the organization (ADP 6-22). As an element of combat power, leadership unifies the other elements of combat power (information, mission command, movement and maneuver, intelligence, fires, sustainment and protection). Confident, competent, and informed leadership intensifies the effectiveness of the other elements of combat power. (ADRP 6-22).

In the world today, ideological differences are the root causes of many conflicts between individuals or nations and if allowed to aggravate, it becomes the brush strokes for a canvas that turn out to be the portrait of an all-out warfare. However, before countries engage in militarism, it is prudent that the leadership takes pragmatic steps towards a peaceable resolution because the misconception among architects of conflict is to further private agenda for their personal benefit. In a blind quest for gratification, these benefits are an opportunity cost for the larger society who is the unfortunate recipient of the ensuing anarchy. Nothing is fair in war; casualties caught up within the crossfire

I want to become a military officer to obtain greater responsibility, increase my circle of influence, and execute orders that benefit the mission and those carrying out the assignment. I strongly believe in mission first and people always. I believe one can carry out the mission first and people always by focusing on readiness and providing exceptional servitude to your subordinates. Through-out my career I have witnessed extraordinary warrant officers lead by example by exercising the basics; purpose, direction, and motivation. These leaders are technical experts and the work horses of the unit. I desire to be the epitome of these great leadership role models. My ambition in my pursuits are to become an army aviator and execute the fore

When we think of the Army we normally think about soldiers in combat. On the contrary the Army is predominately made up of support soldiers. The profession of arms according to the training and doctrine command Commanding General (2010) "is unique because of the lethality of our weapons and our operations. Soldiers are tasked to do many things besides combat operations, but ultimately the core purpose and reason for the Army exits is to apply lethal force" (p.2). As a human resource sergeant our role plays a significant part in the Army profession. We must work effectively in order to ensure that all soldiers are well taken care of. Our expertise and knowledge about certain entitlements, family care plans, promotions, and so much more helps us gain the trust of those Soldiers in the Army. Human resource sergeants provide these types of services which in turn helps promote morale and welfare within units, for example a Soldier is generally happy on the

I have gone through many interviews, military or not, there are always similar questions. Are you a leader? How would you describe yourself as a leader? What makes a good leader? The first thought comes to mind when asked these questions, especially the last one, is “define a leader? What do you mean by good?” I think for a bit, but I always answer the questions the same way.

What is leadership? How does society define as good and bad leaders? What are the traits most embodied by the successful leaders? These questions, along with many other, have been the topic of debate for centuries. Defining leadership in hard terms can be a challenging thing. In one hand, soldiers in the Army, for instance, can recite the definition of a leadership that came out of a publication. On the contrary, most soldiers will struggle to define what leadership means to them, in their words. However, troops in any organization can quickly identify who is a bad or a good leader. They know what right looks and feels like, though, putting it into terms can prove to be more challenging, and goes to demonstrate why it is

group.I believe that is very true, however with the Military rapidly growing, and becoming more

Leadership is an important aspect of life in the military and in the civilian world. In both sectors, one will work with others, work for others, and having others work for him. Learning how to follow and lead effectively is essential to success in this world of human collaboration. As midshipmen, we learn leadership through not only our leadership classes, but also our daily lives and roles here at the United States Naval Academy. The lessons and principles we learn from class relate directly to our life in the halls and on the Yard and make us better followers, leaders, and people.

What is leadership? This is a question I’ve been asked numerous times throughout my eighteen year Coast Guard career. It’s one that I’ve always contemplated but never took the time to explore further. The longer I serve and the more I learn, the more my vision on leadership changes and develops. I’ve been extremely fortunate over the course of my career to be part of several successful units and took part in critical operations that provided assistance to those in need while simultaneously carrying out maritime law enforcement. Looking back, the one thing these units had in common were good leaders, ones who told it like it was while directing and leading their people to the completion of a common goal or shared vision. While I could go on and on about specific individuals and their attributes but I believe highlighting their commonalities is more effective. They each had a unique way of leading, but all encouraged inspired and promoted team work while allowing each member to maintain individuality. They listened attentively and provided feedback that was congruent to the conversation or issue.