Mitford Pokes Fun At American Summary

Mitford’s tone can be described as comical. Mitford provides a humorous take on embalming by calling the process a “drama” in paragraph one. She also explains the process of embalming by listing off many different words, which hint at the extremely detailed and sarcastic process to be described ahead, in paragraph two.

In the essay “The Embalming of Mr. Jones,” (1963), Jessica Mitford is describing a procedure of embalming of a corpse. She writes that people pay a ton of money each year, but “not one in ten thousand has any idea of what actually takes place,” and it is extremely hard to find books and any information about this subject. She assumes that it must be a reason for such secrecy, and may be if people knew more about this procedure, they would not want this service after their death.

Mitfords tone is witty. She shows her attitude towards her subject by using words like “pickled, trussed, creamed…” to compare the embalming process to that of preparing food. It almost makes the audience think she is making a joke out of the gruesome processes.

The tone of Mitford’s essay “Behind the Formaldehyde Curtain” reflects her disapproval of the embalming process. To illustrate, she uses harrowing words like “subjected” and “gruesomeness” to convey a message of disgust and unease within the readers. It is good she wrote her essay in a simple and satiric way, so that it is very easy for the common man to read and comprehend it, while the comedy and horrible detail leaves the terrible imagery of the embalming procedures in one’s mind long after reading. Texts like this one, and ones similar to it are very important as society evolves. It would seem that many people would read this and it would greatly influence whether they would want their family members embalmed or even what they would desire

“Is it worse to kill someone than to let someone die?” – James Rachels. At the end of the disagreement, many philosophers say euthanasia, also known as physician-assisted suicide, is a compassionate method of death. At the other side are the opponents of euthanasia, who may consider this technique as a form of murder. In this paper, I will show that it is not important to know the distinction between killing and letting die on request which is performed by a physician. Both killing and letting die on request are similar because it is based on the controversial issue called euthanasia also known as physician-assisted suicide.

Dead?" AlterNet. In this article, Frankie Colmane looks into how dead bodies are treated in the United State even after Mitford's expose of the funeral industry was published. The article takes both a philosophical and scientific issue with the procedure of embalming sighting proven negative effects to human beings and the environment. Colmane shows that even though people are aware of the malfeasance and misappropriations of the funeral industry following pieces like Mitford's, very little has changed. Therefore problems that have been discussed in earlier works should not be forgotten. Rather they should be continually brought up until the issue is solved. During the 1800s, embalming became common practice because the dead family member would lie in state within the home for a period of days or weeks until it would be buried (Colmane 2010). The article shows the duplicity such as when "funeral directors were arguing forcefully against charges that their mediation between the living and the dead translated into social obstruction that barred the stricken from facing death with maturity, realism, and honest" (page 2). This article will be used to illustrate that things have not changed with funereal practices despite the publication of Mitford's essay.

A Life or Death Situation, by Robin Marantz Henig, New York Times, July, 2013, is a review of the debate surrounding the right to a dignified death. It examines the purely philosophical view of the issue; as well as the heart wrenching reality of being faced with that question in one 's personal life. Does a person have a right to choose how he or she dies? How does that choice impact the people who care about about him or her? Should a person who cares about someone be required to cause or aide in his or her death? These questions weigh heavy on the minds of many people, who live

Physician-assisted suicide: Death with dignity addresses morality and ethics involved with physician-assisted suicide or PAS. History of euthanasia is given, dating back to ancient civilizations. PAS models in other countries besides the United States are explained in detail. The author addresses

Due to it’s uncomfortable and sad nature, the Death with Dignity act has become very controversial. With the U.S population nearly split evenly on this topic, with 47% of the population in support of it and 49% in opposition to it, there have been many pros and cons discussed for these acts (Lipka). Many supporting the Death with Dignity act believe it is the patient 's right to decide to die. Others opposing counter this with the fact that premature death is unnatural and immoral in their eyes. People also argue that the Death with Dignity act allows the patients have a more peaceful more controlled death giving them and their families more closure as they reach their end. Opposers believe that palliative care is the answer to a more peaceful end. Some in support believe that people

In a free society, people’s bodies and the ownership of their bodies is a basic right and freedom. The freedom to do as they choose with their own bodies is intrinsic in that freedom. It is not only the right of human being but also if they are Americans, according to the Declaration of Independence “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” This essay presents a short chronological over view of the evolution of assisted suicide, from history, present day, and future of this issue in the United States. The historical evidence of death with dignity reveals the strong position that “the right to die is a prochoice issue.” With the growing support for assisted suicide the legislation of it will have to be settled state by state. Even if the government doesn’t legalize it, the government should at least decriminalize it. With the decriminalization of assisted suicide, it would no longer make individuals and their physician felons. It would give individuals their right to do with their body as they want. Similarly to the decimalization of doing what you want to your body through the use of alcohol, tobacco and marijuana.

While many define euthanasia as physician-assisted suicide with “informed and voluntary consent” or “a gentle and easy death,” (80) others view it in a more demeaning light, but with reasonable concerns. From its beginning rooted in the fifteenth century to the recent efforts for its legalization, the practice of euthanasia has become a very controversial issue. In J Donald Boudreau’s commentary, “Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia,” he argues against legalizing euthanasia because it would challenge the traditional medical values, ideals, and instruction of healing.

The term “embalming” is a familiar one in today’s society; however, many people are unaware of what happens during its process. Depending upon the family’s wishes, a body may or may not be embalmed. Culture can also play a part in making that decision. Embalming is a simple process with rich history that does wonders for a body and families.

The demands for cremations is now at its peak especially when the Catholic Church permitted the cremation as a legitimate mode of disposing the dead body, and it was justified the existence of

The legalization of euthanasia has always been a highly debatable topic since it causes philosophical, religious, moral and ethical controversy where some people believe it reduces our respect for the value of human life and it will be a gateway for other immoral actions to be normalized even though it is a basic human right that patients all over the world are denied to this day.

The lack of consensus; thereof, in American society on the ethical question of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide could be attributed solely to the incredibly complexity and gravity of the issue. Therefore, in this study I will suggest, explore, and discuss that part of the ethical problem with euthanasia is under what circumstances, if any,