preview

Monster By Walter Dean Myers Sparknotes

Decent Essays

Every human being on Earth has a different perception on justice, innocence and guilt. In the book Monster, the author Walter Dean Myers explores on this topic in an unusual way. The protagonist, Steve Harmon, writes about his experience on trial and in jail. Steve tells it through a screenplay for a movie, where he is the main character, but the thing that is fascinating about this idea is the way Steve presents his innocence. The reader is able to scrutinize his thoughts and feelings from his journal entries to have a better grasp of what happened. Being able to read these entries from Steve Harmon it is clear teller of his guilt. The protagonist, Steve Harmon, is guilty of association in the murder trial, because his journal entries conflicting …show more content…

It's obvious to see this evidence would have incriminated him, just because of what a huge coincidence that Steve to be at the very same drugstore on that very day the crime occurred. Especially since some “acquaintances” Steve knew came to rob the store as soon as he left. With any case that has little to no evidence, it is very hard to pinpoint who is lying, especially when criminals are involved. During the trial the evidence points to James King being the main perpetrator, who organized this crime. It would have been easy for him to gather people to take part in this robbery, but King must have been very careful who to pick. If he told the wrong person his plan, they could have snitched to the police and gotten King in trouble. It is somewhat strange that King would have asked Steve, a clean cut kid, to take action in this illegal behavior. King must have been certain of Steve’s trustworthiness to include …show more content…

You know, check the place out -make sure ain’t no badges copping z’s in the back. You down for it?” (Myers 150) But when Steve is being asked about his familiarity of James King, he responses with “I know him from the neighborhood” and how he spoke to King “Once in awhile”. Isn’t it very strange for King to ask a kid, who he isn’t close with to take part in criminal activity? Later in his testimony Steve even says he “doesn’t remember most of of our conversations” (Myers 225), but if someone was told about a robbery they would most likely remember it. So far these two examples show Steve is an untrustworthy narrator and lied in his testimony multiple times, which makes the reader question if he lying any other

Get Access