In this section, I will report the results of my survey, compare, and contrast them to my own initial theory leanings. A screen shot of the results is in Figure 1. My psychodynamic score is 68% with sub-scores of 83% Psychoanalysis, 63% Analytical and 58% Individual Psychology. My Cognitive-Behavior Score is 87% with sub-scores of 93% Behavioral, 96% REBT, 100% Congnitive-Behavioral and 61% Reality therapy. My Existential Humanist Score is 77% with sub-scores of 65% Existential, 85% Person-Centered and 83% Gestalt. My PostModern Score is 61% with sub-scores of 71% Narrative and 51% Solution-Focused.
As stated in the Psychodynamic section of our textbook, “…they all suggest that an unconscious and conscious affect the functioning of the person in some deeply personal and “dynamic” ways. They all look at early child-rearing practices as being important in the development of personality. They all believe that examining the past, and they dynamic interaction of the past with conscious and unconscious factors, are important in the therapeutic process.” (Neukrug, 2010) My personal theory follows these same ideas. I believe deeply that we are a combination of genetics and experiences. Our experiences greatly influence our development. The effect of those experiences can be at a conscious or unconscious level. The two theories that we have studied to date (psychoanalysis and analytical) differ from my own theory in a couple of major ways. Freud’s theory very heavily
There are numerous debates in regards to developmental psychology. One of the main debates to begin with is nature vs nurture; some individuals believe that we are products of our environment while others regards us while others believe that we are products of our genetics. John Locke believes that when we are born we are a “tabula rasa” a blank slate
To begin, the psychodynamic theory is based on Freud’s psychoanalytic theory and primarily focuses on the role of the unconscious mind in the development of personality. The psychodynamic theory includes the idea that people have defense mechanisms. Psychological defense mechanisms are ways of dealing with anxiety through unconsciously distorting one’s perception of reality, such as denial and repression. In addition, sexual impulses play a large role in the psychodynamic theory. According to Freud, part of personality is outside of awareness, unconscious. The unconscious has difficulty retrieving material and is well below the surface of awareness. Also, the past is important in the psychodynamic theory. There are some advantages and disadvantages to this theory. For instance, the advantages are: psychodynamic theory recognizes the importance of childhood; other theorists after Freud have revised the approach to be less controversial, and this theory has been
Psychoanalytic Theory was originated by Freud, and he proposed that early childhood experiences directly determine our actions and motives throughout adulthood. Freud also believed that there are three structures to personality, which include the id, ego and superego. This fits into my worldview by reminding me how fragile our minds are. What we experience in the past definitely plays a factor in our futures. Keeping this in mind, it is important to be consistent in our interactions with children, because being anything but encouraging will only cause discouragement (Colossians 3:21).
Psychodynamics is an umbrella term, specifically an approach to psychology which highlights personality through unconscious psychological processes. The underlying cause of psychodynamics is to understand why many people act in ways that may not make sense as well as to identify the relationship between unconscious motivation and conscious motivation. The psychodynamic approach is made up of different theories and therapies founded by various psychologists which focus closely on an individual’s unconscious drives, and see how these drives relate to one’s personality. The most prominent psychologists who have contributed to the psychodynamic approach include Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, Alfred Adler, Erik Erikson, and Karen Horney. Unlike the behavior approach to psychology which leans towards understanding the science behind behavior and how external factors help stimulate these behaviors, psychodynamics attempts to look into one’s mind and observe how they see the world from their unique point of view. The psychodynamic approach is the most influential approach in the field of psychology because it emphasizes how unconscious forces impact an individual’s present behavior, unlike other approaches to psychology which focus on one’s past behaviors influencing their present behavior.
Psychoanalytic theory explains about importance of unconscious motivation and early experience in development (Clarke, 2000).
The psychodynamic theory would explain an individual’s personality in terms of conscious and unconscious forces, such as unconscious desires and beliefs. In the early 20th century, Sigmund Freud proposed the psychodynamic theory consists of the id (accountable for instincts and pleasure-seeking), the superego (attempts to submit to the rules of parents and society), and the ego (which facilitates between the id and superego according to the stresses of reality) (Cherry, n.d.). Psychodynamic theories believe childhood experiences shape a person’s personality.
Psychodynamic theories may vary in their individual descriptions of intrapsychic and psychosocial processes and forces, but most follow concepts from Freudian psycho-analysis. There are five main key concepts regarding the psychodynamic theory. The first, the importance of early childhood experiences in personality development. Second, the existence of unconscious and preconscious motivation, unconscious is the part of the mind that holds ideas, thoughts, and memories that we cannot access and bring into our conscious awareness (Canda, Chatterjee, and Robbins, 2012). In contrast, preconscious holds ideas, thoughts, and memories that we are not currently thinking of, but if we concentrate, we can bring those to our conscious part of mind (Canda,
The psychodynamic methodology considers both nature and nurture while the behaviourist approach just considers the nurture side of the debate. In the psychodynamic approach, Freud guaranteed that adult personality is the result of inherent drives (nature) and childhood experiences (nurture). These inborn drives include the structure of the personality, the Id, Ego and Superego and, in addition, the psychosexual stage of development
The psychodynamic view states that personality is the primary unconscious behavior. Freud believed that our mind is mainly unconscious rather than being conscious. There are ego's, superego's, and the ID. The psychodynamic theory is based on Freud's psychoanalytic theory and includes the idea that people have defense mechanism. There are also impluses such as sexual and aggressive and play a role in our personality. Most of our signication parts of our personality occurs during the unconscious stage. The past is greatly important and impacts our future.
The psychodynamic theory holds the view that childhood experiences shape personality. While according to American Psychological Association (2018) describe Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) as a treatment that has been demonstrated to be effective for a range of problems including depression, anxiety disorders, alcohol and drug use problems, marital problems, eating disorders and severe mental illness. The psychodynamic theory takes into translation both nature and nurture, in any case, the cognitive theory has fizzled to recognize the impact of nature and nurture. Sigmund Freud claimed that adult identify is the item of innate drives (nature) and childhood encounter (nurture).
Although these perspectives have different bases of key ideas, all of them are aimed at the same goal of understanding human behavior and development. The psychodynamic perspective is based on the thought that the behavior a person exhibits throughout his or her life is motivated by some unconscious inner force that can be traced back to the individual’s childhood. According to this
I believe that every person develops a unique personality influenced by relationships and experiences established during childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. For instance, parents, caregivers, and guardians are responsible to help a child develop a personality through the boundaries that are set, the communication that is established, and the social support received. What we are exposed to as children and throughout our life will influence our behavior and feelings as adults. For example, an abused child is likely to develop an inferiority complex and can acquire a self-concept of inadequacy. Psychodynamic theory focuses on childhood experiences to help understand the client and make sense of their relationships, experiences, and how they
There are a plethora of ideas and theories regarding the developmental psychology behind why people metamorphosize into different personalities and habits later in life. Developmental psychologists have developed several ways to try and determine where the determining factors are in peoples’ lives that cause the differences. Several of the theories tend to have overlaps in parts of the ideas such as the ideas of “nature vs nurture” and that of “social context.” These theories share the overlapping ideas that there are outside influences on the way a person turns out in life. While “nature vs nurture” states that there are outside influences, there is also a counterargument that the genetic make-up of a person is the determining factor for how that person develops later. Even still, there are some who also believe that both arguments of “nature vs nurture” have even attributes on the lives of people.
What if I told you that your childhood experiences and unconscious desires influence your current and/or future behavior? Would you believe that your past has any effect on your present and could even change your sense of personality? According to the Psychoanalytic Theoretical Perspective, our behavior is determined by the past experiences left in our unconscious mind. However, in my opinion, there are several pros and cons to this theoretical perspective, some having justifiable meanings and others not so much.
There are many arguments that have generated from the assumption that, human being is a product of his environment likewise; (McLeod, 2013), “nothing they say happen by chance, whatever a man does or say must have being thought about beforehand”. It is not unconscious, the theory made use of conflictual statement for instance, every behavior and feeling is deeply rooted in the unconscious mind, which means, what one does, is not being aware or not preplan, also, childhood experiences are also affects a person’s behavior and feeling. All the experiences a man has right from childhood age influence the character or personality of a person. It is widely argued that all behavior has a cause, whether conscious or unconscious action has being preconceived or determined. As long as nothing is new, whatever happens to a man has being happening in the past, the same scenarios applicable to attitude. Little information or experience exposed to right from childhood age does make impact on the later development of a person.