In the chapter of Allies and Enemies In the Asia- Pacific War (1937- 45) in the book Making of the Rape of Nanking by Yoshida Tadashi, Yoshida illustrated the change of attitude of Chinese government toward the Nanking Massacre in 1938 during the League of Nations in Geneva. He argued “Because China’s principal appeal at the League of Nations was to European powers that could recall gas and air attacks from World War I, it made sense to emphasize similar current assaults by the Japanese military” (36), that the Chinese government condemned the usage of gas weapons and air attacks in the whole picture of atrocity of Japanese army cross the whole country instead of focussing solely on Nanking Massacre, is to catch the attention of delegates …show more content…
Wellington Koo, the delegate of Republic of China put Nanking Massacre at the central evidence of his speech, depicting the miserable state of Chinese civilians to condemn Japan and to call for the aid of other countries. However his argument was not rewarded with the attention of other countries, which made him and the government to give up using Nanking Massacre as the example of Japanese atrocity.
The second one is the Europe having enduring the calamity of chemical weapons during World War I was reason for the Chinese government to turn to stress the atrocity by giving the massive bombing and gas weapons caused by the Japanese army. As using the example of Nanking massacre was not effective, the government questioned if it was because the Nanking Massacre was not something the European delegates can relate to. As a result, they talked about the air attacks and gas weapons usage of Japanese army to try to appeal the European countries to feel the pain and to help China.
Instead of giving first hand narratives of the Nanking Massacre, this historical research article revealed how the Chinese government afterward view this
In December of 1937, the Japanese Imperial Army invaded Nanking, China. They killed 300,00 out of the 600,000 people in China’s capital city. The six-week rampage by the Japanese is now known as the Rape of Nanking and the single worst atrocity during WWII era in either the European or Pacific theaters of the war.
The retaliation of the Japanese had the world concerned by the oppression of military actions and to reveal power during the modern era (1900’s). The strategy of the Japanese
The massacre occurred over six weeks, the Japanese soldiers committed horrible crimes including looting, rape, murder and another large number of civilians and prisoners of war. The massacre is such a brutal, about 300 thousand people died, it had become a shame for China, which causing Chinese people have a bad impression on the Japanese. And another example is also happened in the World War II, in August 1945, the America dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, more than eight million Japan citizens are killed and about thirty-five thousand people are injured. The Unites States used the atom bomb to end the war because they wanted to protect their citizens, they trying the lower the rate of deaths. Wars are always connected to death, but not everyone understands the way of saving .
Throughout The Rape of Nanking, the brutal massacre of thousands of innocent Chinese citizens is brought forth through the invasion of this ancient city taken over by the Imperial Japanese army. Iris Chang illustrates the graphic details of the murder and rape of these victims through the perspectives of different sides of the attack. Chang; furthermore, ties in the mass genocide and destruction displayed throughout the book with the example of the Japanese government’s desperate attempt to cover up the incident and the reluctance of the survivors to discuss it. In addition, the horrifying events of The Rape of Nanking only further motivated an uncontrollable desire for aggression, violence, and imperialism in the Asian community evidently
Wild Swans by Jung Chang takes us on a journey through the multiple regime changes in China in the 20th century through the perspective of her grandmother, mother, and herself. Through their perspectives we get firsthand accounts on the events in China leading to the Communist Revolution. For the purpose of this paper I will be focusing on the events up to the Communist takeover of mainland China. The book is far from short on shock value as Chang provides the reader with grizzly accounts of the treatment of people under the Japanese. Her mother also describes her own rationale essentially for wanting to join the Communists in overthrowing the Nationalist government.
World War II was a devastating war, whether you were directly in the war zone, or away from the battlefield, you were impacted greatly. Flyboys is a book written by James Bradley, in this book Bradley tells stories of World War II using first-hand accounts. In chapter five, Bradley discusses “The Rape of China” which was a battle that took place in 1937 during the beginning of World War II. In this battle, the Japanese fight the Chinese and destroy China. Both Japan and China had very different moral beliefs on fighting in the war. China believed that the soldiers needed to “be courteous,” and to also be “neither selfish nor unjust” to civilians (Bradley 54). Meanwhile, the Japanese had totally opposite policies known as the “Three Alls” meaning
For most of history, the Japanese army was not known for brutality in times of war. But the Rape of Nanking was very different than anything then the world had seen before (BBC News). To start off, there are many origins of genocide and ways to describe it, as well as different stages that compose genocide itself. In this genocide, China was invaded and the people residing there were discriminated and harmed by the Japanese army. However, genocide isn’t just one process. There are eight complex stages to every genocide that takes place on Earth, including the Rape of Nanking. Finally, the Chinese were devastated by the end of this genocide, which shows just the horror that they were put through by the Japanese. The Rape of Nanking, which
“In 1933, Japan occupied Jehol Province, not including Chahar and Hopei, and wanted the Hopei as a demilitarized zone” (Hua-ling 56). In 1935, the Japanese forced the Chinese to withdraw from their stations in Hopei and Chahar and also ended all activities in the area. In September, Foreign Minister Hirota Koki, presented The Three Principles of Hirota to the Chinese government demanding that China should stop using American and European influence to maintain friendship, China should recognize Manchukuo, and that Japan and China mst establish a common defense against communism (Hua-ling 58). After Japan withdrew from the League of Nations, they were no longer going for world peace (Morley 72). “The Nanking Massacre refers to an exceedingly horrible massacre of civilians by the Japanese army during a six-week period from December 1937 to January 1938 after its occupation of Nanking, then the capital of the Republic of China” (Taso). General Iwane Matsui, the commanding officer in Shanghai, and the cabinet argued that the capture of Nanking would convince the nationalist government to settle the incident (Morley 74). Even before the Rape of Nanking, the Japanese had tried to use their power to force China to do things against their
They slaughtered thousands of Chinese civilians during the rape of Nanking in 1937. It was necessary for America to drop the bomb.
The conflict between the Allies and the Axis was a horrific and deadly one, which consisted of genocide and mass bombings. Innocent citizens were killed with the estimated sixty million casualties, which lead to the question as to the morality of the different actors—Germany, Japan, England and America— in WWII. In order to truly assess their guilt, meaning their moral innocence, each country will be measured upon the morality of their intent and execution of the different controversial mass killings that Germany (the Holocaust), Japan (Nanking), and the Allied forces (Dresden and Hiroshima) took part in. This hierarchy of evil can be judged upon how Japan’s tyranny and the Allies’ area bombing compare to the genocide performed by Germany. Similarly, these countries will be judged on the whether these different acts were premeditated versus in response to another act, as well as the proportionality to which these acts were carried out. This measurement of evil places each party on an overall scale, which depicts the total guilt that each country or countries deserve. WWII exemplifies that while war is an unavoidable aspect of human nature, there is no such thing as a just war. Similarly, while there is a definite hierarchy of morality between the different actors of WWII, each of the countries at play are immoral in their intent and execution of the attacks on opposing countries.
Between 1031 and 1937, the Japanese army had invaded Manchuria and created a demilitarized zone in east Hubei and a Mongolian puppet state around Charchar and fought with Chinese in Shanghai. Fumimaro Konoe became prime minister in mid-1937, but the army which had conducted the war largely independently had taken over many position within the government. In China, Chiang Kai Shek, realizing he would have little support from the Leauge of Nations, strengthened the relationship with Nazi Germany to improve his armies. And with war loaming, he had united many of the warlords and communists into a united front. But some like the Guangxi Clique and Shanxi ran virtually independent states. And Xin Jiang was in a state of war and under Soviet influence. Plus, after years of war, China’s army was left weak. But in early 1937, Japanese soldiers, who had conducted military exercises outside Beijing for decades, exchanged fire with Chinses soldiers. The Japanese army responded to this, the Marco Polo bridge incident, with a full-scale invasion without support from Konoe. Within month they quickly captured Beijing and Tianjin, crushed a mutiny in Hubei and continued South to
During Second-Sino War, the Chinese were extremely worried about air raids from the Japanese. “Many thousands of Chinese were killed in the indiscriminate bombing of cities by the Japanese air force” (HISTORY). In Lindo Jong’s story she explains that many people did not attend her wedding because they confused storm lightning with bombs. The Japanese also raided Chinese villages and attacked innocents. Japanese are historically merciless therefore “massacres and atrocities were common” in the Second Sino-Japanese War (HISTORY). Jing-mei Woo’s mother tells her story of traveling back to Kweilin and discovering slaughtered bodies from the works of Japanese soldiers. There is no help for Jing-mei Woo’s mother in Kweilin so she is forced to leave
Then I read the book, “The Making of the ‘Rape of Nanking’”, which reminds me of
Both Japan and China lie in the East of Asia. To a certain extent,Japan and China own similar culture background, in the Confucian Cultural Circle. But when we look back into the modern history development, Japan and China made quite different decisions when facing the western countries’ aggression. China suffered the invasion in 1840 after the first Sino-British War. Japan was in a similar situation in the black boat incident in 1853, the Opium War made the West began to pay attention to East Asia. From then on, Japan began to face the western culture. The reactions, as well as the result of Japan and China were quite disparate. This article wants to discuss what lead to the difference.
In 1937 300,000 soldiers and civilians were killed and almost 80,000 women were sexually assaulted, this was the Nanking massacre. The Japanese just defeated the Chinese in a bloody battle and now they were going after the capital Nanking. The leader of China was fearful of the Japanese as they were a strong army so he ordered the army to flee and left the untrained army. The Japanese quickly took over and tore the people and city to ruins. The Japanese saw the Chinese surrender as cowardice and an