The motivation behind the present article is to react to inquiries in regards to research methods in the field of criminal justice. The essay will address three principle questions. The first relates to the way of a true experiment and the design that would need to be utilized by researchers within a particular case study. The second relates to the ethical guidelines that must be met by experiments as a rule and the particular experiment under consideration inside of the given case study. The third relates to the part of the Institutional Review Board, and whether the researchers in the given case study could utilize an alternate research design in order to meet the pertinent moral criteria.
1. Nature of a True Experiment Two main components
…show more content…
Such situations have included the infamous Tuskegee syphilis experiment within the United States, as well as the medical experiments that were conducted by Nazi Germany. In these situations, human beings were essentially treated like proverbial guinea pigs: the subjects were not only asked for informed consent, they were not even treated as human beings possessing an inherent autonomy that must be respected by all other persons. There may be certain circumstances in which the doctrine of informed consent may get in the way of the development of scientific knowledge: for example, when the experimental data may be biased by the subjects' knowledge of the nature of the experiment. However, the standard consensus today is that this is an acceptable price to pay in order to ensure the preservation of basic moral …show more content…
The essay has also applied these issues within the context of a specific case study involving researchers who would like to work with recently released criminal offenders. These researchers may need to abandon the project of a true experiment, but they would be able to do valuable work
I feel that this case was somewhat representative of what was discussed in the textbook. The forensics aspects of this case were generally different from the impression of forensics I received from reading the textbook. Despite this fact, I feel that the investigative techniques of this case were similar to what was discussed in the textbook, as well as what has been discussed during lecture.
7. In an exploratory study such as this, one problem is defining what the "data" are -- the information we should collect. Also, what should have been done to minimize the effects of experimenter bias on the outcome of the study? What were the dangers of the principal investigator assuming the role of prison superintendent?
In todays society, the common consensus about human experimentation is that it is unethical, however, people in the past believed it was necessary to advance scientific discoveries. The Tuskegee syphilis study is a prime example of how scientists in the past disregarded the ethics of human experimentation to enhance scientific research. The study was an experiment where four- hundred to six-hundred uneducated African American men were tricked into being tested. Most of the patients were injected with the disease and left without treatment to discover its effects, while the others were safe being used as controls. This experiment lasted for Forty years and was probably the biggest example of unethical human experimentation in America. Fortunatley, the contrivertial actions taken in the experiment lead future generations to create the law of informed consent where the patient understands what will happen during their treatment. The inspiration for researching this topic was how in “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks”, by Rebecca Skloot, Henrietta was used for a scientific study without her consent. In relation to Henrietta, the men in the syphilis study were not aware of what was happening to them and were experimented on without their consent. Overall, the human experimentation in the Tuskegee syphilis study was unethical in many ways.
There are a multitude of constituents that could be modified to make these unprincipled studies ethical for subjects. The Tuskegee syphilis study was an unscrupulous experiment that illustrated the significance of morality in human experimentations. A noteworthy alteration that would be made is guaranteeing that every participant in experiments are given a full assessment of the dangers that can arise from the experiment. Consent was an element that was fundamentally nonexistent in the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, resulting in the study being expressively immoral. In addition, a momentous ethical and legal issue involved in the Tuskegee study were the counterfeited information given to the subjects and the community. David Smolin, the author of the “Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, Social Change, and the Future
The study conduct will assist in finding ways that will possibly allow criminal justice agencies and elective officials look closer at the issues that are affecting our criminal justice system within the United States. As we have witnessed, studies have been conducted on the cost of incarcerating offenders, the overcrowded prisons, and evidence programs that can aide with the problem at hand. We need those in higher positions to really take a deep look into the issue that is affecting our country and come to terms with the fact that there needs to be another way to ensure that the safety and security of the citizens are protected and that we find other ways to sentence those who are only a threat to
In today's class, we watched a set of 4 videos. This class response contains aspects of what I enjoyed from each case study. In the first video, I enjoyed how the entire community worked together for conservation, and made several sacrifices which would have served individual interest, in order to pick outcomes that are beneficial for collective good. Here, the community works alongside experts, providing the best of both worlds. In the second case, from Maharashtra, I liked how the villagers decided to combat the drought by digging a well, maintained by themselves. They use their own people and children, to plant in the hills and develop the ecosystem. I also liked how there was a song about the drought, reinforcing my interest in folk music lyrics.
In chapter two, we study the research methods of different psychological experiments and studies. This includes “the ethical obligations of researchers toward” the participants in their research, which are enforced by institutional review boards at American research colleges and universities. In these studies, researchers are required to provide the following: (a) informed consent “of the purpose of the research, its expected duration, and any potential risks, discomfort, or adverse associated with it”; (b) protection for harm and discomfort; (c) knowledge of deception in a study and debriefing once the study has concluded. These obligations are required to protect research participants. However, these are not always followed in research.
Human subjects should be fully informed about experiments in which they may participate and give their consent before they enroll. This includes research procedure and goals, risks and expected benefits. The participants should be informed that they have the right to withdraw at any time but they also need to inform about the risk factors of that withdrawal. They should be informed about if the research results will be made public or it will be kept private.
Chapter 10 is called escape is a short little six page chapter, and starts with Katie talking about Mark and updates in the case. One interesting update was them finding out Mark had pursued other girls---and boys----- and he had even slept with some of them. He also had pornography of a young girl involved in intercourse in his home. She then goes on a rant about pornography and ends it with, "If your twenty-five or married and you really need it (pornography), theres's something wrong. And if you really need pictures of little kids, then you are definitely sick." Soon after this court actually started. Katie even listened to a tape recording of the arraignment. Katie said Mark sounded like he believed he was innocent. Mark would originally start by claiming that he was innocent, and during this time Katie began to start calling him Francis.
Being involved in my internship with the Allen County Coroner’s Office has really opened my eyes to the variety of career choices that are available in the criminal justice system. The location of our building and the nature of our work makes it easy for me to interact with other departments. For example, I have gotten to see how the fingerprint lab operates and what they do daily; I have seen the wide array of activities and duties that crime scene does for the city; and I have experienced what it would be like in a more medically based forensic occupation such as a pathologist.
Scientists are conducting a research project that involves providing violent inmates with experimental medication in efforts of reducing aggression and agitation. The inmates give their consent to participate in the experiment, but potentially harmful side effects are withheld from the inmates and prison staff. The side effects include increased aggression, delusions, and paranoia. Several inmates experience the side effects and cause harm to themselves and others. Regardless, the experiment continues with recurring incidents of inmates harming themselves and others. Researchers speak to participating inmates several days a week, with researchers documenting information on how the experimental drug is affecting the inmates.
Participant observation has been a favorite tool used to study many types of behavioral patterns. When talking of the participant observation we have to refer to the variety of different methods that researchers use in their data collection. According to this unit the demise of the funded “golden age of criminal justice research” (Hagan, 2010), researchers mat return the qualitative methods and people oriented in the example used in this unit Chicago School style research. An example of the qualitative strategy approach would be police investigators, who gather information from offenders by interviewing them and then using the best way to solve the problem at hand. One disadvantage to this method of collecting data would be that this way is
An example of such unethical human experimentation is The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. This happened in Alabama and was performed by the U.S government in 1932. The men that were in the trial were given free health care, meals and burial insurance. 399 men had syphilis beforehand and 201 did not. Funding was cut for the experiments but they still continued to study these men even though the antibiotic penicillin had come out in 1947. They told the men that they had something called “bad blood” and they refused to tell the men that they had syphilis. This trial was continued until 1972 when the
Likewise, it is common for prisoners to have their contribution as research focuses bought by small resources, however in the prison environment important rewords such as food, or improved sleeping circumstances. And even in certain cases considerable rewards such as better healthcare, or large spending. Moreover, they might not obtain effective conduct for harms that consequence from the investigation study. Thus, I argue that investigation studies should be constrained from prison surroundings. Though, despite the threats, research studies can likewise grant much rewords to
I was formally employed by the Department of Homeland security, Transportation Security Administration from _____to _____. During the time, I’ve been employed with the agency, I’ve been respected by my peers as well as my superiors and have not received any disciplinary action. On ________ at approximately _____am I was driving down _____ and was pulled over by NYPD. I complied with the police officer’s instructions, exited the vehicle, and was given a field sobriety test. Upon failing to successfully complete the test, I was placed under arrest and charged with Driving While Under the Influence. I was taken into custody by NYPD and released on _____.