Nature Vs. Nurture Affect The Development Of Children

Nature alludes to the majority of the qualities and inherited elements that impact who we are from our physical appearance to our identity attributes. Nurture alludes to all the natural variables that effect who we are, including our initial adolescence encounters, how we were raised, our social connections, and our encompassing society. There are still arguments as to which in fact influences us. While we are being affected by both we are more impacted by nurture. Nature and nurture are big parts of our lives, we cannot have one with the other they shape who we are, however nurture is a bigger influence.

Examples of nature verses nurture can be exhibited in many ways through many subjects. The example I have chosen to use involves a dog as the subject. Nature influences the physical things of a dog such as the color of its coat, or eyes, these things are determined by nature through biology. However, a dog’s behavior is impacted and conditioned by nurture through its environment. For example, with a dog, nature determines the color and thickness of its coat; while environment determines its behavior such as when it hassles. Although hassling is a good example of how the environment and nurture impact a dog’s behavior it can also explain while some believe that things are a combination of nature and nurture. Nature allows the dog to know how to hassle, however the environment surrounding the dog causes the dog

Nature versus nurture is a psychology term related to whether heredity or the environment most impacts human psychological development. Nature is what you already know and what is instinct. It also is what kicks in when you’re in trouble. Nurture is what you learn and what you observe by watching people. Nurture is what parents do when their kids are hurt or need them.

This is an ongoing debate and understandably so. I do believe that both nature and nurture play apart in development. Nature in my opinion I 'd suggest that one of the reasons that people believe in the nurture effect is that

My view on nature vs Nurture is, nature is based on what others think of you and nature is what your inner circle thinks of you. That’s like someone trying to play with your intelligence, when the outside think they know about you but don’t know what’s really going on. Nature comes along from your inner circle people that knows a lot more about you probably notice more about yourself than you do. That’s like asking yourself where did my eye color come from did I get it from my mother or my father. But your physical features can be just as identical to either parent. When you think about you personality you get to wondering where that came from. Your personality doesn’t have to always come from you father or mother, it can come from the people

One of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology is the Nature vs Nurture debate. This said debate is important in whether the child’s development is based only in genetics or environmental impacts. The definition of nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are. Throughout the child’s development, it is seen that the genetic influence over abstract traits of the child may exist; but, the environmental factors are the real origins of our behavior. This shows that the use of conditioning in the aspects of physical, social, and moral is crucial to the child’s development as it is the product of maturation. In the physical aspect, it shows that the deprivation of the mother while inside her womb will develop

Our first question, how are nature and nurture identified? Nature is seen as the genes, inheritances, and biology that are passed on to you through your parents (www.goodtherapy.org). This means, believers on the nature side see your biological parents pass onto you defines your personality, health and behavior later on in life. This could be credited by your genetic makeup. Nurture is seen as the influence of external factors, that are adopted at birth, which means that your life is pressured by the world around you (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov),(www.simplyphyscology.org). Many people believe that natural influences can cause a person to return back to the ways of the cavemen and

In thinking about the nature versus nurture debate, I think that nature and nurture both have the strongest impact on development, because nature deals with genetics and nurture is the way you were raised. From watching the video the twins separated by birth is a good example of nature because in the video it the twins were editors of their high school paper and they both went to film school. This shows nature because the twins were separated at birth and they end doing similar things, the twins did not grow up with each other so it was not like they would know what they both are going to do. But the reason why I believe that nature has the strongest impact on development because genes are usually something that makes up some of are characteristics

Scientist and Psychologist have long debated which of the two, nature or nurture, plays a bigger role in human development. My opinion is that neither is more influential than the other. Rather, there is evidence that states both are equally important in forming who we are as a person.

Nature versus nurture is a psychology term related to whether heredity or the environment most impacts human psychological development (Huffman, 2012). Providing Dr. Money’s theory was much more difficult than people might realize. In many cases he was prove wrong with his theory in most children.

Nature versus Nurture is a wide spread topic that many psychologist study. Nurture is the environment, while Nature is genetics.

Some people believe that nature and nurture are the same thing, but in fact they are actually completely different. While the behaviors that result from both may be similar, the reason and explanation behind these influences comes from a very different place. Nature versus nurture is an ongoing debate among individuals that study psychology. There are behaviors that are given through genetics and “nature” that make us unique, while nurturing from our environmental elements can make a difference in the quality of our performance.

Nature vs. Nurture has been a big debate whether which one matters most when determining the traits of an individual. So which has the greater effect on one's personality? Nature is thought of what is being influenced by genetic inheritance and other biological factors while nurture is the influence of external factors after conception. It is a debate that one is more important than the other but both influences make a humans behavior.

A developing child comes across environmental factors and also what they are surrounded by. Nature versus nurture which nature has a larger effect on a child’s development. An example of this would be the experiment done on Victor, his new environment could not overcome his basic imperfections proving that nature has a bigger impact rather than nurture by other people in society trying to assimilate Victor into their customs. Biological inheritance can also be a factor for development but the environment realizes those potentials.

I believe this because the nature of you has to deal with what was passed down from generation to generation that affects your genes and because the nurture of you has to deal with what type of environment that your grew up in, what type of environment that you live in and what kinds of people that you hang out with. I would have to say that both nature and nurture affects the aspects of me. I believe that nature influenced the aspects of my development more because I don’t really hang out with anybody and I love to study and read just like my aunt and grandmother. In your opinion, what influences how our personal development: nature or nurture, or perhaps a bit of