One of the main aspects of this chapter that really hit home for me was the concept of nurturing a child. I have always been in the camp of nurture, or the lack thereof, being the source of why children suffer from emotional and developmental issues. In the nature vs. nurture debate, my hand was always raised high on the side of nurture. However, this chapter has shed some light in the depth of that train of thought. It is true that parental bonds and attachment play an enormous roll in early childhood development, but they can be displayed in a variety of ways. For instance, mom is not the sole nurturer in the home, as previously thought. The importance of father roles as well as two-parent homes has shown to be just as important as having
Throughout history, studies have shown that who you become later in life is determined at birth, that one’s genes solely influence who they grow up to be. To some extend this may be true however, new research concluded that the environment and experiences someone experiences as a child can be just as influential as genetic makeup. These studies have led to the Nature verses Nurture debate, with the nature side being one’s heredities and the nurture side, childhood experiences and relationships. This controversy has largely impacted the criminal world, as law enforcement tries to understand why some people commit horrendous acts. Nature vs. Nurture specifically comes into play when trying to understand the psychology of a serial killer, as
The debate between nature versus nurture keeps coming out these years whenever people talk of children’s developmental issues. In the topic of bullying, there are both nature and nurture reasons to make a child acts aggressively. According to Klahr, Klump and Burt (2014), children’s antisocial behaviors are strongly affected by the environmental factors. These factors included negative parenting styles and parent-child relationships. In this way, if a child sees his or her parents act aggressively toward others, so it is predictable that the child is likely to bully his or her peers to some extent.
Much research has been done on the influence of a mother on a child’s well-being and development (Pougnet, Serbin, Stack, & Schwartzman, 2011). However, research has shown that an engaged and loving father can contribute greatly to a child’s cognitive, social, and psychological development (Bronte-Tinkew, Carrano, Horowitz, & Kinukawa, 2008; Duursma, Pan, & Raikes, 2008; Pancsofar & Vernon-Feagans, 2010; Wilson & Prior, 2010).
There are many different ways that behavior can be explained, especially on the terms of nature vs. nurture. Aggression is a behavior that has been extensively analyzed in a complex manner and the causes of it can be explained many different ways. Aggression can be defined as hostile or destructive behavior that can cause injury or destructive outlook especially when caused by frustration. Nature can be defined as aspects of behavior that have been inherited or are genetic, while nurture is all aspects that are influenced by environmental characteristics and experience. Many factors, both biological and environmental, influence and promote aggressive behaviors, such as hormones and neurotransmitters, genetics, family life, past experiences, and hobbies.
When we learn something new, we begin to forget rapidly before what we retain levels off. Reasons for why this may be happening is because we never encoded the memory, decaying of stored memory, or because the physical memory trace is gradually fading (Myers & DeWall, 2016, p.303).
During the ages of early childhood, particularly from birth till elementary school, a child requires the utmost care and attention possible. Quite literally, a baby is born in the world as a seed and needs nothing more than unconditional nurturing in order to grow and develop at a steady pace. In the case of psychiatrist Bruce Perry’s “The Coldest Heart”, Leon is a teenager who comes from a tight-knit, affectionate family yet unlike his older brother Frank, Leon was never exposed to such care and attention. Instead, he spent his childhood in a state of neglect and darkness- an apparent yet uncalled for trigger to his juvenile, criminal behavior that shaped him to become what Dr. Perry considers being a “classic sociopath” (Perry, 114).
In 1963 serial killer hunted and murdered 27 people , dismembered the bodies and dumped them all over the state of California. At his trial his defense lawyer said his defense was that he was born this way. Nature vs Nurture is a debate that has been around for years. It is an argument on whether people’s personalities and actions are the way they are because they were born that way or that’s how they were raised. So this means people are either a product of their environment. Or their traits were passed down genetically. Nature vs Nurture is a direct correlation with child development.
Middle Childhood is the name given for the age division from 6 to 11 years of a child’s life. They are also known as the “school years.” During this time a child’s health, education, and emotional well being are all undergoing changes. Though not as drastic as the changes they will soon face in adolescence, they are steady, and the impact that nature and nurture will have on these aspects reach far and wide across the many developments they face in their lives.
The nature vs. nurture debate has been a long and bloody battle for the longest time for psychologists. Some believe that we are the products of our environment, meaning that we become who we are as a result of our upbringing, social influences, and schooling among other factors. On the other hand, the naturists believe that outside influences have nothing to do with how we turn out; it all depends on our genes. One psychologist, however, has made the attempt to bridge these two sides together. Robert Plomin’s work in genetics and psychology has helped people understand the roles the environment and genetics play in areas such as education, behavior, and development.
of “self and mind [being] social products” Henslin, J.M. (2013). I started to and now
The Developing Child tells the viewers a brief history of the Nature vs. Nurture debate. Jean-Jacques Rousseau stressed the nature side of our personalities, believing it is nature alone that makes us how we are. English physiologist, John Locke believed children start off as blank slates and that they are completely shaped by their environment and thus held to the nurture side of the debate. This video has much newer ideas and experiments than those of Rousseau’s and Locke’s and because of that their thesis is “while biological factors provide the capabilities, environmental factors see if they are reached”. Babies know and think much more than was previously thought. Babies can turn their eyes and heads immediately recognize mother’s voice,
From the time of conception to the time of death, we are constantly developing and changing. Although some of the changes are as a result of personal adoptions and incidences, most changes experienced are as a result of our shared biological and mental heritage as humans and are shared by all individuals in the globe. A lot of studies have been dedicated to the study of human growth and development. In the book, Lifespan development, various concepts have been discussed in the first nine chapters. These include, the theories in the study of human development, the question of whether nature and nurture affect the development of a child, conception, pre-birth and birth, infancy, early childhood and middle childhood.
One of the oldest human development debate in psychology is nature vs. nurture. Some scientists believe that people are born with personality qualities that come from instinct, without the need to learn the trait (Rathus, 56). They are other scientists that believe ones personality is effected by his/her surroundings (Rathus, 56)
The overall focus of Chapter 2 is the effect of the relationship between nature and nurture, on a child’s development. The three main important ideas of this chapter to me, a mother of young children, are the early perspectives that one factor, either nature or nurture has on development, the importance of context in a child’s development and finally the interaction among nature and nurture and its effects on development.
Nature Vs Nurture; Nature is influenced by genetic inheritance 50% from their mother and 50% from their father or can stem from a family relation, from health issues to how one looks (ie) hair or eye color etc, it can also be hormonal influences and brain activity being responsible for development and behavior. Nature/Nurture is one of the most controversial debates in psychology. Nurture refers to the behaviours we learn through the socialisation process, this means the things we do are a result of what we have learned through interactions with the environment or experiences such as socio-economic factors. Behaviors can also come from expectations and guidelines found within our culture or society.