preview

Negative Externalities Of Animal Agriculture

Decent Essays

Thoughts on the Negative Externalities of Animal Agriculture
A few years ago, I read a Cornell study that changed my thoughts on what it meant to be environmentally responsible. To my dismay, I soon realized that the Cornell study was just one among many other studies which bear out the incontrovertible facts about animal agriculture and yet, even organizations like the Sierra Club seemed to tiptoe around the truth. Clearly, it is not for a lack of evidence that environmental groups fail to be forthright with the public but rather it is to protect their own bottom line and perhaps their viability that they pander to the middle and ignore the viability of the planet. Popular environmental groups expressly avoid the obvious answer to the problem of depleted resources because the solution is too unpleasant for their mainstream donors, Hence, the problem of animal agriculture simply waits on us like the sinkhole of humanity. The spokespersons for the environment attempt to be diplomatic as we circle around the drain. Nonetheless, here are a few of the facts I discovered: 1) The U.S. could feed 800 million people a year with grain that livestock eat. 2) Animal protein production requires more than eight times as much fossil-fuel energy than the production of plant protein 3) Animal agriculture is a leading consumer of water resources in the United States. 4) Livestock is directly or indirectly responsible for much of the …show more content…

In other words, I’m one of the dreaded “vegans” who harps on harsh realities when everyone would rather discuss celebrity gossip. Although I’m vegan for the animals, I also believe veganism is the moral baseline for anyone who professes to care about the environment. Thus, I don’t support the goals of environmental groups who talk about improving the practice of animal agriculture just as I don’t support those who talk about improving the fossil fuel industry. There are no shortcuts to a sustainable

Get Access