New Zealand Cultural And Ethical Consideration Essay

The code of ethics is very important through-out all aspects of psychology. Without ethical guidelines psychology would be completely different from what we know it to be. These guidelines protect the rights of all participants, so without guidelines participants would have no rights or protection during research. The researcher would be free to do as they please, as they don’t have any ethical guidelines to consider.

Before determining the factors of the research ethics involved, researchers would need to answer several critical questions, for example -what is the purpose of the research? Does the research answer new questions, or older ones that require re-testing or rethinking? Is the research worth undertaking? Will a new study produce new knowledge? Among many other questions. The responses to these questions would help to develop early plans and design of the research ‘Alderson (2014)’. Once this though process is done, then the researchers can determine the ethical factors based on responses made as a reply to several questions they would need to ask themselves under each concerning factor. In the case of harm and benefit, there are several key

Farrell further discusses the current struggle between different ethical camps within research fields. The ethics theories discussed are utilitarian, rights, virtues, and principles, and the benefits and drawbacks of each are mentioned briefly. For example, the theory of principles argue that ethical guidelines for human subjects research cannot rely on guidelines alone, but must further involve a desire to act ethically at

Researcher will properly fill University Research Ethics Committee form and submit through the supervisor. This study intends to recruit participants and conduct interview at National Health Service, therefore will obtain consent from the local Research Ethic Service organized by the National Research Ethics Service (NRES). Information sheet will be made available for participants, containing details about the research nature; goal and method, which form the basis for the participant consents (Appendix 1). Resolve problems of participants’ vulnerable age group by getting parents and participants informed consent (Appendix 3 &

In psychology ethics is a system of moral principles which should be followed whilst conducting the research. Participants should be aware of the aim and procedure of a study they have agreed to participate in, their privacy and confidentiality should be protected at all cost. Participators must sign an informed consent paper to show that they

When conducting any type of psychological research, the American Psychological Association (APA) Ethics codes comes into effect. Every researcher or scientist is obligated to follow the standards set in the ethics codes. There are many ethical standards that need to be upheld when dealing with research. Researchers must see if the research or study meets the ethical standards. There are many ways of conducting research and gathering data. Some ways are considered ethical and appropriate ways to gather data while other ways are deemed unethical. Deception and misrepresenting oneself in order to obtain data is a controversial issue on

& Mantzorou, M., (2011). What are the Major Ethical Issues in Conducting Research? Is there a Conflict between the Research Ethics and the Nature of Nursing? Health Science Journal, 5 (1), pp. 3 - 14. Available at: http://www.hsj.gr/medicine/what-are-the-major-ethical-issues-in-conducting-research-is-there-a-conflict-between-the-research-ethics-and-the-nature-of-nursing.pdf Accessed 09/09/2017

The researchers failed to uphold the ethical principles of respect for persons and beneficence. Respect for persons, as defined by Geri LoBiondo-Wood and Judith Haber, means that people have the right to remain anonymous as well as the right to choose if they want to be a part of the research study (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2014, p. 256). It

The first universal guideline outlined by the AAA is, “avoiding harm or wrong,” this is typically a universal concept followed by most cultures. Secondly, “Researchers must obtain the informed consent of affected parties,” regardless of the branch of study the concept of informed consent is universal in all human research,

This is also outlined in the Respect for People’s Rights and Dignity, which is part of the Ethics Code. Integrity and Justice are as well mentioned, however, most people in research fields are aware of these, it’s the participation of real human beings that alters the research and ethics for psychologists. Confidentiality is also important to many people who participate in these studies, they may be private in nature and not something they want to be recognized publically for. In the end, all will be revealed to them during a debriefing of the study to the participant.

All reports and findings should be reported with caution as it relates to children in the study. Informing parents any negative information about their child is a sensitive subject and should be approached with caution. The final ethical principles fifteen and sixteen discuss personal and scientific misconduct. These are two of the most important ethical principles as it relates to falsifying or adding to data in the study may result in criminal violation.

The Belmont Report, published in 1979 by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects in Biomedical and Behavioral Research is required reading for all researchers. This document provides the ethical underpinnings of most of the U.S. Federal regulations governing human research. The document sets out the difference between the practice of medicine and research, ethical principles including the principles of respect for individuals, beneficence and justice, and more specific the application of these principles to actual research. For example, the document discusses informed consent, the assessment of risks and benefits and the design of research, and the selection of subjects.

In this paper, I will discuss how to ensure that all aspects of my doctoral research, from literature review, conducting research, writing the dissertation manuscript and so on, will be done in careful and integrity manner in such a way that it will meet the ethical standards of scientific research. This will ensure that my research will be accepted, published, and contribute to the body of knowledge. Also, to achieve this, I, will try to follow and justify all the steps needed in order to ensure that the ethical integrity of my dissertation project is met. More so, in effort to accomplish these, I will clearly outline ethical principles and state how to apply them to research work. I will also, further elucidate how I will apply published ethical guidelines and concepts to my research project. Some specific areas I will address include Plagiarism, Risk assessment, Informed consent, Privacy and confidentiality, Data handling and reporting, Mistakes and negligence, Working with a Mentor, Northcentral University requirements for IRB approval. I will conclude this paper by expressing my thought on the following statement, “Ethical scientific researchers have a commitment to all who are touched by their research—participants who share their lives and time, mentors and advisors, reviewers, future readers, and supporters and cheerleaders on the journey—to take care and do their work well”.

The vast majority of ethical dilemmas regarding research and the involvement of human participants is associated with concerns that are decidedly monetary in nature. Of course, the most fundamental concerns for any such research would be to protect the health and the welfare of those human participants (Callahan 1998). This statement becomes particularly true when such a population group pooled for research includes specialty subjects such as elderly people, pregnant women, and subsets that may be considered especially vulnerable. Although this consideration is widely viewed as something of a foregone conclusion concerning the subject of ethical dilemmas in research, it is actually an integral component of many of the pecuniary considerations regarding the ethics of human research. One of the principle questions of ethics in research is whether or not the information gained from human participants can be considered valid, when such participants are being paid or compensated in some way that could, conceivably, affect the results of whatever research is performed. Another ethical concern is raised by the efficacy and veracity of Institutional Review Boards who approve or validate the techniques of human research. Situations may very well arise in which members of those review boards have conflicts of interests with their professional duties as board members and the results of certain types of research.

The three basic ethical principles generally accepted principles in the U.S. cultural tradition include the principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. The principles of respect for persons ensure that human subjects treated as autonomous agents and persons with diminished autonomy are provided protection (CDC, n.a.). The protection relates to when human subjects may lack coherence under certain medications, sickness, or physical conditions in which the researcher acts on good faith to choose considerable judgments on the human subjects’ behalf. Human subjects obtain the right to be fully informed of the activities he or she must participate prior to beginning the experimentations.