Notation Template:
Three sections on a single A4 page:
1.
* Understanding a play’s directorial potential and existing intent relies on understanding from where within each definable unit and scene the tension arises, which can then be utilised to direct the space in which the play is performed and the delivery of lines by the actors. All to ensure accuracy and quality within the performance. * The play’s text relies on a major dramatic question that overarches the story and strings the dramatic tension and resolution together through the work as well as a goal for the protagonist, which acts alongside the MDQ to push the plot forward, and towards the goal of resolution.
* A director’s understanding of the play must exceed that of the
…show more content…
It shows that in this understanding of how a story is constructed, each individual unit of action and dialogue within a scene adds certain elements to the story itself and allows mini-deconstructions of character within them. All of this is well and good, however the form that this information was presented in, seemed to limit the structure of story to a rudimentary exhibit of modernist and prior storytelling. This didn’t add to nor modify my view of directing by the text itself, but it did make me think of how (within the worlds of contemporary theatre and post-structuralism) the opportunity to break down a text into these units could be used to create something new, but true to the original creator’s intended story.
That being said, the idea of equilibrium disruption within the story of all kinds of theatre is a universal truth, that, even when there is no truly defined storyline to a piece, must exist to ensure that a work contains the tension required of all works. As well as all other elements of storytelling, be they visible or otherwise hidden in the sub textual base of a performance.
b) How could you apply the key messages of this
The overall dramatic meaning of this play has been successfully shown by the elements of drama. The
The theme of Orloff’s play focuses on examining these expectations of good playwriting with a surprise lesson being discovered in the end. The Teacher, who is supposedly showing how the scene should play out between the Jumper and Good Samaritan, learns a valuable lesson himself on the craft of writing a good play. The lesson being that in theater, just as in real life, nothing is set in stone and anything is possible.
His methodical and systematic approach helps draw out the tension and mystery of the play
Please Note: Diction, detail, point of view, organization and syntax are all devices that the author uses to make the tone of the story evident to the reader. Your commentary should
"In a play the whole stream of individual minor objectives, all the imaginative thoughts, feelings and actions of an actor, should converge to carry out the super objective of the plot"
To begin with, the most striking feature of this work is that it is a story
The author writes the story in a very interesting way. The way that there are only a few descriptions scattered about and that it focuses on dialogue is what allows us to figure out what the characters are speaking about and to find the intentions behind their words. The subject of this short narrative stands out boldly. Though it was written in
11. Point out some moments in the play when the playwright conveys much to the audience without dialogue
To begin with, in this play the author unfolds family conflicts that involve its characters into a series of events that affected their lives and pushed them to unexpected ways.
Throughout the play there are many themes leading up to and causing the chief event.
Made to function within two structural units, the characters acquire one identity in the outer play – their real identities – and another in the inner play. However, the distinction between the identities, and, even, between the plays,
To Lee Lewis, the most important aspect of theatre is the message the writers are trying to put across to the audience. In order for that message to be heard, there can’t be any sense of the director present, nor the actors behind the characters, as she quotes “If the directors hand is to visible in a work then that’s a failure to me” (AustralianPlays.org 2014). This message from the writers is so powerful because it conveys present issues and thoughts, which is why she is so interested in directing ‘new work’. “You can’t take the writing of someone else and use it as your own materiel” she quotes. This is what she calls ‘re-authoring’ when an artist like Barrie Kosky or Benedict Andrews takes a work such as Barrie Kosky’s remake of Oedipus
The essay investigates how a director should communicate and work with actors during rehearsal and on set to produce engaging performances. The essay investigates different acting styles, the rehearsal process, directing on set and communication between actors and director. The essay assumes the actor has formal training and basic experience. The essay then proves effective communication achievable through the “actor’s vocabulary” is key not to over-direct and building trust with the actor.
When I first began directing, to me, the play was the thing. My mind was focused on the goings on of the stage with limited awareness beyond its borders. It seemed that dealing with the audience was somebody else’s job. If I directed a great play, I thought, people would come and like it. Job done. “Why this play now?” was a philosophical, intellectual question—but not something I really confronted in an educational setting.
with the power of the audience in the play as well as the story seems