preview

Old Fort Erie Case Study

Better Essays

Part A: Introduction and Statement of Objectives
Wilfrid Laurier University has conducted an archaeological field school at Old Fort Erie in 2012, 2013, and 2015. The work has primarily been conducted by undergraduate students supervised by Teaching Assistants and Dr. John Triggs. This paper will be focused on the 2015 season, specifically nnit M, excavated by Joshua Graf. The artifacts recovered from the Unit have been catalogued and entered into an excel worksheet; pivot tables have also been created. These artifacts will be analyzed and statements will be made about the assemblage and its relation to the wider site.
Site History

Old Fort Erie was initially constructed in 1764, serving as a depot for the storage and transfer of goods …show more content…

Though the fort was under British command at the start of the war, it would not be that way for long. On July 3rd, 1814, over 5000-well trained troops crossed the Niagara River into Canada and took control of the fort (Owen 1986). Since Fort Erie was occupied by only a few British regiments, and militia companies from Lincoln and Norfolk counties there little resistance. (Owen 1986). Old Fort Erie served as the push off point for the American campaign North along the Niagara River. After several bloody battles, a wounded American army had to eventually retreat back to Fort Erie to regroup and strengthen their army (Owen 1986). It was during this time the British saw their opportunity and fortified positions to the north of the fort, preparing for a lengthy siege to finally push the Americans out. After a two-week long artillery bombardment of the fort, nearly 2,500 British soldiers carried out a three-pronged attack (Owen 1986). The attack proved to be a defeat for the British, who lost over 1,000 men when a bastion containing ammunition exploded (Owen …show more content…

The areas of investigation were focused to the west of Douglass battery, chosen based on an 1804 watercolour painting by Edward Walsh (see figure 1). In the painting, three buildings are observed in the background, which prompted the survey of the suspected area. A grid was set up in the area with flags being placed at an interval of five meters. These intervals were test pitted down to the subsoil and the contents screened through mesh. The test pits, which revealed building material, were used to co-ordinate three different areas that would be excavated. Units were placed within each of these three spaces, laid in a way to maximize the area that would be covered. Areas one and three were supervised by teaching assistants Katie Anderson and Duncan Williams, while area two was under the supervision of Dr. John Trigs. All soil that was removed was screened through wire mesh and artifacts were placed in plastics bags with the provenience labeled on the front. The season lasted six weeks, beginning from May 11th, to June 5th 2015. At the end of the season, all units were backfilled with soil, with plastics sheets being placed in specific units to protect features.
Artifact Analysis

The following section contains an analysis of the artifacts recovered from unit M. All artifacts catalogued by both myself and my partner, Laura Inthof, were complied into a single spreadsheet. Various pivot tables

Get Access