preview

Overpopulation : State Of Debate

Good Essays

Overpopulation
State of debate Should governments fine people who have too many biological children in order to reduce environmental damage due to overpopulation?
Introduction
If someone told your parent they were being fined by the government because you had an abundance of sisters and brothers, how would you feel? On the other side of things, what if you found out your brothers and sisters contributed to environment issues? Statistics draw to the fact that the world is becoming overpopulated and that our actions today affect the future generations. Some agree due to statistics and increasing issues with the world population growing. Some argue that it affects their autonomy and overall happiness. Some also would agree that it comes …show more content…

In addition to that, over time we will be adding in several billions of citizens. Each one of those people produce emissions. If that continues, we are not successfully setting up future generations for success. There are many problems that having many children can affect the environment and the future of mankind. Adding to that challenge, the world is expected to add several billion people in the next few decades, each one producing more emissions. "The situation is bleak, it 's just dark," he says. "Population engineering, maybe it 's an extreme move. But it gives us a chance” (Ludden, 1). The question is, how could we as a whole persuade billions of people around the world to do this? This would require educating women and families on fertility and the outcomes it produces to the environment. Contraception would need to be more accessible and other agencies and groups would need to expand.
Duty to conserve resources
As a whole, we all have a duty to ensure future generations happiness. “We have a duty to conserve resources. At current rates, we will use up the known reserves of fossil fuels and uranium within two hundred years. Wasting theses resources, especially when known technology can increase efficiency, so that we can conserve without significant sacrifice of convenience, denies people of the future a fair opportunity to attain a lifestyle commensurate with our own” (Desjardins, 85). If people were to be

Get Access