Nikolai Danilevskii, Russian naturalist and proponent of pan-Slavism, theorized that the Germanic-Roman and Slavic peoples were of distinct historical-cultural types and, by nature, bound to clash. Although readers of his work Russia and Europe (1869) were highly polarized in their opinions of his arguments, Danilevskii’s ideas seem precursory to World War I, and how differences in political, religious, and scientific worldviews between Germany and Russia played into its unfolding.
In Europe, the 19th century was one of increased nationalism for both the new and established. Nationalism—the belief that peoples who share a common language and culture ought to be unified as one independent nation—drove the unification of the Germanic states and the development of Slavophilism in Russia. German nationalist sentiment, at its height in the
…show more content…
Religiously, this meant a resurgence of Eastern Orthodoxy. During the Church reform of the late 17th to early 18th centuries, Peter the Great had put the Eastern Orthodox Church under governmental control, essentially making it politically powerless. Russian nationalism of the 19th century, manifest in the pan-Slavic movement, brought religious ideology to the forefront, as the empire became the self-ordained protector of Orthodox Christians in the increasingly anti-clerical Western Europe. And in many ways, the Russian worldview was a rejection of Western Europe’s. For example, in arguing against the westernization of Russia, Danilevskii rejected Darwinism, proposing that evolution was not random but rather, followed the will of God the Creator. Darwinism, a prominent feature of Western European thought, was likewise rejected by most of conservative
Q.1 Nationalism- Very possible that nationalism amongst the European states along with the Russian Empire all had a strong view to how Europe should look, and in doing so sparked more fuel into the fire that caused World War I. Old schoolmasters would say “It is sweet and fitting to die for one’s country” states were now being viewed as a person rather than an entity, the only thought process people had in the late nineteenth century and previous years was in order to grow a nation one must take it from another.
Nationalism can be traced to the nineteenth century, European peoples came to identify strongly with communities they called nations. Members of a nation considered themselves a distinctive people that spoke a common language, observed common customs, inherited common cultural conditions, held common values, and shared common
Nationalism: is a strong feeling of pride in one’s country and believing that one’s country is better than other country and this aggressive nationalism in the early 1900’s was a source of tension in Europe, which fueled the war. Nationalism was very strong in France and Germany; it unified the Germans, as they were proud of their growing military and industrial strength. While, France wanted to regain its position as a leading European power. Similarly, Russia had encouraged a form of nationalism in Eastern Europe called Pan Slavism. It drew all Slavic people and Russia was the largest Slavic country ready to defend small Serbia. Multinational Austria Hungary opposed Slavic national movements. After Napoleon’s exile to Elba congress of Vienna was held and it tried to solve the problem in Europe. Delegates of Britain, Austria, Russia, and Prussia agreed upon a new Europe whereas Germany and Italy were left as divided states. So there
The start of the 20th century was marked by a strong sense of nationalism in many European powers. This shared patriotism, was evoked by many governments to gain support about becoming a part in World War I. Many people bought into this sense of belonging and sought to fight for
Nationalism shaped the development of European countries from the way some European countries disagreed with the way they were being ruled. In document 7 it says, “So long as we live. What foreign force has seized, we’ll reclaim with sabre.” Poland decided that they didn’t like the way they were being treated and would gain back their countries independence as many times as needed. Hungary realized that they wanted independence when the man who dared call himself king did something that made the people of Hungary angry. “. . . he erases the Hungarian nation from the list of independent nations of Europe . . .” (Doc 3). In Russia workers wanted better rights and reformed, this event was called Bloody Sunday. Bloody Sunday lead to even greater problems, “Bloody Sunday leads to Revolution in 1905.” (Doc 5).
Steven G. Marks, asserts that Russia significantly influenced the modern world with its innovations on: politics, culture, society, fashion, economics, and arts, particularly between 1880 and 1980 in How Russia Shaped the Modern World. Normally Russia is left out of the world history rhetoric, but doing so is incorrect as its conflicting ideals with Western values has two notable significances: the animosity toward Russia by Western society created a series of reactions that impacted the world, and the hostility of others towards the West meant they were rather welcoming to Russian ideas. He begins with the theory of anarchism developing in Russia, from where it would spread to the world. Next he focuses on critical figures in Russian history
Nationalism and liberalism were two popular political philosophies of the late 19th century. Nationalism is the aspiration of a people with a common language, culture and traditions to be unified. Nationalism grew into a movement after 1815, influenced by literature, music, politics and economic developments between the northern Germany states. By 1848, nationalism was strong among Germans, but the course to unify German would prove to take time.
Nationalism is the idea that one’syour country is superior to better than all the other countries. Being an imperialist country with this idea, a personyou could theoretically take any land where they have the necessary resources to further advance an industrial revolution. By Europe being under the influence of:; imperialism, nationalism and thea Iindustrial Rrevolution, they went to countries where Europeans consider themselves more civilized, and exploited those places for their raw materials. This plays a major part in history because Europe went to Africa for rubber, and slaves, treating the people as less than human. “But what made imperialism so broadly popular in Europe, especially in the last quarter of the nineteenth century, was the growth of mass nationalism. By 1871, the unification of of Italy and Germany made Europe’s already competitive international relations even more so.” (882) This implies that because Europeans
Nationalism started with the revolution of France and England with the Enlightenment principle after the defeat of Napoleon. This created a ripple down effect on the people of Germany, Italy, and other eastern European countries to gains its independence who were groups of people unified by a common language. Both Germany and Italy wanted to embrace Nationalist ideals to strive for European power like England, France, Russia, Austrian Empire and the Ottoman Empire. But in order to gain European power, Germany and Italy had to build industrially and expand territorially. Germany expanded territorially by taking land from Denmark while Italy took land Austria.
During the nineteenth century, a significant gap started to emerge between the dominant Western powers an the rest of the world (Marks). The effects of this gap, built in large part on circumstance and chance can still be seen to this day. The long term impacts of western colonialism extend far beyond the boundaries of the newly industrialized societies, helping build the foundation for western peri-industrial imperialist culture. The causes for a nation’s transition into a more nationalistic identity are usually complex and nuanced, historically these shifts tend to correspond to reactions to periods of great pressure and struggle or periods of great economic triumph and innovation.
The French Revolution directly affected the nineteenth century through the creation of many ideologies, one important one being nationalism. Nationalism is a very controversial ideology because of the many diverse approaches towards its true definition. A broad definition of nationalism could be perceived as a strong devotion towards the culture and identity of a nation. As well as the idea that nations will benefit more from acting as an independent nation opposed to multiple states working together as a collective. Its emergence completely changed the political map of Europe and resulted in the birth of many new nations. There are many different views towards the true reason for the emergence of Nationalism in Europe. Many historians believe the emergence can be credited to the French Revolution and later the continuation of ideas under Napoleon Bonaparte. While others believe the Industrial Revolution held more importance for the widespread arrival of nationalism. It seems better to encompass both and argue that the emergence of nationalism in Europe was caused by the French Revolution, Napoleon Bonaparte’s rule, and the Industrial Revolution.
Nationalism became so popular because the middle-class was rising in numbers and they realised that they should take the crap of the government and would support their country and mold it into what they want as a people. It was appealing because it offered a way of getting more for yourself and others and breaking away from the grasp of tyranny. The goals of nationalism in Europe was to better society for the people and make the government based off what the people want and not a few higher up aristocrats. France excelled with the empowerment of Napoleon the 3rd due to his adding of male suffrage and better city infrastructure. The French only prospered more when he became the Emperor of France and got away from the church and became a more
Nationalism was a growing forces throughout all nations. But, it wasn't always unifying. It was especially strong in Austria-hungry, Serbia, Russia, Balkans, Germany, Europe it's self, and in the ottoman empire. All of these groups had dislikes and likes of each other. Serbia, for example, had a large Slavic population and wanted to gain all the slabs on the Balkan peninsula. Russia liked this too but Austria-hungry did not at all. Austria-Hungry thought that the
This article aims to give an overview of the rise of imperialism and nationalism in Germany and the other major powers involved in World War I. Nationalism reached a fevered pitch in Europe prior to the first World War. As a political tool, Nationalism was the belief that European technological, cultural, economic and military superiority was just cause for the subjugation of more backward cultures and economies. Because of nationalism & imperialism European nations began building up their armed forces. Each nation wanted its armed forces to be stronger than those of any potential enemy. By
Nationalism is defined as spirit or aspirations common to the whole of a nation; devotion and loyalty to one's own country; patriotism; excessive patriotism. In 1848, Europe experienced back to back revolutions in different countries led by rebels and nationalists who wanted constitutional and democratic governments to replace the monarchies that ruled. Although these revolutions were unsuccessful in achieving their goals of turning their country into a new,stronger nation, they did have significant impacts in Italy, France, Austria and Germany, where they influenced the course of future political change.