Pan Slavophilism Essay

Nationalist sentiment had reached levels of great intensity during the last decades of the 19th Century. A sense of cultural and technological superiority was pervasive among the Great Powers. All believed that their traditions, histories, cultural and technical achievements, and national destinies were superior to those of their opponents. Imperialist ambitions, international/diplomatic resentments, competition in an increasingly expanding industrial sphere, and a sense of military superiority, all informed the nationalist spirit of the age. The principle of nationalism was not new, but it had reached new heights of intensity in the nineteenth century, and this fervor generally carried over into the start of World War

Nationalism: is a strong feeling of pride in one’s country and believing that one’s country is better than other country and this aggressive nationalism in the early 1900’s was a source of tension in Europe, which fueled the war. Nationalism was very strong in France and Germany; it unified the Germans, as they were proud of their growing military and industrial strength. While, France wanted to regain its position as a leading European power. Similarly, Russia had encouraged a form of nationalism in Eastern Europe called Pan Slavism. It drew all Slavic people and Russia was the largest Slavic country ready to defend small Serbia. Multinational Austria Hungary opposed Slavic national movements. After Napoleon’s exile to Elba congress of Vienna was held and it tried to solve the problem in Europe. Delegates of Britain, Austria, Russia, and Prussia agreed upon a new Europe whereas Germany and Italy were left as divided states. So there

The start of the 20th century was marked by a strong sense of nationalism in many European powers. This shared patriotism, was evoked by many governments to gain support about becoming a part in World War I. Many people bought into this sense of belonging and sought to fight for

An event in Russia lead Poland to want to be an independent nation. “We shall be poles. Bonaparte has shown us the way –– Hot to be victorious.” (Doc 7). Hungary had decided that enough was enough and that they went through a they put it, “. . . a period of uninterrupted suffering.” (Doc 3). Mazzini said that God gave them their country, so they should fight to get it back. “The means of infinitely multiplying your forced and powers of action . . . was for you by God . . .” (Doc

Miles McClure HIST 3121-E02 8/24/14 Questions 1,2 Q.1 Nationalism- Very possible that nationalism amongst the European states along with the Russian Empire all had a strong view to how Europe should look, and in doing so sparked more fuel into the fire that caused World War I. Old schoolmasters would say “It is sweet and fitting to die for one’s country” states were now being viewed as a person rather than an entity, the only thought process people had in the late nineteenth century and previous years was in order to grow a nation one must take it from another.

Otto von Bismarck-German Unification Nationalism and liberalism were two popular political philosophies of the late 19th century. Nationalism is the aspiration of a people with a common language, culture and traditions to be unified. Nationalism grew into a movement after 1815, influenced by literature, music, politics and economic developments between the northern Germany states. By 1848, nationalism was strong among Germans, but the course to unify German would prove to take time.

Due to geographical isolation of Russia, many Russians were xenophobic; however, much of the xenophobia has to do with a lack of national identity. Many failed to accept Orthodoxy as their one unified faith, and while religion played a big role in the unification of people in Western nations, it did trouble withstanding on its own. After the dramatic changes imposed on by Peter the Great for Europeanization of Russia, behavior towards Russia’s image as a European nation altered. For instance, Western nations held a supremacist view of themselves, and the idea of enforcing cultural superiority over the East was also adopted by Russians. Western nations did not view Russia as a true European country, and Russia’s new identity was dismissed. “The reluctance of Europe to accept Russia as one of

Nationalism started with the revolution of France and England with the Enlightenment principle after the defeat of Napoleon. This created a ripple down effect on the people of Germany, Italy, and other eastern European countries to gains its independence who were groups of people unified by a common language. Both Germany and Italy wanted to embrace Nationalist ideals to strive for European power like England, France, Russia, Austrian Empire and the Ottoman Empire. But in order to gain European power, Germany and Italy had to build industrially and expand territorially. Germany expanded territorially by taking land from Denmark while Italy took land Austria.

During the nineteenth century, a significant gap started to emerge between the dominant Western powers an the rest of the world (Marks). The effects of this gap, built in large part on circumstance and chance can still be seen to this day. The long term impacts of western colonialism extend far beyond the boundaries of the newly industrialized societies, helping build the foundation for western peri-industrial imperialist culture. The causes for a nation’s transition into a more nationalistic identity are usually complex and nuanced, historically these shifts tend to correspond to reactions to periods of great pressure and struggle or periods of great economic triumph and innovation.

Nationalism was one of the biggest contributors of starting the war. It is a feeling of devotion towards a country. This makes one country think they’re greater than the other. Nationalism war promoted during the war because people would be more willing to support their country and their leader. Germany depended on nationalism. Before the war, they used to be German states. Germans believed that going to war was a great contribution to the country. They sent their soldiers off with flowers and chocolate. Other countries’ soldiers also believed that they are doing good to their country. Nationalism promoted war and a reason for a country to get larger through imperialism.

Nationalism was also a new and powerful source of tension in Europe. It was tied to militarism, and contended with the wants of the imperial powers in Europe. Nationalism created new areas of interest over which nations could compete. For example, The Habsburg empire was an amass of 11 different nationalities, with large slavic populations in Galicia and the Balkans whose nationalist desires ran against to the imperial bonding. Nationalism in the Balkan’s also piqued Russia’s historic interest in the region. Serbian nationalism created the trigger cause of the

The French Revolution directly affected the nineteenth century through the creation of many ideologies, one important one being nationalism. Nationalism is a very controversial ideology because of the many diverse approaches towards its true definition. A broad definition of nationalism could be perceived as a strong devotion towards the culture

Nationalism was a growing forces throughout all nations. But, it wasn't always unifying. It was especially strong in Austria-hungry, Serbia, Russia, Balkans, Germany, Europe it's self, and in the ottoman empire. All of these groups had dislikes and likes of each other. Serbia, for example, had a large Slavic population and wanted to gain all the slabs on the Balkan peninsula. Russia liked this too but Austria-hungry did not at all. Austria-Hungry thought that the

Nationalism can be traced to the nineteenth century, European peoples came to identify strongly with communities they called nations. Members of a nation considered themselves a distinctive people that spoke a common language, observed common customs, inherited common cultural conditions, held common values, and shared common

“One day the great European War will come out of some damned foolish thing in the Balkans (1888)." Otto von Bismarck predicted World War One in one simple quote before it even happen.The assassination of the heir of the Austro- Hungarian throne Francis Ferdinand, and his wife Sophie, served as