preview

Parenthood In Prison

Good Essays

Thesis: Because of its participation into harmful mindsets such as pitiless revenge, mercenary capitalism, and systematic racism, the American prison system is destructive to our society and should be subject to a mass reform.
Of the almost 200 recognized independent countries, American prisons detain about 25% of the population of inmates, “though only 5 percent of the world’s population lives in the United States” (Sakala). This obvious disproportion feeds into the notion that the United States prison system is in no way representative of the overall national population and also the population of crime. Of the disproportionate number of inmates in U.S prisons, “blacks are incarcerated five times more than Whites are, and Hispanics are nearly …show more content…

He brings up the idea of a “belief-transmission game” where we believe things that have little to no basis in fact simply because we are told. “Every human culture tells its members that having children will make them happy. When people think about their offspring… they tend to conjure up images of babies smiling from their bassinets…” (Gilbert 175). He goes on to list different aspects of parenthood that are looked at through “rose colored glasses”—which do occur but are not representative of the entire experience. Veteran parents know that the profession is full of ups and downs. This same concept is applied to the public’s belief that minorities are subject to commit a crime. In the same way that one’s perception of happiness could be manipulated by word of mouth, a person’s perception of good vs. evil could be influenced. Media coverage and television depictions of crime and the actual demographics of prisons are flawed in their representation of races and socioeconomic backgrounds. Subconsciously, in the minds of suburbia, drugs, violence, and punishment are personified with distinct physical …show more content…

We often seek to “do unto others which is done to us”. The concept of revenge is directly mirrored in our prison system. Once someone commits a crime, they are then, through the 7th Amendment of the United States Bill of Rights, subject to go to trial before a jury. If a jury of the defendant’s “peers” then deems the appropriate punishment for the crime that they are being tried for. The evocation of the death penalty grew very controversial mostly due to that reason. Essentially what was implied is that a human’s life is put into the hands of total strangers who in most cases are only knowledgeable of a minimal section of that person’s life and character. In an editorial research report on the death penalty, written in 1963, Jeanne Kuebler includes a quote by A. Francart on the appeal of capital punishment. “Capital punishment, its opponents insist, is revenge, not deterrence or protection, and as such lessens reverence for the sacredness of human life. ‘The lesson the scaffold always provides,’ Francart wrote, ‘is that human life ceases to be sacred when it is considered useful to suppress it…’” (Kuebler). A key point that Francart makes in his quote is the idea of revenge. Our society views revenge as a readily available convention to utilize whenever they see fit. Revenge, in its simplest form, deals with the notion that we all must become equal. In the ancient Code of Hammurabi this concept is referred to as “An Eye for

Get Access