In Australia, the patriarchal dividend has an effect on gender relations in many different and complex ways. The advantages given to men in general by the patriarchal dividend can have an effect on a range of areas, including employment, violence, politics, the media, religion, sport, pop culture, and others. While traditional gender roles in Australia may have changed over time, there is the question of how much influence the patriarchal dividend has on contemporary gender relations, especially in light of changes to legal equality. As well, there is variation in how the patriarchal dividend impacts on people given other social factors. What the patriarchal dividend is will be explained in more detail, as well as its impact on the interrelated …show more content…
Gender violence may be seen as a practice which maintains the patriarchal dividend, and that violence is also a product of the dividend (Flood et al. 2007). According to Connell (2005) structural inequality which creates the dividend involves the use of violence in order to enforce dominance, and the forms of gender violence include harassment, assault, rape and intimate partner violence. In Australia, approximately one in five women have experienced sexual violence, and one in three women have experienced violence from an intimate partner (Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission 2008). This indicates that gender violence is prevalent in Australia, so the dividend has a significant impact on this aspect of gender relations. It has been established that women may be disadvantaged by the patriarchal dividend in terms of employment, the wage gap and gender roles, which are issues that are relevant to women’s economic status, and also violence. Economic status is an important factor in domestic, family and sexual violence, with economically disadvantaged women being more at risk of violence, and vulnerable to remaining in abusive relationships (Phillips and Vandenbroek 2014). As well as socioeconomic status, other social factors are important, like disability, age, and race, for example Indigenous women experience higher rates of violence than non-Indigenous women (Phillips and Vandenbroek 2014). This illustrates the idea that the consequences of the patriarchal dividend can have a different impact depending on other relevant social factors. In summary, Australian gender relations are significantly affected by the patriarchal dividend with regards to gender violence, as it appears to be a prevalent phenomenon today, as well, this impact does not affect all groups of people in the same
Family violence in Indigenous communities is linked with the Domestic violence policy (Parliament of Australia, 2011). The Current definition used by the Australia government to guide domestic violence policies. Is that domestic violence “refers to acts of violence that occur between people who have, or have had, an intimate relationship” (Chung & Wendt, 2015, p.202). In addition the policy states that violence in a family relationship to be between two people related by blood or marriage. (Department of communities Child Safety and Disability Services, 2012). Thus family violence must have a separate policy to be able to address the accurate impacts of the problem in Indigenous Communities (Larsen & Peterson, 2010).
For the purposes of this paper, the definition of family violence provided in the Queensland Family Violence Protection Act 2012 is utilised. According to the Act, family violence is behaviour that controls or dominates a family member in any way, and causes them to feel fear for their own, or another family member’s, safety or wellbeing. It can include physical, sexual, psychological,
Western women have traditionally been perceived as the inferior sex, or the domestic partner, subjected wholly to the private sphere, and stripped of legal rights and standing. Meanwhile, men are depicted as the breadwinner, the strong, masculine and dominant partner, who belongs primarily to the public sphere. These historic gender norms have been deeply imbedded within Australia’s social foundation, and although society has gradually shifted away from these roles, evidence suggests that this gender inequality still riddles the modern day workplace. Liberal feminist groups have embraced this issue, and have classified it as being a true barrier to achieving the ultimate gender equality goal. Consequently, these liberal feminists along
The plan aims to concentrate on two forms of violence; that consisting of sexual assault as well as domestic and family violence. Research conducted has demonstrated there is a strong connection between how people view the gender roles on men and woman and violence against woman and their children. The plan is concentrating on prevention, stopping the violence before it starts, offering assistance to woman who have experienced such violence, stopping men from committing violence and using evidence based research to determine ‘what works best’ in order to formulate effective strategies in tacking domestic and sexual related violence in the future. The council recognises that violence against women and children is an extremely complicated issue within Australia and the plan aims to deliver a
Domestic violence is also a result of gender inequality (Furze et al, 2008). Gender acts as a stratification system that creates inequalities between men and women by ranking men above women within the same race and class (Lorber, 2003, as cited by Knoblock, 2008). Because men had a higher rank, they had more power and more prestige than women. This paved way for male domination of women in society (Knoblock, 2008). Gender inequality also reinforced stereotypes about masculinity and femininity i.e. men were tough, authoritative, powerful whilst women were passive, weak and dependent (Knoblock, 2008). These ideas permeated society, and hence provided reasons for men to think that they have a right to assault a woman (Knoblock, 2008). The link between domestic violence and gender inequality is
Out of the shadows and into the limelight, the once hidden crime of domestic violence has recently emerged within the Australian community as a widespread criminal issue. This abuse of power occurs in a relationship when one partner attempts to physically or psychologically dominate and control the other. Inflicting physical harm upon another human being is undoubtedly a breach of the criminal law, yet the Australian legal system takes little measures to protect the wider community from this type of violence. According to Family Lawyer Richard Ingleby, domestic violence has often been condoned by the legal system due to the fact that assaults occur in the ‘private’ realm of the home where legal measures are regarded as inappropriate, and interventionist. However, by overlooking domestic violence as a criminal offence, does the Australian legal system fail to adequately protect the family unit from this form of violence? Recent studies from the Australian Bureau of Statics have revealed that 23% of women who have ever been married or engaged in a de facto relationship have experienced violence by a partner at some time during the relationship. Due to the secrecy that once surrounded this kind of abuse, victims often feel unable to speak out and seek help, therefore even large surveys cannot provide accurate estimates of the extend of domestic violence within the Australia community (Domestic Violence and Incest Resource Centre, 1998). Despite the high incidence rate of
The article constructs domestic violence as an issue of gender, race and socioeconomic status. Women are identified as the “majority” of victims (Taylor 2014). Consequently, the article conceptually represents domestic violence as events of intimate terrorism where one partner violently terrorizes the other partner to gain complete control over the relationship, which is entirely perpetrated by men (Johnson 2012). With that said, Johnson (2012) points out that majority of domestic violence is situational couple violence, where both the man and the
Although Australia’s culture and views on gender roles have now become a lot more relaxed and calm, with some woman having high-status occupations and positions of power within society. There are still stereotypes and generalisations on genders in our Australian society.
According to the World Health Organisation (WHO,2010) a key element to preventing gendered violence is achieving gender equality. Similarly, the Senate report on Domestic Violence and Gender Inequality (Commonwealth of Australia, 2016) recognises that gender inequality in all aspects of life is a main contributor to the prevalence of domestic violence in Australia (p. 3). The United Nations’ (UN) likewise argues that Violence against women is rampant throughout history because of unequal power relations between men and women (UN,
Domestic violence is a major issue with in the Australian society. Domestic violence is defined as a deviant behaviour by a person towards another person in a relevant relationship in any way that controls or dominates another person. (Domestic violence, 2014) ‘The Psychological of Criminal and Antisocial Behaviour’ state that, the primary form of domestic violence is classed as intentional violence. Intentional violence refers to the violent behaviours that are enacted with purpose, its occurs in domestic relationships, where there is a clear imbalance of power. (Mauro. P, 2017)
Since then throughout Australia it has evolved in different cultures and in different ways. They can be thought back to the values of their own societies. In no part of Australian culture are gender roles put in its place, and the continuing ways that gender roles are evolving and will be highly interesting to men and women. Yet a few cultures are resistant to making changes and changing their traditions. Men and women undergo different tasks in some
The article by Pownall (2012) was based exclusively on crime statistics provided by the police. These statistics suggest domestic violence may be becoming more prevalent, but this may not be the case. For example, if the increase is due primarily to an influx of new residents to West Australia and the implementation of aggressive domestic violence awareness campaigns, then on a per capita basis, domestic violence may not be increasing. This essay will investigate whether the prevalence of domestic violence is increasing in Queensland, Australia by examining trends in reporting and survey data.
Domestic violence is an issue that is impacting the indigenous Australian population (Korff, J. 2015).This should be concerning to Australians so that they may help reduce fatal deaths by domestic violence (Korff, J. 2015).
Society sees men with the traits that display more stronger and dominant attitudes that is left women to be in the shadow. Women having a lower income compared to men are not because they work fewer hours, and it is not because they have a lower education level as well (Grant). This shows patriarchy where it revolves around a power system that is organized around the dominance of men. “Even with all of these factors are considered, the result remains the same: a wage gap” (Grant). During the election, it was shown that the majority of the elected members were men (Taber). The results were that 88 out of 338 MPs have been elected into the federal office (Taber), which shows that society does not give many women the opportunity to be
Domestic Violence is a human tragedy, and has been a part of life for many individuals. It is not subjective to a particular group, race, or culture. Historically, the feminist movement preserved the theory that domestic violence is a growing matter because of the continuous power differential between the male gender and the female gender. Remarkably, this approach on domestic disputes unveiled the inner workings of barriers men, women, and children would face when in a domestic violence situation. The feminist theory emphasizes on studying “the gendered nature of all relationships…which aims at understanding how gender is related to social inequalities and oppression” (Marsigila & Kulis, 2015, p. 148). Disastrously, an ignorant notion that once dominated our culture was the belief that emotional agony was less painful than physical brutality. However,