Pay for Performance

Quality of employees work is very critical for company’s success. If planned properly, incentive pay plans may increase employee’s interest in providing better service. This paper discusses

A Performance-Based Pay system is an increasingly popular compensation method used by organizations to increase productivity. A goal for all companies is to try and remain competitive and control costs, this is a reason for performance-based pay systems becoming more popular. This type of system attempts to link compensation to performance. (Gena Richter, 2002) These systems are directly tied to organization or individual performance and are most effective when based on objective measures of quantity or quality of performance. If we wish to have a direct impact on work motivation, it must be linked directly to the performance of desired behaviors. In order for to put this type of system into place, performance evaluations must be conducted regularly , as well as training and development for those with performance that isn't quite up to par. These additional resources will be necessary for our organization if we implement a performance based pay system. (William B. Bernathy, Ph. D., 2004)

A well-articulated compensation philosophy drives organizational success by aligning pay and other rewards with business strategy. It provides the foundation for plan design and administration and anchors current and future plans to the company's culture and values (Kaplan, 2006, p.32). Recognizing and rewarding achievement is the cornerstone of the company A’s compensation philosophy. The mission of the company is to attract, select, place and promote all individuals based on their qualifications. The company believes that performance-based compensation helps attract, develop and retain talented professionals. In addition to base pay which based upon local market conditions and targeted to be above market, the company provides the following types of potential compensation to reward performance:

Pay and Rewards – pay and rewards attract, motivate and retain staff. The employment contract which lists rewards, whether it be pay, bonus or benefits, can remove animosity amongst employees and employers. However, recent research reveals that employees are no longer motivated by a financial reward alone, but

Costco’s compensation strategies offer greater benefits than companies like Target due to an “efficiency wage” (Lutz, 2015, ‘Why Wal-Mart’) a strategy that attempts to lower turnover ratios by paying employees a wage above the industry standard. In turn, this compensation strategy attempts to value employees higher, also implementing a standard of operation that promotes performance and identifies employees who excel. In comparison, Ungar (2013) notes that focusing on the internal workings of the company may have placed Costco at even greater advantage, considering that they reported an 8% rise in profits while Target “experienced [less than]

Compensation strategies within a company are very important. Companies need to invest in offering compensation benefits to their employees because they enhance an employee’s wiliness to stay long term with the company. They also provide a positive foundation between the employee and employer. If an employee is happy and content with the company they work for then this will benefit the company and the employee. The employee will be motivated to do a good job for the company and in the long run the extra money and work that the employer puts in for the added benefits will pay off. In this report you will see how Paid Time off (PTO) , bonuses and merit pay increases will benefit not only the employee but the business.

Pay for performance is an incentive program. A way to compare is when in sports a player can make more money for doing better or meeting certain goals. So if a pitcher pitches a no-hitter he may receive an additional bonus on top of his salary. Pay for performance concerning health care is looking at not only success rates but overall outcomes. This means Patient A has a surgery she comes through without complications, and she heals quickly, is discharged and when she comes back for a follow-up everything is moving along as the physician plan. This is a good outcome. Now if the same patient, acquires an infection,does not heal in a reasonable amount of time or dies then the outcome is not favorable and pay for performance is affected. because pay for performance is difficult to measure in long term situations many times, the outcomes are measured in sections such as various components that create a patient’s overall health rating. for instance, Patient B is 300 lbs suffers from high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and diabetes pay for performance would look at each component and see if the health services being provided are aiding in the betterment of the patients health. At the core pay for performance is more about accountability, keeping medical professionals abreast of what is really going on with patients regardless of income or background.

ABC Manufacturing Co., Inc. is a small company with 120 full time employees. We produce aluminum doors and windows. Although we are highly successful, we find that it can be difficult to retain our valued employees. Human resources has decided to evaluate several compensation plans and

This article examined the necessity of changes required to traditional reward systems in order for employees to remain motivated and productive in the workplace (Lawler & Worley, 2006).The changes that must occur are in response to shifting environmental demands, with reward systems and motivational tactics holding exceptional importance to the ongoing success and longevity to the organization. The article then emphasizes the ineffectiveness of traditional reward systems, such as merit pay. This is largely attributed to how merit pay salary increases are small and become a permanent part of an individual’s pay (Lawler & Worley, 2006). As a result, the relationship between pay and performance is weak and not particularly motivating. As a more effective alternative, companies should look to implement reward systems such as bonuses in the form of short-cycle business periods, as they have shown to be effective motivators as well as flexible enough to compensate for organizational changes. Lawler & Worley (2006) concluded that “traditional reward systems lead to lack lustre performance, and that in order to create a high performance organization, companies must employ different reward systems that motivate performance, reward change, and encourage the development of individual and organizational capabilities” (p.5).

“Year after year, as executive pay continues its inexorable climb, it's amusing to watch corporate directors try to justify the piles of shareholder money they throw at the hired help (Morgenson 1)”. There are many employees that go the extra mile and produce more for their company, but they often never receive anything extra in return. Due to this, they are less motivated to go the extra mile in the future. In contrast, incentive pay is beneficial to an organization’s overall production efficiency and effectiveness.

Although research generally confirms that pay-for-performance plans can influence greater outcomes, it is unclear how effective different pay plans are relative to each other (Park, 2012). Like most things in business, compensation is something that requires evaluation, study, assessment, strategy, modeling and integration.  Achieving a pay for performance culture does not happen without paying attention to the behaviors, activities, rewards and motivations that have to be linked and reinforced through a well engineered and successfully executed process.  Actually if that process does not tie rewards to shareholder financial objectives, employ the proper mix of compensation elements, result in meaningful dollars, embrace performance that employees can impact and are effectively communicated and reinforced, then the results it produces will likely fall short (Vision Link Advisory Group, 2013).

Organizations use pay strategies to assist in the administration of compensation plans. The use of a formal pay strategy allows the assessment and grouping of similar jobs together. Global employers follow different pay strategies because pay strategies are profoundly influenced by different factors such as culture, social contracts, labor relations and management practice. Compensation creates a link between reward and results. Meaning that organizations seek to achieve the return of investments made on employees by motivating and appropriately rewarding them to influence performance, making the design and implementation of effective performance management systems an extremely important aspect of global HRM.

To motivate employees to work towards reaching organizational goals, managers frequently depend on some form of enticement. Beyond monetary compensation, awards and additional types of acknowledgment can be given, and the ability to choose a work schedule is a possibility. A reasonable pay system, which would be an incentive for individuals and groups to achieve organizational goals, is a hardship manager’s face (Jones & George, 2011). Within the company that I work for, every quarter awards are presented to Customer Service Agents who have maintained a 95 percent or above quality score. Monetary awards are given out as well as time off coupons.

Introduction and context Discussion of context is clear and provides an effective starting point for further discussion within the report. The employment relationship is not considered in a great deal of detail and more could be done to set out the broader parameters of the relationship – particularly in terms of the implied

Pay for performance is to link employees’ salary or salary increase to his or her performance. It seems to be a reasonable or attractive idea but it often does not work well in organizations. Please use at least 4 motivation theories or models to explain why pay for performance may not work as expected—particularly in government and nonprofit organizations.