A peaceful resistance is the purpose of achieving a goal through a nonviolent act. For example, some historic events may include, Rosa Parks and her story. In 1955 Parks was sat on a bus awaiting her stop until a white group of people had requested the bus. When the driver had realized that there were no more seats, he told the Parks and the other African American sitting on the bus, to get off. Instead of picking a fight and forcefully fighting to get her way which was to stay on the bus; she simply just didn't move. She kept to herself and refused to get off the bus until she was physically forced by a police officer. Because of her act of refusal, she caused other people in the area to receive the same idea until eventually the African …show more content…
In a good way. People who voice their opinion are the people who are responsible for the positive impact on society today. If people around the world never acted in such a way as in a peaceful resistance, it's possible that it would've taken a longer time for the world to form the society it has today; because people would resist but not in a peaceful manner. I believe that before people had the idea of a peaceful resistance and if people never took advantage of it in the past, that, that's when the negative impact on society comes in. I don't think that peaceful resistance could ever leave a negative impact on society in such a way that physical resistance would. A physical impact leaves room for terror and more violence and its a risk in such a way, that it would be an easy way to lose your life. The difference between a peaceful resistance and non peaceful one is the physical act. In a peaceful resistance, one is not fighting back in any harmful way to themselves or others. As opposed to a non peaceful resistance, people are simply putting their lives at risk for something they believe in; when one can easily do that in a much more safe manner such as a peaceful resistance. Which is another reason why I believe it has a positive impact on society. It gives the option to fight back but not physically. Being physical causes more of a surge and a riot full of angry people as opposed to non physical actions where people form protests and fight for what they truly believe in, (non physically), because they are determined and strong. They don't just fight because they are angry. That is one of the biggest differences as to why peaceful resistance is not a negative impact on a free
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Looking back at examples from history, without Rosa Parks, the Woman’s Suffrage Movement, or Martin Luther King Jr., the society we live in would be extremely different. Civil disobedience continues to contributes a huge positive impact on the world we live in today.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts our free society. It allows us to make our voices heard and spread a message if there is a law that we find is either unfair or goes against our protected freedoms. Peaceful resistance has helped our country grow on multiple occasions. It has always been a part of our countries history and is well protected by our First Amendment rights. Due to this, There is little to know doubt that peaceful resistance has positively effected the lives of many Americans.
Some of Martin Luther King’s ways to end segregation were nonviolent and direct action. The way the people handled this was amazing but at the same time is was incredibly dangerous. The definition of nonviolent, direct action is using peaceful means rather than force, especially to bring about political or social change. Furthermore, examples of non-violent direct action (also known as nonviolent resistance or civil resistance) include sit-ins, strikes, workplace occupations, blockades, or activism, while violent direct action may include political violence, sabotage, property destruction, or assaults.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society, because all committed acts of civil disobedience, all but in very different cases. Have shown a positive impact amongst the people by proving to everyone and the government that every U.S citizen has the freedom to fight for their rights and freedom and not let anyone disrespect their human morals.
Peaceful resistents to laws either positively or negatively impacts a free society. I believe that peaceful resistant to laws does positively impact a free society just look at Rosa Parks, Thomas Jefferson and also Daniel Ellsberg they all helped in some type of way by using peaceful resistance to the laws. In some ways civil disobedience does help the government get better and also some says that it destroys the civil society. From the article ,"Is it right to break the law" by Charles Frankel it discuss is it ever right to break the law and in some situations it is but it also depends on how you handle the situation and what your motives are. It depends on if you are harmimg someone and if your taking a stand and wanting to change something for the better. I do not believe that is showing negatively on society
Peaceful resistance, though controversial, is a positive force in our free society, battling this lingering injustice. It is a way in which we can make our voices heard without risking injury to any part of our country.
Mahatma Gandhi once said that “Nonviolence is a weapon of the strong.” Peaceful protests have been used by people all over the world to communicate their struggles and fight for positive change. Without peaceful protests, citizens would only be able to achieve radical change through violent struggles. Though some people believe that laws should be followed unconditionally, this does not address how we should comply with unjust laws. Peaceful protests are the only way oppressed people can seize freedom and it holds civil servants accountable for their actions and decision. Hence, peaceful resistance is necessary for the betterment of society and maintaining the liberty our father’s envisioned.
I believe that peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. It gives citizens the right to protest against what they believe is wrong without the use of violence. Although it is not right to purposefully break the law it is better to break the law in a peaceful way rather than in a way that could bring harm to other people. Civil disobedience commonly has to do with laws that conflict with people's moral beliefs.
Peaceful resistance has been around for ages and has served for a way for people to achieve goals like social change through the practice of nonviolence. Peaceful resistance has gained much attention in both the past and present, causing others to ponder as to whether such resistance either benefits or harms a free society. There are compelling arguments for both sides, though the argument that peaceful resistance positively impacts society stands to be the most persuasive. Nonviolent resistance benefits a free society because it serves as a method for defeating oppressive regimes and societal norms, it allows powerful leaders to emerge to unite people under one cause, and it facilitates the establishment of lasting democracies. Peaceful resistance has proved to be a way for people to overthrow oppressive regimes and societal norms.
Peaceful resistance in today's society is counted as just as bad as violent riots. As Americans with our constitutional rights should have the ability to peacefully resist anything that we find unjust but within current events it is seen as being a criminal for showing your opinion. I believe that peaceful resistance should have a positive impact on our country and that it should be seen as powerful rather than as weakness caused by the displeasure of events. As a country it is our job to take into consideration the rights and beliefs of all rather than few. For example within my own community there was a peaceful resistance or peaceful protest at our local university in which around 70 to 100 people were arrested simply for showing their
In my opinion I believe that peaceful resistance is a positive impact on our society. If you look at the many marches we have had in recent years, such as the woman's march held a little over a week again as well as all the recent protests involving this years election, you can see Americans expressing their opinions and beliefs for all to see.
A key factor in the success of the Civil Rights Movement was the idea of using non-violent resistance. Non-violent resistance is the method of accomplishing one's goal by protest, civil disobedience, economic or political non-cooperation, satyagraha, and other practices that do not involve any violence. Civil Rights leader, Martin Luther King Jr.’s non-violent resistance was inspired by the guidance of the Indian Leader Mahatma Gandhi. Throughout the 1930s and 40s, Mahatma Gandhi led India's independence from the British rule by communicating to them softly, stirring speeches, and many non-violent protests. He is one of the 20th century's most important figures and continues to be admired in India as a father of the society. King says that
A society is only truly free if the members of the society have the ability to make their own conscious decisions. No successful country operates without disputes and differences of opinion. Therefore, peaceful resistance is not merely positive, but also necessary.
Resistance to laws positively impact a free society. The ability to resist and protest is a freedom in itself, and gives the government feedback from the American citizens. Without peaceful resistance, our government would not know what to change and people would get progressively more mad every day.
Peaceful resistance is a major part of American history, from the American Revolution to the 1960’s Civil Rights Movement to the Travel Ban protests of today. These instances of peaceful resistance shape American society for the better, as the voices of minorities are heard and unjust laws are ended. Peaceful resistance does positively impact a free society, as supported by Henry Thoreau, demonstrated by the 1960 Civil Rights Movement, and anticipated by protests of today.