You are at a baseball game with your favorite team playing against another team. You’ve bought your hot dog, pop, and other refreshments and sit in the bleachers. You have been waiting for this day for a while now, in hopes to get an autograph from your favorite player, but you’ve found out that they have been discounted from the game for using Performance Enhancing Drugs (PEDs) but… why? They can’t be that bad can they? For this topic, most people would say yes and that we should ban all PEDs because they are cheating. But are they really? They are made to enhance your performance of doing a sport right? With this, i claim that we should in fact head the opposite direction and legalize PEDs. Of course, legalize them for professional sports. We wouldn't want the younger still developing people to mess with their growing process. High Schoolers and Middle Schoolers should not have the “opportunity” to use PEDs. But in professional sports, the players are adults and adults can make their own choices. Therefore they have the CHOICE to use PEDs if they wanted to. …show more content…
They just have smaller effects that are not permenit. Such as cannabinoids “can cause restlessness and panic attacks in high doses” (Performance-Enhancing Drugs: A Cheat Sheet, Mossie) the author said “in high doses” so therefore if used right they would help the user. Also, they said “can cause...” so that could mean the effects might not even happen. Although this is just one example of many. Another example could be the diuretics, “diuretics can trigger electrolyte imbalances and lead to dehydration…” (Performance-Enhancing Drugs: A Cheat Sheet, Mossie) i don’t think electrolyte imbalances are that bad, although they can be. Dehydration also isn’t that bad all you need to do is drink lots of water. Problem solved! Even so, overdosing these PEDs is a different
“Commentators claim that performance-enhancing drugs are not right or wrong, simply another strategy to improve performance” (Introduction to Performance-Enhancing Drugs). There are two main problems wrong with the use of drugs being legal. Health of athletes would drop devastatingly, and the true competition would become who gets lucky. “Some mourn the loss of yesterday's baseball heroes, while others argue that sport figures who use performance-enhancing drugs expose flaws in American culture” (Introduction to Performance-Enhancing
Steroids are one of the most common performance enhancing drugs, for the most part it rapidly builds muscle, But as well as build muscle it can cause the user to fly into a rage. This is very dangerous because most of its avid users are extremely strong and large because of the drug. This drug is only one of the most commonly known but there are plenty others and they all have their dangers as well as benefits. Steroids being one of the most commonly known performance enhancing drug, or PED, they are also one of the most common and easily detectable, this being with a simple urine test. So that also means that people who decide to use this drug they must also find a way to test positive while on this drug. There are quite a few ways of doing
The use of PEDs is illegal in sports, I believe that it should stay that way. Many athletes have had their lives ruined from PEDs loosing the ones they love or dying themselves, and there are many horrible side effects that include, mental problems, and even death. Also, when someone is taking PEDs and another isn’t in say football then the person who isn’t could get very hurt, in short PEDs should just be dropped out of professional sports. If PEDs stay in professional sports (illegally) then many more people will die. Weather it is from another person or yourself. Having PEDs in professional sports give the athlete side effects that are hard to live with, doesn’t even guarantee that the drugs will work-the risks are high and the chances of it being good are low- they set a bad example for kids and teens around the world who look up to the pro athletes who take PEDs, lastly it will hurt the other athlete or yourself.
Do you feel that PED’s should be allowed in sport? The problem is that players use PED’s or Performance Enhancing Drugs to get an advantage over their opponents. Despite the advances in technology for discovering PED’s, there is still a great number of people who get away with PED’s. Many people continue to use PED’s and will continue to use them until they get caught, and even after they get caught. Performance enhancing drugs should not be allowed in sports, resulting in more fair competition.
Many argue that PEDs don't do anything for the fighters strength and only help the endurance of the fighter. Many say they do not do any harm to any human beings, the user nor the opposition. "There is no coherent argument to support the view that enhancing performance is unfair; if it were, we would ban coaching and training. Competition can be unfair if there is unequal access to particular enhancements, but equal access can be achieved more predictably by deregulation than by prohibition." (Dr. Norman Fost). "If each of us ought to be free to assume risks that we think are worth taking, shouldn't athletes have the same freedom as anyone else? After all, if we should not forbid smokers from risking their health by smoking, why should we prohibit track stars or weightlifters from taking risks with their health in pursuit of their goals?" (Dr. Robert Simon). To the main points of why PEDs should be illegal, many come with counterarguments, such as qualified physicians and doctors, to prove that illegal PEDs do not provide an unfair advantage against the opposition. PEDs should stay illegal for the very fact that they are hazardous to not only your health, but to others as well. Not only are they illegal but they are also morally
PEDS were not part of the National Football League or the Major League Baseball in the past and it should be kept that way. What makes these leagues so intriguing to watch these athletes perform is knowing that this is their natural ability. An athletes should not put their body in greater risk of harm just for viewership for the league. Work ethic and human ability should be what gets these athletes into the league, not a drug. Commissioners and viewers know that it is morally wrong to destroy one's’ body just to have a more exciting game. Passing a rule to allow PEDS will ruin the credibility of these athletes abilities and shameful to the commissioner to allow cheating. These athletes should be setting an example to the youth. Younger children
Peds can cause blood clots, the increase of heart rate, and heart attacks. “The use of peds in sports has the risk of causing a blood clot, and the increase of the heart rate, leading to a heart attack”. (USADA Effects of peds).The tests need to be stricter before people get seriously hurt. If this is not stricter than everyone with peds will have these issues, and more.
In the brutal, competitive world of sports and athletics where athletes are expected to be perfect and perform at the highest level, there is a copious amount of athletes looking for a way to get the edge over one another. Steroids is often the drug used to give them that edge, but should these drugs be allowed? A person would think it would be an ignominy to cheat but it is becoming quite normal. There was a boy named Taylor Hooton from a small town just north of Dallas. Taylor was in a family full of talented athletes; however, a month after his 17th birthday Taylor killed himself because of steroids. His father was a pitcher in the MLB, and his brother a pitcher in college. Taylor had a lot of pressure on him to be successful, and it forced him to make a risky move that did not pay off. Yes, steroids can help athletes get stronger and better at what they do; however, it does a lot more harm to you than you think. 30% of collegiate and professional athletes take steroids, as do 10%-20% of high school athletes. (Meunier) Taking performance enhancing drugs at any level of athletics should not be allowed because it gives players an
According to sociologists PED’s specifically improve your aggression/competitiveness towards the race or game. It also intensifies muscle growth and endurance. Most of the drugs that athletes use are stimulants which are; amphetamines and ephedrine. Other common narcotics are anabolic steroids, phototropism, and erythromycin. Athletes who do utilize these substances have a lot higher chance of winning compared to the sportsmen who don’t use them. Athletes who choose not to damage their body with drugs will have a higher chance of losing which I personally like to call cheating. An example of someone using these narcotics is Lance Armstrong. Armstrong was an extraordinary cyclist who won over 7 tour de France titles but a few blood tests later he came back positive for using PED’s. Armstrong was then stripped from his 7 impressive titles. Some people might argue that athletes don’t win success on their own, they always have a little help whether it's;
PEDs can and will give you: (Acne, liver damage, etc.) The reasons people use PEDs (Performance Enhancing Drugs) is because the athletes will have a higher chance of winning because some drugs give you better reflexes some make you muscular, and some can make you smart, but… some have deadly side effects; like blood clots and much more. I think that all PED production should be only prescriptions in hospitals. The drugs can hurt you like ruin your liver. They can kill you by causing a heart attack or blood clot. They can ruin your chances of reaching the hall of fame. I know that you may think it is worth it for the money and people but when they find out BAM you’re out of the hall of fame and you have to wait until you stop using the drugs, You also might also have 1 chance or no chances because of using the PEDs. Drugs are only acceptable when you are in a hospital, or if you’re prescribed a drug so you can heal bone or muscle or a medical condition. Eg: if a muscle is torn open they use steroids.
There have been many players in MLB have used and been caught using PEDs and have faced serious penalty. The biggest case as of recent years was the Alex Rodriguez scandal. After a positive urine test, he continued to deny the use of PEDs but later, like half a year later finally committed to using them and was suspended without pay for a whole season. He is not the only player to use PEDs in the MLB but he is one of the ones to be caught in recent years. It is obvious that using drugs to enhance performance is banned, but there is the ethical debate of why? The main reason people come up with is that “ it is, basically, cheating – which implies a theft of opportunity from other players of the sport. When one player gains benefits – monetary compensation, fan appreciation, seasonal honors, statistical records, etc – by using performance-enhancing drugs, he does so by shouldering a lesser burden than players who do not use drugs,” (Belousek 2014). That being said, a lot of players who have been in the game a while and their skills are starting to decrease feel like they need to keep up with the younger generation of players entering the world of baseball. However, the older players are not getting any younger with their age, or their body’s ability, so their way of keeping up is to use PEDs so that their recovery time is shortened to what it used to be so they can keep up with a 162 game schedule. Another example of this would be Chris Colabello with the Toronto Blue Jays last season. He was suspended 50 games for the use of PEDs but claims that he does not know how they entered his system, but many people believe it was the case of not being able to keep up with the younger generation, especially Tom Valcke, who has been around baseball for over 35 years. During one of iCASE’s practices he made this statement, “He may love the game but if
Homicide is one of the most destructive crimes worldwide. Around the globe, more than 40% of homicides are committed with firearms. There are assorted groups of risk factors for example relationship, family, and personal problems. According to statistics, Honduras has one of the highest homicide rates in the world. Race and jurisdiction are one of the leading causes of why homicides are highly prevalent. According to FBI Expanded Homicide Data, there were 742 justifiable murders in the year of 2013. Furthermore, the FBI data also states that 461 felons, were justifiably killed. Homicide is a threat that has become a large conflict to our society, affecting children, teenagers and families.
There are good reasons to allow performance enhancement, to make sport fairer and to narrow the gap between the cheaters and the honest athletes. It would provide a better spectacle, be safer and less coercive” (Foddy) Therefore, with the legalization of PED’s not only would the playing field suddenly be even for all players, it would be at a higher level. Furthermore, athletes on the way up whose entourages don’t yet include savvy physiotherapists and doctors would be less likely to overdose and do themselves harm.
Peds can cause serious health effects and even cost you your life. Evidence to support my claim is “Physical Consequences of Abuse: Joint pain, Muscle weakness, Fluid retention, Vision problems, Carpal tunnel syndrome, Impaired glucose regulation, Enlarged heart (cardiomegaly), High cholesterol (hyperlipidemia), Diabetes, High blood pressure (hypertension), Changes in mood or emotional level, Increased aggression or temper, Muscle Cramps, and Kidney Damage.” (Performance Drugs among professional athletes -Tori Long) some drugs like Anabolic steroids can stunt growth and puberty in
Boundless.com defines ‘Socialisation’ as “a term used to refer to the lifelong process of inheriting and disseminating norms, customs and ideologies providing the individual with the skills and habits necessary for precipitating within one’s society, thus the means by which social and cultural continuity are attained” (Boundless.com, 2015). The process of socialisation involves an individual such as an adolescent to have interactions with various agents of socialisation. Agents of socialisation are factors that play a crucial role in providing an individual with social and cultural skills in accordance with the social norms and standards of the society one is located in