preview

Pennsylvania Department Of Corrections Case Study

Better Essays

In 2015, the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections spent $2.15 billion to house 50,366 inmates, which represents about 8 percent of the state’s total budget. In a typical week, the state Department of Corrections receives a list of approximately 1,000 inmates who need to be assigned to one of its 25 correctional facilities.

Nearly 100 unique factors have to be considered during the complicated task of assigning inmates to any of the Pennsylvania Department of Correction’s (PADoC) 25 facilities. Assigning inmates to correctional facilities is a complex process taking into account factors relating to the inmate, such as criminal history, demographic characteristics, and mental and health needs, as well as relating to the prison system, such …show more content…

PA Calls for a Better Population Management System
The state of Pennsylvania officials set out to solve the complex problem of assigning inmates by putting out a call for a better population management system. Their goal was to make better decisions on inmate assignments to better address security concerns, age demographics, medical needs, programmatic needs and educational needs.
A Lehigh University student team, led by professor Tamás Terlaky, chairman of Lehigh’s department of industrial and systems engineering, answered the state of Pennsylvania’s call and embarked on the project.
The project participants included:
• From the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections: Kristofer B. Bucklen Ph.D. Criminal Justice, Director, Planning, Research & Statistics
• From the Lehigh University ISE department: o Professor Tamás Terlaky, George N. and Soteria Kledaras ’87 Endowed Chair Professor o Professor Louis J. Plebani o Professor George R. Wilson o Mohammad Shahab-safa, Ph.D. Candidate Industrial and Systems …show more content…

The subjective nature of this sequential ad-hoc assignment made the efficiency and quality of the assignment dependent on the experience and judgment of the staff at the office of population management. In order to remove the subjective component of the assignment, the Lehigh University team developed a decision-tree based decision support system to reduce bias and variability in assignments, while improving adherence to the guidelines. This system provided a ranked order of the CIs for a particular inmate from which the staff member can choose the

Get Access