Persuasive Essay : Animal Testing : Wrong Or Wrong?

For many years, animal testing has been very widely accepted in the world for the

The majority of people believe animal testing is dreadfully wrong. As animal testing becomes a popular conversation argument, the main altercation is how unjust and crooked it is. Companies especially those in the makeup industry, have gained popularity and admiration for wiping out animals testing for their products even though the products have actually been tested before put out on the market. Animal testing is now grasped as an abhorrent business, but what others do not realize is that without animal testing, the medical world and other productions would not be as advanced as it is today. Even though it seems as though the cons outweigh the pros, there is definitely a balance between them. Animal testing can save human lives and the medications tested on animals can also become a medication for animals if it works; however, some animals contract diseases easier than humans and can suffer because of this testing.

Every year, a total of one million children die from pneumonia. If you multiply that number by one hundred, you will have the number of animals that suffer painful deaths due to medical experimentation in U.S. laboratories each year. This number includes animals of all types, from mice and rats to fish and birds. These animals are typically used because of tradition rather than actual scientific reasoning, making their deaths all the more cruel. Animal experimentation is not only unethical, but ineffective and expensive. It should be phased out and replaced with technological alternatives.

“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated” (Mahatma Gandhi). Scientists have been using animals for biomedical research for centuries. They provide a source to get information scientists can not get without harming humans. A lot of debate is spread about whether it is good or bad. Animal experimentation is a controversial topic because it is helpful to humans, but it is also cruel and inhumane.

Hey you, yea you. Ever heard of animal testing? Well if you didn’t animal testing refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology, and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medical products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals. So basically test human products on animals. Now my perspective on this is that animal testing is wrong and I will tell you why. I believe it is wrong because it is animal cruelty. They are held against their will. While I am telling you all about this awful process I want you to think about your pets, or any pet doesn’t matter just think of an animal.

Millions of animals suffer due to effects of testing they must endure. This testing is usually done unethically and causes major harm. It’s wrong to harm animals for the sake of testing products for society. Furthermore, animals are living creatures just like humans and should not be treated differently. While testing animals may be cheaper, it is morally wrong and causes many harmful side effects in animals.

Without a doubt, these animals are in pain. They whimper out of fear and struggle to survive in the conditions they are forced to undergo. Many of them are even put into isolation and sedated heavily. They are given no say to how they want to live and are dealt with horribly, which is why animal testing should be stopped because there are many other alternatives that can be used.

Animals endure inhumane suffering from researchers performing animal experimentation on them. Animals are put through excruciating amounts of pain because of testing done for products. According to the website "PETA", " Animals are infected with diseases that they would never normally contract, tiny mice grow tumors as large as their own bodies, kittens are purposely blinded, rats are made to suffer seizures, and primates' skulls are cut open and electrodes are implanted in them". These animals are going through unnecessary painful experiences when they should not be. Typical items that are used in a person's everyday life are first tested on animals. For example, when household items are tested on animals they are very painful to the animals being used in the experiment (Goldberg and Hartung, 86). People do not realize that their use of daily products has been causing helpless animals suffer. Animal testing is the same concept as animal abuse. Animal abuse means animals can be abused mentally and physically. When animals are being used in experiments they are being mentally abused, an example is restriction on food and water and being kept isolated. If animal testing were put to an end, then these innocent animals would not be suffering from this animal inhumanity.

The same wide range of emotions that humans have. More than 100 million animals continue to be locked alone inside metal/iron laboratory cages, burned in painful tests, force-fed toxic chemicals, subjected to crippling surgeries, infected with viruses, traumatized in psychological experiments and deprived of nearly everything that makes life worth living (feelings). Countless rats and mice are still being burned and poisoned in unreliable and archaic chemicals and personal-product tests, even though modern non-animal testing methods are more accurate, fast and economical. A big part of the problem is that the interests of these animals are unfairly written off because of their size, but—like humans—they wince when they’re hurt, giggle when they’re tickled, care deeply for their young and don’t hesitate to rescue their friends, and even strangers, when they’re in distress (feelings they have). When it comes down to it, animal testing is cruel and unusual punishment toward animals. With all the inventions we have, there has got to be a way to make something that can test toxicity or potential dangers of medicines. We also do not know how these medicines could affect us because some medicines affect us in different ways than animals

They are forced to inhale things and possibly make them die or make their skin melt off. They get water and food deprived in some of the experiments and even have a red light on them, so it makes it harder to relax. These scientists restrain them and then burn or use fire on them to study the healing process, but sometimes they do not always heal with absolutely no anesthesia or painkillers. In extreme cases, they tie the animal to a table and break their neck or back while still alive. To see what the chemical did to the strength or their bones and what it did to their insides. When testing shampoo on bunnies, their eyelids are held back by a metal clip for days, so they are not able to blink at all. Almost 100,000 animals suffered in crazy experiments in 2010. These cute innocent animals live their life just to die, and they never see the outside. (“Animal Testing is not essential for medical

Animals feel pain and suffering just like humans which makes all the tests and injections all painful for

There are about 17 to 70 million animals used each year for experiments in the US laboratories. These animals are taken from breeding services or kidnapped from their owners. Agencies in the US such as the National Institutes of Health and Department of Defense fund many of these experiments. Today, there are other options other than putting animals through suffering. Even though the animal welfare act is in place, animal experimentation goes against animal rights because animal testing is unreliable, cruel, unnecessary, and weak testing for science.

There exists a society that routinely tortured animals by immobilizing them, pouring chemicals into their eyes and on their skin, and causing them unbearable suffering followed by a prolonged and painful death for the purpose of making its cheeks a little rosier or lips slightly plumper each day. This is the reality of the United States and hundreds of other countries that employ the method of testing on animals in order to prove safety of cosmetics. According to Karyn Siegel-Maier, “The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C) defines a cosmetic as any product that is applied to the human body to moisturize, cleanse or in some way enhance or alter appearance,” meaning humans constantly

Animal testing, and experimentation on monkeys has been going on for several decades, since the first primate lab was set up in 1940’s. It has always been a contentious issue, however the problem of animal experimentation really became prominent when animal and monkey testing reached a peak during the 1980’s, and evidence was released of animals be mistreated. It was revealed that experiments were being conducted where monkeys were given drugs that could potentially cause pain, but were not being anaesthetised, for fear it would ‘interfere’ with the results of the testing. This was around the time when the ‘Animal Rights Movement’ started to build momentum, and the rights of animals were discussed and debated on a regular basis. It was this that sparked the argument on whether animal testing was morally right, and if it was ethical to perform such experiments on monkeys, and animals in general. Since then, the line between what is morally right when it comes to animals and primates in particular has become further blurred.

Observation and experimentation are how we as humans have been able to learn more about ourselves and the world and universe we live in. One of the most common methods of experimentation is animal testing. However, there are controversies surrounding animal testing. There are some that believe animal testing to be cruel and overdone, advocating for the eradication of the practice and further reliance alternative research methods. Groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and other animal rights advocates fall in this category. There are some that believe animal testing to be an invaluable resource and should continue, such as some scientists and research groups. However, there appears to me to be a consensus that is closer to the middle: the belief and understanding that while there are benefits to animal testing, there are flaws in the practice and there should be changes to increase its efficacy while we simultaneously explore alternate testing methods. Many scientists and the National Institute of Health (NIH) subscribe to this idea. I aim to explore the benefits, problems, and implications of animal testing in order to reach a more informed conclusion about a position that is most validated by the information I have used.