Persuasive Essay On Cloning

Now that we are advancing in technology very rapidly, people are starting to wonder if it would be beneficial to clone humans. Some people say that you can literally save a person's life and create an exact replica of person by cloning. But some people say it’s not humane and it would be weird if there is 2 of the exact same person in the world. People are also concerned because nobody knows how these clones will act. We don’t know if the host will be harmed and we also don’t know if the clones will become evil and destroy the world. I believe that we shouldn’t clone humans simply because we don’t have enough information on cloning.

Six years ago, an event in genetic history changed our perspective on "reproduction" and added to our conscience a new element in the study of biology. On February 23, 1997, the world was introduced to Dolly, a 6-month-old lamb that was cloned from a single cell taken from the tissue of an adult donor. Ever since the birth of this sheep, a question that never before existed now lingers in the mind of many: should human cloning be a part of our society?

They took a cell from an adult sheep’s udder and extracted the DNA. It was then put into a “blank” cell. This was the first time an adult cell had been used instead of an embryo cell. Adult cells do not have as much DNA as embryo cells. After 277 attempts an embryo was finally produced. Six days later the cells were transferred into a surrogate mother. The pregnancy progressed like normal and Dolly, named after singer Dolly Parton, was born on July 5th, 1996. Dolly lived for six years, which is only half the lifespan of a normal sheep. Dolly even had lambs. This first cloning led to many discussions about the morals of cloning. Animals cloned can have various health defects. The discussion even was presented that if humans were cloned they would lack personality and emotions. While humans haven’t been cloned great gains have been

Cloning is the production of an organism with genetic material identical to that of another organism. The word cloning comes from the Greek work klon, meanings “twig,” involves the production of genetically identical animals by a process of nuclear transfer. On July 5th, 1996, at the Roslin Institute in Edinburgh, Scotland, a scientific breakthrough occurred when Dolly, a Finn Dorset sheep, was born. (Seidel, 682) “We transfered 29 eggs into a recipient and only one of them became a live lamb. So you can see it’s a very exciting and encouraging result. The efficiencies are poor and there’s a need for a lot more research.”(npr.org) Where it is a controversial subject, the cloning of dolly the sheep affected the world in a positive way and helped advance medical research in finding cures for diseases.

In July 2000, Dr. Ian Wilmut, a geneticist of Scotland publicized the cloning of a lamb named Dolly. Out of 277 attempts at fussing cells, only 29 of the fused cells became embryos, on which resulted in one pregnancy, which then

It all began with a developmental biologist by the name Kevin Sinclair, who cloned sheep to prove the research and progression of cloning does not cause premature aging in animals. The evoking idea of aging dysfunctions opened with a sheep named Dolly, who was the

I will first speak on cloning and all the details having to do with it. Clones are living beings that are correct hereditary duplicates. Each and every piece of their DNA is indistinguishable. Clones can happen actually indistinguishable twins are only one of numerous illustrations. Or, on the other hand they can be made in the lab. Many individuals first knew about cloning when Dolly the Sheep appeared on the scene in 1997. Fake cloning advancements have been around for any longer than Dolly, however. There are two approaches to make a correct hereditary duplicate of a living being in a lab which are artificial embryo twinning and Somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Have you ever wondered what it would be like if you had twin or even if you had a clone? If you had an illness like diabetes, have you ever wondered what it would be like if you did not? Cloning is the creation of an organism that is an exact genetic copy of another. The first successful clone was in 1997 when scientist Edinburgh cloned Dolly the sheep. She was the first animal to be cloned with an adult somatic cell by using the process of nuclear transfer. She was born on July 5 1996, lived to the age of six and died after being diagnosed with lung disease called Jaagsiekte. (First Cloned Sheep Dolly Dies at 6 page 1).

Human cloning was successfully tested twenty years ago but on a sheep. Surprisingly the experiment was successful and from that point on human cloning became a widely debated topic. Human cloning has developed many different debate topics within it. Some say it is an unethical procedure and it conflicts with many beliefs; safety for women is one of the very important topics and cloning some say that this related to abortion because it is a destruction of an embryo. The government should ban human reproductive cloning because it violates ethical beliefs, women are put at risk, and embryos are destroyed for the purpose of the procedure.

As soon as you mention the word cloning, you are most likely engendering a cyclopean debate. The reason for this is because people are immensely divided on whether or not cloning is a positive technological advance or a negative one. One way to come to any type of conclusion when it comes to this controversial topic of discussion is to visually examine cloning from an ethical, jeopardy, and religious perspective. The rigorous authenticity people need to realize as well as accept is, cloning is unethical, very precarious, and irreligious.

The idea of cloning has been around for a long time. The possible benefits it could bring to both mankind and other life on Earth. However, the morality and ethics of doing just this have only more recently filter to the surface. How can cloning help or hurt?

Recently there has been a bill that would allow the use of taxpayers money to fund both therapeutic and reproductive cloning research of all humans and animals. Many people have suffered accidental medical tragedies during their lifetime. Read about a girl who needs a kidney, a burn victim, a man who lost his leg due to cancer. All of these victims favor cloning and want science to proceed. This is why I want you, Andy Vidak to vote yes on the bill for cloning. Cloning really does help those people who suffered from medical tragedies. Cloning can change many lives, if we do proceed, cloning may be able to cure cancer if cloning if cloning leads to a better understanding of cell differentiation. Rumors say cloning may also lead to a cure for heart attacks, a revolution in cosmetic surgery, organs for organ transplantation, and predictions abound about how cloning technology will save thousands of lives. Many can benefit from this bill and will save many lives. In result people are willing to let cloning continue for those who really need it.

What I am going to talk to you about is a science experiment known as cloning.Although cloning has its negatives it also has positives such as giving life to a new being.We as human beings may not see eye to eye but cloning can go as far as saving lives,or even better,cloning Us Army troops.If your ideal goal is to make America great again we should be cloning 24/7 to get ahead of all the other countries who will misuse it.I’m not trying to make a movie scene here but with double the troops we have double the power and that would mean that no other superpower like Russia will mess around with the US.no one will want a piece of the US military. Also,cloning animals has many great things added to it but cloning humans is so much better in comparison.For example, In the article Reasons to Clone Human beings we get reasons such as gay couples would now to be able to have children of their own which is great.We can also clone organ donors to have more organs for those people in need.Or better yet just clone the whole human body itself.

Advances in science, however, do not come without speculation. In the case of Dolly the sheep, people were afraid that techniques similar to those used to clone Dolly would be used to clone humans. In reality, however, Dolly was a very large push toward a world where adult stem cells ruled over embryonic stem cells. Dolly’s development helped to revive the idea of cloning using adult stem cells, but also redirected the focus of cloning toward whole-human cloning.

Cloning of Dolly the Sheep was a first on many fronts. First, it represented the first mammal ever to be cloned from a somatic cell. It also sets a benchmark on which to evaluate other animal cloning experiments going forward. Secondly, her cloning was the start of controversy and panic in regards to animal cloning, as it raised the question of whether scientists would seek to clone humans too, and the ethics behind such a practice, should it ever be adopted. Over the past few years, animal cloning has yielded remarkable results, and this has given scientists hope of a possible human clone over the next few years (University of Utah Health Sciences n.p.). When such reports of cloning success appear in the media, only few attempts works. However, for every success story, there are many other cloning experiments that have dismally failed. Out of 100 cloning experiments, less than three, at the maximum, yield viable offsprings (Harper n.p.). Even for these few success stories about cloning, problems often emerge later, as the animal develops towards adulthood. Although there is limited scientific explanations for the cause of such high failure rates, most researchers believe that it is an indication of the technical hurdles facing cloning experiments. The important lesson that can be drawn from the cloning of animals is the likely influences in case humans are cloned. While a growing