High-Technology Acquisitions Final Project -Acquisition Proposal: To Acquire: May 2012 Table of Content Executive Summary I A. Purpose I B. Background I C. The Rational for the Acquisition I D. Standalone, Synergy and Premium Valuations II E. Integration Plan II Part 1 - The Rational of the Acquisition 1 1. Pfizer's Strategy 1 1.1. Pfizer Growth Strategy 2 2. Pfizer's Road Map 4 2.1. Pfizer's Acquisitions Rational 4 3. The strategy behind the acquisition 5 3.1. Acquisition Motives 5 3.2. M&A vs. Alliance 5 4. Target Identification 7 4.1. Protalix - an R&D Acquisition 9 5. Synergy Analysis 10 6. Standalone, Synergy and Premium Valuations 12 6.1. Market Value 12 6.2. …show more content…
Purpose This paper presents an acquisition proposal, specifically Protalix BioTherapeutics Inc. (hereinafter: "Protalix") to be acquired by Pfizer Inc. (hereinafter: "Pfizer"). B. Background Pfizer is a pharmaceutical corporate well positioned in the market and aiming to continue its growth and dominance in additional areas. Protalix is an Israeli biopharmaceutical company, revolutionizing the development and manufacturing of recombinant therapeutic proteins through its ProCellEx
The case consists of two major pharmaceutical companies that joint to collaborate their research and pharmaceutical technologies to start a joint venture in India. Both have valuable resources that have benefited both companies during the joint venture. Now both are questioning if there is still any value in maintaining the joint venture in India and will be deciding what will be the best route to take. Ranbaxy Laboratories wants to be bought out, but Eli Lilly is worried of the financial implications of such move.
Ecton is going to position the company to be acquired but the board of directors and clinical advisors has some concerns about the ramifications of that plan. This paper evaluates Cannon’s Phase III Plan on March 1998. Cannon proposed a path for the next year containing five major points (Edward, 1999, 8 and 9). The bottom line of this proposal is positioning Ecton to be acquired by the end of the 1998. One of the crucial concerns of this acquisition is the possible effects on “Ecton’s product development process”. Another concern Cannon holds is the ability of Ecton to penetrate a very harsh market fills with big, established, and advanced manufacturers. Also, Cannon is not sure on how to approach specific market
In this individual discussion post, a review of the acquisition of Wellcome by Glaxo is explored with focus on the complexities of Wellcome’s business structure with Promedico. Additional focus is placed on Ofra Sherman, manager of Wellcome Israel, as to her history with the company, team interactions, reporting chain, and her reactions to the pending acquisition.
The Pfizer case provides an introduction to external analysis. The case highlights the pharmaceutical industry, which has enjoyed extraordinary long-run profitability. The case also demonstrates how broad changes in broad environmental factors (i.e. demographics, technology, culture, etc.) have an impact on industry competition. The case is not especially complex, so it is not overwhelming as a first case.
Since the beginning of the agreement Warner Labs was aware that the partnership with Pfizer represented the risk of an hostile takeover, because of this Warner carefully designed a defensive agreement that allow the partnership, at the same time that avoiding somewhat the anticipated movement and merge proposal.
The Pharmacia merger has expanded ITLT’s scope in establishing direction, strategy, and alignment of IT with the business needs. In place of 25 pharmaceutical products, we now have more than 1000 such products increasing our product portfolio, revenue, and geographical reach. The current ITLT won’t be able to address this enormous growth properly and requires significant structural and processual changes to better support Pfizer’s overall business needs.
Pfizer is a pharmaceutical company ranking number one in sales in the world. The company is based in New York City, with its research headquarters in Groton, Connecticut. Its headquarters are in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. Pfizer owes a lot of its success to
Successful IPO offerings by Quintiles and PPD and their subsequent growth to top 5 CROs in the industry (refer appendix 1), Kendle can follow the same strategy and obtain required capital through IPO. Threats: Kendle is losing contracts to larger CRO’s with international presence, industry consolidation, presence of numerous fragmented CRO’s worldwide, growth of many start-ups through financial roll-up strategy, many CRO’s are on an acquisition spree and Kendle is losing bids to companies such as Collaborative due to shortage of capital, ClinTrials negative performance is affecting other CRO stocks. Competitors: The fragmented CRO industry has hundreds of players ranging from small, limited-service providers to full-service CRO’s, and global drug development corporations which possess significantly greater capital, and other resources than Kendle. CROs compete on the basis of experience, medical and scientific expertise in particular therapeutic areas, quality of work, the capability to handle extensive trials worldwide, medical database management capabilities, and relevant technology to advance research. International presence with strategically located facilities, proximity to clients, and financial capability and cost efficiency are also necessary. In order to build these capabilities for competing effectively, the CRO industry is consolidating as
Pfizer Consumer Healthcare Introduction Identification & Description of Internal Function Data Collection Approach Company's Supply Chain Management Flow Chart for the process 1 2 3 4 5 The Company: Incorporated in 1849 -Market Leader in Healthcare Industry Reliable Marketing and Sales Netwrok Strong Research and Development depratment for a number of years. Patent protection for products Effective Supply Chain Profitable Organization with growth potential -Earnings Before Tax and Interest (EBIT) $18,684 as of 31st Dec, 2012 $15,755 as of 31st Dec, 2011 $11,212 as of 31st Dec, 2010
Pfizer Inc is the largest research based biomedical and pharmaceutical company in the world. Headquartered in New York, Pfizer has major research and development locations in England and the United States. Since its inception in 1849, the organization has remained dedicated to discovering and developing new and better ways to prevent and treat disease, while helping to improve health and well being for people around the world.
The followings are take ways from Pfizer’s primary business activities, stock market research and evaluation of the firm’s overall financial health of historical performance and current trend
Pfizer, one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world, owned by CEO Ian C. Read has proven itself to be a controversial company as it headlines one of America’s largest industry. Making a huge revenue of over fifty billion dollars a year, the company dominates its industry here in the United States, second to none. Taken over in 2010 by Ian C. Read, the company has only grown and they continue to do that throughout 2017. Their journey to the top really began in 2000 when the company made their first major merge. Pfizer merged with Warner-Lambert, another company in the industry. 3 Years after that, Pfizer merged with Pharmacia and then in 2009 Wyeth. These three transactions made by Pfizer led them to skyrocket to the top of the food chain. With the company being so profitable in a controversial industry, Pfizer is often subject to various disputes and negative feelings toward the company. Pfizer has dealt with numerous lawsuits and have even been responsible for the deaths of many users who have used their products. Ian C. Read and Pfizer are “Robber Barons” due to these reasons.
Pfizer’s mission is to, “be the premier innovative biopharmaceutical company." Some of the objectives Pfizer aims to accomplish include: developing new therapies for inflammation and immunology, cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, neuroscience and pain treatments. The corporations’ current strategy is dependent upon: innovation, value maximization, social respect, and cultural ownership.
Over the last decade, the giant pharmaceutical companies have moved away from their reliance on “blockbuster” drugs as a basis of earnings and toward other models. Part of the shift has required going outside the “just invented here” Research & Development model that these corporations embraced in the past. In this article, the first of a two-part series, the authors describe how Eli Lilly moved into “open innovation”—using partnerships
Pharmaceutical industry had already witnessed one of the largest acquisitions in the industry in 2009 (Pfizer's $68 billion acquisition of Wyeth and Merck's