preview

Pizarro's Capture Of Atahuallpa Analysis

Better Essays

1. What is Yali's question? Restate the question in Professor Diamond’s words or your own. Yali asks Professor Diamond "Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?" Professor Diamond’s possible interpretation of this statement could be broken down as such: Why do Europeans create so many inventions and manufactured goods to bring elsewhere? This applies the concept that people of Eurasian origin tend to dominate the world in wealth and power. 2. How does Pizarro’s capture of Atahuallpa explain why Europeans colonized the New World instead of Native Americans colonizing Europe? The Native Americans respected Atahuallpa as a sun god. However, when he was …show more content…

How did axis orientations of continents affect the success or non-success of human beings in various areas of the world? Differences in axis orientation affected the diffusion of both food production and inventions by altering the rate that crops and livestock spread. The major axis of the Americas is north-south, while the major axis of Eurasia is east-west. According to Diamond, a continent with a long east-west axis has an advantage over a continent with a long north-south axis. A crop that has developed in one place can spread east to west rather easily, but it would have difficulty spreading north to south because some areas are more ecologically suitable for the origins of food production. 6. How does the role of germs figure in answering Yali’s question? Diamond refers to the dispute that once societies began to change from hunters and gathers to food producers and farmers that people would begin to build homes to live in that were stable. The regions where food manufacturing took place became denser in population. Societies then began to domesticate animals so they could be used in moving cargo, plowing fields, and doing any substantial work. However, the animals carried germs and bacteria which led to people becoming ill. The weaker individuals died, while the stronger ones persisted. This overall relates to Yali’s question in answering the role that germs …show more content…

He’s telling us that the history can be "scientific" if it is analyzed correctly. Diamond is attempting to debate that historians should use what he calls "natural experiments." He believes that there are several "experiments" where there are two or more places that are pretty similar in many ways but which then turned out differently. Diamond debates that historians can use these; they can look at what was different and what was similar and how the differences led to the differences in the

Get Access