Political Identity: The Conservative Party And The Canadian Liberal Party

Liberalism is the best ideology for Canada’s government and is a good combination of both Socialism and Conservatism. Liberalism takes the finer parts from both ideologies to create a better form of government. Canadians now have a choice in which ideology they like better by this compromised form of government. The centre of the spectrum and the equilibrium of government and individual ownership is the definition of Liberalism.

There are two main political parties you can choose from in the United States, The Democrats and the Republicans. There are also third parties you can choose from. People can choose to be part of any party. We are divided by the left and right side on the political spectrum. The right are more conservative and the left are more liberal. These two political parties show philosophical differences through their viewpoints on major topics. With so many differences between the parties, finding topics or issues upon which constituents agree on can be difficult.

Most of the people in America identify themselves as moderate or they do not know if they are conservative or liberal (Magleby 103). I would rank myself as a liberal on the seven-point-identification scale because from what I know of conservatives, their beliefs clash with mine. According to the political surveys that we took in government class, I am a strong liberal. I have always been against conservative views for as long as I can remember; my family, especially my very conservative cousin that mentioned earlier, did not like that I did not conform to certain roles and scolded me for it, thus, resulting in my resentment of conservatives and conservative views. As I grew older, I noticed that I had unconsciously leaned more towards conservative views as a child because I wanted to fit in and not be the outlier in my family; now though, I can clearly see the faulty logic that my family holds and that it is alright for me to have my own

With the myriad of philosophical differences that occur between the two sides, it is expected for people who belong to each school of thought to vote for, and against, certain measures. Liberals, for example, are more likely to vote for issues that grant more freedom to individuals in their personal lives. They are also more likely to allocate government money for support services for the needy. Wiggins clarifies this by adding that "The main focus of modern liberalism in the United States is voting right for all adult citizens, equal rights, separation of church and state, protection of the environment, and the provision by the government of social services”

A political party is defined as a group of people who come together to contest elections and hold power in the government. They agree on policies and programs for the society with a view to promote their supporters' interests. In democracies, political parties are elected by the electorate to run a government. The United States is a considered a two-party system, with its two most powerful parties being the Republican Party and the Democratic Party.

Political parties are critical structures in the modern society and universal phenomena in most democracies. In fact, they form major objects of intensive study as they are usually the centre of political and social power. They engage in most activities that are of significant consequence in the lives of citizens and link the common populace to the government. Therefore, it is important to understand political parties fully from every perspective of political systems so obtain their real importance in democracies. A political party is basically a group of citizens who converge as voters, activists, electoral candidates and office holders with a common party label and seek to elect party members into public offices. While modern political

my school was one of mostly ‘Conservative’ orientation, but with an undercurrent of ‘Liberal’. I

Canadian to be treated as an equal. Culturally, Trudeau wanted to celebrate and unite the

The strength of the Canadian identity that we, as a society, enjoy today is a direct result of a number of significant historical events. The Battle of Ypres, the Battle of Vimy Ridge and The Last Hundred Days are all events that are recognized worldwide and demonstrate the strength and integrity of our Canadian legacy. Although not all of these battles were won by the Canadians, their valiant efforts and patriotism paved the way to the most historical win at Vimy Ridge During World War 1. Canada helped lead the allies to victory through their exceptional efforts in the battles of Ypres,Vimy Ridge and The Last Hundred Days, which most definitely helped strengthen Canadian identity as a nation

The day I had been waiting for had finally come; it was October 29, 2015, and I was going to vote for the federal election at Thistletown C.I.'s school cafeteria just like any other Canadian citizen. There were two main reasons as to why I wanted to vote that day; one was because I wanted to see a change in Canada and another was that I didn't want the Conservatives to win again since I didn't agree with some of their promises. I voted for the New Democratic Party because their promises in jobs, families, and healthcare can help Canada become more prosperous, affordable. The party which didn't impress me as much was the Conservative Party because their promises on energy and environment, manufacturing and infrastructure, and public finances

There are two major political parties that dominate today's politics, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. The two parties oppose each other’s ideas, policies, beliefs, and values. Hundreds of years have passed since the dawn of the country and its political system. However, both parties have similarities to the original political parties of the United States, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.

A political party, defined as an organization that sponsors a candidate for political office, has power to structure the government through promoting beliefs and practices the party deems necessary for a successful government, influencing voters, and ensuring the election of officials who will advocate for these beliefs and put them into action (Janda et al., 228). Minor parties, or third parties, also have a presence in American politics, though it is much diminished. Minor parties exist largely to promote injustices or protest certain beliefs of the two major parties (Janda et al., 242). The main four types of minor parties are: single-issue parties, created to publicize one specific issue; parties of ideological protest, rejecting the current governmental practices in favor of more radical ideas; bolter parties, split from either of the two major parties; and farmer-labor parties, representing the working class (Janda et al., 241-242). Though these

Most people want to be liberal and free in order to do the things they want. Most people want to be healthy as well, if you think about it closely these two ideas can interfere causing many problems or issues towards someone. While, doing something liberal, somehow a person's health could be damaged. There are diverse ideas oh how things should work out there, maybe if having too much freedom affects others, then it should be restricted; maybe they should not restrict freedom even if it causes damage, or last just avoiding health risks.

I agree with my ideological classification. Actually, I don’t have strong answers to each question. Now, I live in the United States, but my original country is Japan. And, lived in Japan is longer than living in the United States. So, probably, my answers tend to Japanese thinking.

Would you ever vote for a candidate simply because they came from the same ethnic background as you, even without knowing any of their political views? In the article “When ‘Identity Politics’ Is Rational,” written by Stanley Fish, a strong argument is made explaining and defending instances where identity politics is used and why it is important that citizens understand that it exists. Identity politics is when a candidate is only supported because of his or her identity, not their political views or beliefs. Through Fish’s mixed use of logical reasoning, somewhat strong reliability and a minor use of emotional appeal, he is able to construct a solid argument as to when identity politics are appropriate. Fish explains a multitude of examples in a cogent manner that allows the reader to easily follow along. He then continues by using credible evidence, which he provides citations for, that add an immense amount of validity to his article.However he does also make certain assumptions that he does not provide evidence for. Fish also includes a subtle amount of emotion that grasps the reader and pulls them deeper into the article. Fish argues that certain cases exist where identity politics is valid and appropriate, however, depending on the way one understands the definition of identity politics, it can be used in a way that it incorrect and biased.