Entry-According to Porter’s Five Forces Pepsi Co. had a low level threat of entry in the beverage manufacturing. When Pepsi Co. was introduced the only other competitor was Coca-Cola. Dr. Bradham formulated “Brads Drink” while working in his pharmacy, he wanted to create a carbonated drink like Coca-Cola. He shadowed a lot the same steps Coke went through when articulating his carbonated drink and reduced the learning-curve. He produced a drink that everybody wanted to consume, therefore the threat of economies of scale was low. The opportunity to product differentiation of his carbonated drink was high enough that he decided to close his pharmacy and dedicate all his time to perfecting the development of manufacturing and processing Pepsi cola (Gale Business Insite Global, 2008). Rivalry- The firm has numerous competitors in regards to the beverage industry. For a couple years Coca-Cola Company is the only competitor that has sale higher than Pepsi Co. followed by Monster Beverage, Dr. Pepper Snapple Group and Coca-Cola Enterprise (Standard & Poor’s Industry Surveys, 2014). Although there is an extended list of competitors, Pepsi Co. has remained consistent in creating new drinks for the customer to enjoy. The firm has a lengthy portfolio of products starting with the original pepsi cola, to orange juice from Tropicana, Gatorade sports drinks focusing largely on sports nutrition for athletes and Naked Juice centered around super-premium juice and protein smoothies. As Pepsi
The two forces of competition chosen for Pepsi Co. Inc, are rivalry and buying power. As Porter explains in this
PepsiCo is a company has history, big market share and abundant assets which are other small companies do not have, so PepsiCo can use this power to do something other companies cannot do, such as continue merge and acquire organisations to expand the range of products. PepsiCo has asset to acquire and as a multinational company, it can sell the product in different countries, use the resource more efficiency.
The soft drink industry has an oligopoly market structure, with PepsiCo and Coca-Cola being the two main competitors. Coca-Cola is #1 in soda sales, PepsiCo #2 and Dr. Pepper- Snapple #3. Other competitors in the beverage industry are Monster Beverage Corporation, Nestlé S.A., Red Bull GmbH, as well as local and regional companies such as 7-up, Jones Soda, Faygo and Town Club (“Pepsico Inc 's”, n.d). “Approximately 64% and 17% of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo’s valuation, respectively, comes from
PepsiCo, Inc. and The Coca Cola Company have both been in production for ages. Both PepsiCo, Inc. and The Coca Cola Company have become common house hold names through out the world today. Pepsi is one of the best selling products in American history. “Pepsi is the number 2 soft drink company producer, the world over. Pepsi’s number one priority is making sure that their shareholders investments are profitable. Pepsi has been able to achieve this goal for the most part via increased sales, keeping cost low, and spending money wisely. Pepsi takes pride in the name, they have built an excellent brand by deliver a product that is satisfying to
Pepsi Co. and Coca Cola, both are very well known multinational companies. They are so famous that they perhaps don’t need any introduction since almost everyone knows basic info about these companies and their widely used products. Both of these companies have been dealing in the production of flavored waters, plain drinking water and soft drinks for decades now and have always been each other’s competitors in almost all the mainstream products they have been producing.
The Coca-Cola company has been in business since its inventor began selling it in drug stores in 1886 (The Coca-Cola Company, 2009). Pepsi-Cola was invented a short time later in 1898, but at the time it was called “Brad’s drink.” It was later renamed Pepsi-Cola in 1902 (Butler, 2006). Since those early days when the sodas were invented, Coca-Cola and Pepsi have been in competition with each other for the domination of the world’s soda market. Over the course of more than a century, sales have continued to rise for both companies, and they both consistently earn a profit. Both companies
PepsiCo is driven by the competitive spirit of the market which they use it to provide solutions that would help their company as well as others.
Today’s most popular drink was not a drink that was thought of and brought to existence. It was made almost by accident. One with a love for medicine and with a background in pharmacy mixed a few components together and with one taste from his buddies, created what today still stands strong as a powerhouse in the soft drink market. With his new drink becoming so popular, Bradham decided to pursue a whole new vision. Medicine was now behind him, and now he focused his attention on bringing up Pepsi cola to the masses. In 1902 Bradham decided to turn his pharmacy over to his assistant and dedicate his time to making Pepsi Cola his business. On September 23rd of 1902 he filed to register Pepsi Cola as his trade mark (this is the earliest dated document of the history of the company). In December 1902 Bradham formed the Pepsi Cola Company, a corporation under the laws of North Carolina. In 1903 on June 16th the U.S. Patent Office accepted the mark and Pepsi Cola was registered. Pepsi Cola was now a fully functioning company. (Copeland,
In 1886, the Coca Cola Company was developed but it wasn't until 1898 that the fierce competitor Pepsi-Cola entered into the market. These 2 companies are the two major players that dominate the consumer beverage (soft-drink) industry. Coke and Pepsi have since been competing to rein the global market in consumer beverages. The market of drinks in the United States alone is valued at more than thirty million dollars annually. With the growth of these two companies, PepsiCo has developed and acquired additional products outside the scope of just the consumer beverage industry, these products have helped the company to increase their exposure and position in the global market. This has not been the case for the Coca Cola Company; they
The net profit was $6,320 million in FY2010, an increase of 6.3% over 2009 ($5,946). As stated in the mission statement, they seek to produce financial rewards. With the numbers previously mentioned, we can see they have succeeded. This significant financial performance gives them the resources they need to provide opportunities for growth and enrichment to their employees, their business partners and the communities in which they operate and to invest in the four key areas (performance, human sustainability, environmental sustainability and talent sustainability) so they can reach their goals. (Yahoo Finance, 2011) 4. Conduct a competitive and marketing analysis of the organization to determine strengths and opportunities. PepsiCo is the largest snack and non-alcoholic drink producer in the United States, with 39% and 25% of the respective market shares. PepsiCo operates in over 200 countries, with its largest markets in North America and the United Kingdom. PepsiCo has three direct competitors, the Coca-Cola Company, Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, and Kraft Foods. Unlike its major competitor, Coca-Cola, the majority of PepsiCo 's revenues do not come from carbonated soft drinks. In fact, beverages account for less than 50% of total revenue. Additionally, over 60% of PepsiCo 's beverage sales come from its key noncarbonated brands like Gatorade and Tropicana. PepsiCo 's revenues
With Pepsi having beverage and snacks a competitor of the company will have to have beverage, snacks, and more. The competitor will have to add more just too top Pepsi sales. The company must be a step or two ahead of the game at all
This research paper pinpoints the financial analysis of Pepsi Co, Inc., namely its profitability; liquidity; solvency and operating outcome with respect to its competitors, Coca-Cola Inc., and Dr. Pepper Snapple Group. The upshot of Pepsi’s financial breakdown will assist the soda drink maker to improve its production approach and keep its flagship brand aggressive and competitive.
“Coca-Cola brands are available to consumers throughout the world. Today they account for 1.7 billion servings of all beverages consumed worldwide daily. Coca-Cola has the edge in the market and because they are first to capitalize on new consumer trends. They continue to focus on continuous operating improvements, and they are ever changing to meet market demands. Pepsi Co satisfies the needs of its customers with the wide variety of products offered. They also have the different type of beverage or snack and its brands can substitute for each other. Coco-Cola and Pepsi Co is known as the top 100 most valuable brands in the world.
The last two topics within Porter’s Five Force Analysis are the threats of substitutes and new entries. The threat of substitutes for PepsiCo and Pepsi products could be considered quite high. In recent years, Americans have been cutting back soda consumption, approximately 1.2% in 2015, and 0.9% in 2014 (Taylor, 2016). Customers have been replacing soft drinks, in particular, with water, coffees, and all natural juices. This also leads the way for the threat of new entries. As people are tending to lean away from traditional soft drinks, the threat of new entrants could be considered moderate. This is because the cost of entry is relatively low as it is not a technology driven industry. Most of the cost of entry would be related to branding and marketing of the new product (Thompson, 1996). In recent years many competitors have entered the market with desirable ingredients and non-soft-drink beverages.
According to PepsiCo SWOT, “it is better equipped to satisfy the needs of customers with a wide variety of successful products” (2008). PepsiCo managed to present almost every type of drink and food brands. The merchandise that is earned is the majority of their revenue. This makes them extremely at risk to change any of their marketing products. However