I believe that the US Presidential election should deserve all the media attention it is receiving because the USA is one of the strongest world economies and will have a massive influence on other country’s economies. The US politics are known to be very complex. Even though we’re inundated with the media coverage of this election, it can still be difficult to figure out what exactly is happening. In 2014 it was stated that more and more americans are using cell phones to follow political news with 28 percent of registered voters. In other words, people are following election news and development in which this can help them understand more of the US politics from looking at social media sites and blogs. As every economic situation in the world
November 4, 2008 marked a monumental moment in United States history. American presidential elections were revolutionized because of the 2008 presidential election between democratic candidate Barack Obama and republican candidate John McCain. After eight years, President George W. Bush., Americans were waiting for, what would be the key word of this election - change. The U.S. had the opportunity to witness history with either the first African-American president or first female vice president. It was a full year of pricey campaigning, nationally broadcasted debates, and party strategies, media controversies involving candidates and their families. It also was a year where America realized how the Internet can affect an election. In June
These 29 representatives are then sent off along with the other 509 from the rest of the country to vote for who the next president will be. The catch is, although the idea of the Electoral College’s is to vote for who the majority in your state has voted for it is not technically mandatory, meaning they have the ability to vote for whomever they chose. Moreover the Canadian system proves to be much more effective for various reasons such as the use of MP’s that represent a geographical population rather than area. Elected members represent cities and towns instead of representing parties and labels. Voters have the ability to choose between party leaders and representatives rather then parties. The Electoral College idea allows for the possibility
Television has been influential in United States presidential elections since the 1960’s. But just what is this influence, and how has it affected who is elected? Has it made elections fairer and more accessible, or has it moved candidates from pursuing issues to pursuing image? The media only impacts the American Society, especially for the presidential election as it increases the talks in politics and gives the president a higher role to follow. The television race captures more popularity than what a citizen is actually voting for.
As politics roar between foreign policy, presidential campaigning and for a while now the vacant seat from the late Anthony Scalia, we can see opinions from both parties for and against the filling of the seat for many reasons. As the US nation, wide spreads the presidential campaign, we see many viewpoints, drawing in from all over for the nominee pickings in November, with not a large choice in the presidential race we see much of the fighting rebelling against the vacant seat too. With politician's voice suggesting that the people have a choice of who fills the seat, while the president and congress have other thoughts, has created a large split between the houses, while the Supreme Court is equally split to figure out how to unequally figure
Television has been influential in America’s elections since the 1960’s, and as TV continues to grow, so will the influence it has over the people. Many people believe whatever comes on their television screen, and don’t think twice to counteract the information. As America continues to televise presidential elections and politics pertaining to that, the elections will be frequently unfair and biased, the candidates won’t be able to completely focus on what’s important, like their imagine instead of their ideas. Television may give more substantial access to millions of more people, but that could change that end result of the presidency for better, or for worse.
Barrack Obama’s tenure as President of the United States is coming to a close and voters should understand how to gather reliable information on new candidates, such as Jeb Bush. Even though paying attention to all four major types of media platforms; digital, legacy, a candidates’ own media, and social media, creates a sound informative opinion on Republican Presidential hopeful Jeb Bush, digital media provides voters with the most holistic view. The benefits of digital media, throughout the week of September 15th through the 22nd, created an opportunity to construct a different point of view on Bush and what he stands for.
The 2016 election has been the first election where social media has been a key player to how people got their information. Statistics say “44 percent of American adults said they had learned something new in the past week about the election from social media.” However, with social media such an important influence on the younger generation it is important for all of this information to be legitimate and truthful. Google and Facebook have recently changed their policies to try to stop fake news articles from popping up within their ad space. The spread of fake news articles skews the public's perception of the candidates. The guardian talks about how the American voter is not just one demographic (college educated individuals, white men, minorities etc. ) because of this lack of (straightforward), it's hard to get an accurate prediction on who would have won the election. Additionally, the media affected the election negatively because they did not give the general public enough information to understand the statistics that they were
The invention of the television has had an impact on all aspects of American's lives. It has affected how we work, interact with others, and our foreign relations. One part of American society that it has especially affected is presidential elections. Television has impacted who is elected and why they were elected. Since the 1960's television has served as a link between the American public and presidential elections that allows the candidate to appear more human and accountable for their actions; consequently this has made television a positive influence on presidential elections. But it has also had a negative affect on elections, making presidential candidates seem like celebrities at times and making it easier to publicize mistakes
The 2016 presidential election has been one of the most interesting election cycles in recent history. Most people in the U.S. and around the world were shocked by Donald ‘trump’s victory because Trump’s election is an unmistakable rejection of a political establishment, and an economic system that simply is not working for most people. Also, he shows unconventional leadership style, and he has never held elected office of any kind. Donald’s Trump should not have been elected to the U.S. presidency for moral, social, and economic
For approximately 227 years there have been presidential elections. During those 230 years we have had 44 different presidents and the 45th president is going to be decided in less than 2 months. The 2 main party candidates this year are Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton is the Democratic Nominee and the wife of former president Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump is the Republican Nominee and have already been in the spotlight for many years as he is a famous businessman. As of September 27th Trump is ahead in the polls not by a massive percentages though, and that’s probably because she is more dignified than Trump. However the polls are closer than ever as Trump is turning more dignified and it’s starting to become very close. During this essay I will break down the facts and compare the pros and cons of both candidates and trying my best not to be biased.
During the election, media has grabbed at any information regarding the candidates imaginable. The avalanche of media coverage takes away from essential facts that an informed citizen requires to make a responsible decision when
As we approach the final day of the US election, polls show vantage for Clinton, the representative of the democrat party over Trump, the representative of the republic party so far. FiveThirtyEight, Nate Silver 's predictions and polling data for the 2016 presidential election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, tells, 49.2% of the popular vote goes for Clinton and 44.5% of the popular vote goes for Trump. These popular votes conducted in November 2, 2016. Clinton and Trump are the only candidates who remained in the race in the final stages representing their parties after the other candidates lost chances in competition. They have completed all the three presidential election debates and they are about 1 week away from the final day of the US election. There are few states remained undecided about the future president. The undecided and changing states are the ones which will determine the wining candidate in the final day of the elections. My prediction for the US election result is that Clinton is going to win the race. The factors shape the election results are the campaign events, tactics and the media influence. In this paper, I am going to discuss how these two factors are contributing in Clinton campaign then I will propose a strategy for Trump to help him wining the race.
Over the past seven decades, this nation’s voter turnout has been dismal. The presidential election in 2012 had a voter turnout of about 57.5%. That means a little over half of the voter population did not voice their opinion on who should be the nation’s president for the next four years in the voting booth. If this continues, there will be a president whom the general public may not want but could have prevented if all they did was vote. However, the upcoming presidential election seems to be different from previous elections just due to the massive amount of attention it is receiving in the media. Fox news had their largest viewer turnout when airing the republican debate, hitting a record of nearly 24 million viewers and the same goes
Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump by 15 percentage points among early voters surveyed in the past two weeks, according to the Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project. Clinton gets an advantage over swing stats such as Ohio and Arizona, and in places like Georgia and Texas which are the Republican Party strongholds. About 19 million Americans voted so far in this election is considered as much as 20% of the electorate. It’s good that she has so many ballots befoe the Nov. 8 election. The FBI have been examining newly discovered emails belonging to Huma Abedin, Clinton’s close aide. They were found on Abedin’s estrange husband’s computer, during an unrelated investigation in the messages he allegedly sent to a teenage girl. The survey was
This has been one of the craziest and exciting presidential elections of all time. All three debates were wildly entertaining and interesting to watch. The question is, after all of this who what I ultimately vote for? Throughout all the journals I've written and the two commercials I’ve watched, it’s honestly a very grueling decision. Both candidates have their pros and cons, but with both candidates, their cons outweigh their pros. Most times that they are featured on the news are from negative instances rather than positive ones. Most likely when America votes they are going to vote for who they dislike the least and in my opinion I feel the same exact way.