Pro Euthanasia Persuasive Essay

[1]Euthanasia, derived from Greek literally means good death. It is the act or practice of killing someone who is terminally ill or injured in order to prevent any more suffering. Some people could call it mercy killing. But is killing someone prematurely right? Why haven't more countries legalized euthanasia? Ask someone involved in caring of the terminally ill, they would simply argue that it is a slippery slope to assisted murder.

The ultimate value of life depends upon awareness and the power of contemplation rather than upon mere survival. Aristotle

Death is final. Some die naturally in a peaceful manner while others suffer through tremendous pain in order to get there. Euthanasia is the only way for some people to leave all their pain behind. Euthanasia is the act of killing another person in a merciful way. Of course, euthanasia has many more meaning to it than that. A person that is suffering from a terminal illness decides that life is not worth living because there is too much pain involved and ends his own life, would that be wrong of him? That is the question that is at hand.

Imagine that you have stage 4 lung cancer. The doctors say you only have 2 months to live. Every morning you have to get chemo and surgery to try and fight the cancer, and you cough up blood and you're just in pain. Wouldn't you like to know that you have a painless way out if your life becomes unbearable? That's what Euthanasia is. It’s a painless death that a doctor can prescribe for you if you’re terminally ill. So far it’s only legal in Washington, DC, California, Colorado, Oregon, and Vermont. Thats only 5 out of 50 states. If you’re terminally ill and In immense pain that means if you don’t live there, you’re going to have to move to one of those states to go peacefully. Euthanasia should be legal in all 50 states so people can be at peace knowing they have an exit slip. Plus, in greek it literally means, good death.

Throughout the history of the entire world, things have constantly been changing. Societies have been created and flourished, humans evolved, new technologies have been created, and new theories discovered. However, with so many advancements in the human world, there are some things that cannot be stopped from happening or change. Organisms can get an illness at any moment in their lives from many different causes. Some illnesses cannot be cured, can cause unbearable symptoms or pain, and can cause you to lose your life, such as cancer. If a person is terminally ill, their illness will be the cause of their death no matter how much treatment is received.

Do you know anybody that has illness or disease where they just wished they wouldn’t have to live through it because they were so miserable from pain or just because they couldn’t function by themselves? Euthanasia is a type of lethal injection that allows a patient who has an illness or disease to get rid of the pain and suffering by ending their life. This injection is administered by their primary physician. There are only four countries in the world where euthanasia is legal and there are six states in the United States where physician assisted suicide is legal. Laws based on Euthanasia should not be enacted in Alabama because it is unlawful, a patient can be incompetent to make such a decision, and the evolution of medicine could change someone’s life if they choose not to use physician assisted suicide.

Death by choice or euthanasia is a very controversial subject that is typically one-sided. The very concept of death alone is somewhat a taboo, but controlling death itself is another monster. Death by choice or “euthanasia” should not be legalized because it promotes defeatism, may lead to the strict procedures to become more accessible to people with non-fatal illnesses, could legitimize murder, or pressure the elderly.

Albert Einstein once said, “The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” Allowing a person to suffer is unnecessary, especially when the individual wants to succumb. Dying is not a crime, and it should not be considered one. A person’s destiny should be determined by the sufferer themselves, not the government. Sue Rodriguez, a Canadian advocate, stated, “If I cannot give consent to my own death, whose body is this? Who owns my life?” Each human owns their body. Therefore, people deserve to have a voice about their future. Euthanasia should be legalized in the United States, because patients with terminal illnesses deserve the right to decide their own fate.

One of the most burdensome aspects of working in the medical field, specifically as a nurse, is the loss of a patient. Similarly, watching a patient who has been diagnosed with a terminal disease struggle with their upcoming death is wearisome. Suffering in the hospital, their life is not of quality and their family is watching them struggle. Highly debated, physician assisted suicide has been named one of the options for terminally ill patients. Physician assisted suicide occurs when a terminally ill patient makes the decision that they would prefer to die, rather than suffer the rest of their life; then a physician can assist them in death by either administering euthanasia to the patient or prescribing the drug to the patient. There are currently, according to Death With Dignity, six states that have legalized physician assisted suicide: California, Colorado, District of Columbia, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington (“Death With Dignity Acts”). While physician assisted suicide is not widely supported, lawmakers should work towards the removal of bans in many locations of physician assisted suicide and towards legalizing; it violates no federal law, end of life care isn’t efficient enough to eliminate mental suffering, animals are euthanized for the same reasons, and it ends the patient’s suffering.

Euthanasia on human beings, also known as assisted suicide, is the collaborate killing of a patient with a terminal illness or a debilitating physical disability in order to end their suffering. The debate on this topic has been fought between the two sides for years. Those opposing assisted suicide as an option for patients claim that patients should not be allowed to die on their own terms because it is legalizing murder, costs too much, and is not morally correct. Because of the limited number of states (five as of 2015 when California passed a bill legalizing it) that euthanasia performed on human beings is legal in, many nurses and physicians have been involved illegally and have been punished for fulfilling the wishes of their patients (Richardson 1). For example, Jack Kevorkian, also known as “Dr. Death,” was “a pathologist who assisted people suffering from acute medical conditions in ending their lives” and eventually spent time in prison for his work (“Jack Kevorkian” 1). Some patients also resort to trying to kill themselves alone, which is more dangerous and risky than what could be done by an authorized physician. Instead of restricting access to physician-assisted deaths, assisted suicide should be legalized by all states in the United States of America for those with terminal illnesses and physical disabilities (and, in some cases, those with mental illnesses) because not doing so would be restricting the rights of people who fall into the aforementioned

The debate over the use of euthanasia is ever growing. This is due to the fact of constant increases in medical advances. Medical advances are growing the number of medicines one can be given before palliative care is an option. The main concern of the debate is whether trying new treatments and medicines are necessary before palliative care is given. Two articles will be analyzed using the Aristotelian method. Both articles are valid, but the New York Times article written by Haider Javed Warraich offers a complete perspective using all three persuasive appeals compared to the article written by Terry Pratchett for The Guardian, which the majority is written on emotion.

It’s blatantly obvious that euthanasia should be permitted for the reasoning of your own individual rights. If you’re not familiar with the term euthanasia it is a Greek word for easy death. Also meaning “The painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma.” Euthanasia is illegal in most countries, for the fact that you're taking rights away from another human being.

Since before the thirteenth century, euthanasia has been a prominent debate worldwide and yet we have still not come to a conclusion. With so many factors, such as religion, politics, cost and the public's general opinion, playing a part in this decision, how do we choose whether it is right or wrong? Euthanasia protects a patient's dignity in death, benefits the family of the ill, and could be considered a human right, therefore, I believe euthanasia should be legalised.

as citizen of the United states, one should have the right to die if a diagnosed with a terminal

A U.S Marine Corps veteran of Iraq is living the American dream. He is married and has a little boy along with a job he loves. In an instant his life has changed. It is when he finds out he has cancer. The neurosurgeon tells him that there is nothing they can do. At that moment, euthanasia is an option. He might have taken it, but with family support he came through it. Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, is ending someone's life to relief pain or illnesses. Euthanasia is a controversial issue because there are people who think it is a good option for patients to take, while there are some who thinks it's not the right choice. By all means, euthanasia should not be legalized because it is a rejection of the importance of lives, it goes against a doctor’s duty, and lastly, it would not only be for the terminally ill patients.