Professional Learning Reflection Team White : Krista Tharp Essay

The two strategies identified are effective strategies. Education has always acknowledged and recognized the connection between an individual’s behavior and their surrounding environment. Antecedent intervention strategies aim at introducing modifications so that incidents occurring before the problem occurs are either removed or altered in some way such that they no longer prompt the problems and can even extend to increasing the likelihoods of the desired behavior (Kern & Clemens, 2007). This strategy has several layers, as at the universal level it can focus on organizing the environment to avert problems and increase motivation. This then creates a safe environment but also creates a conducive environment which supports learning. This strategy tends to have an instant

It is exceedingly important for schools to ensure a balanced and stable environment that provides safety, well-being, and acceptance to all students. In order to do this, as well as generate a positive communal learning atmosphere that empowers the entire student body of the school and the individual classroom, there needs to be a school-wide positive behavioral intervention and support (PBIS) system implemented. The defined explanation of PBIS is “a framework for enhancing the adoption and implementation of a continuum of evidence-based interventions to achieve academically and behaviorally important outcomes for all student” (Sugai and Simonsen, 2012). The goal of a PBIS application to a school’s community is to develop appropriate standards

McKevitt, B. C., & Braaksma, A. D. (2008). Best practices in developing a positive behavior support system at the school level. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed., pp. 735–747). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

1.5 - Explain why the least restrictive interventions should always be used when dealing with incidents of challenging behavior?

The author, a professor of special education, is an expert in the areas of behavior disorders, the assessment and treatment of behavioral disorders and interventions for behavioral disorders. This article provides an objective and useful discussion regarding the relationship between Behavior Intervention Plans and the issues that must be address by school staff when developing and monitoring them. The author also provides readers with specific areas which must be address when developing Behavior Intervention Plans. The information provided may be useful for teachers and school staff.

The goal of this program is to 1. Change a student’s behavior, 2. Change the behavior of the teacher, 3. Or a combinations of both. The behavior modification approaches are directed toward helping a teacher manage the behaviors in the children in the classroom.

Throughout the years education has taken many different directions, each direction presenting new positive and negative outcomes. One of the newest directions the school system has taken is the inclusion movement. As a result of the inclusion movement some other changes within the classroom have been made. This includes behavior management programs. This has led to the development of Positive Behavioral Support.

The Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc. (BACB) has adopted ten guidelines for professional conduct for behavior analyst. Guideline four discusses, The Behavior Analyst and the Individual Behavior Change Program. The guideline states, “The behavior analyst (a) designs programs that are based on behavior analytic principles, including assessments of effects of other intervention methods, (b) involves the client or the client-surrogate in the planning of such programs, (c) obtains the consent of the client, and (d) respects the right of the client to terminate services at any time.” Within guideline four, Least Restrictive Procedures 4.10 dictates, “The behavior analyst reviews and appraises the restrictiveness of alternative interventions and always recommends the least restrictive procedures likely to be effective in dealing with a behavior problem” (Bailey & Burch, 2011.) Based on our ethical guidelines as future behavior analyst we must guarantee our clients interventions are the least restrictive. Promoting least restrictive interventions in school settings ensures the utilization of antecedent manipulations. Utilizing antecedent manipulations may assist with deescalating or preventing further maladaptive behavior. Preventing maladaptive behavior decreases the risks of potential negative side effects such as emotional responding. Employing our ethical guidelines ensures the dignity of our students and promotes student independence.

One of the most crucial parts of successfully managing a classroom does not only have to do with providing a child with a great education, but also having the ability to successfully manage behavior in order to have a strongest learning environment possible. There are two important questions a teacher needs to try to answer when collecting data on a behavior. The first is "does the target behavior happen frequently enough to warrant a formal intervention program?" (Lee, 2011) , as well as "Has the intervention changed the target behavior to a more acceptable level?" (Lee, 2011). These questions can be answered by knowing how to successfully track and monitor behavior with the use of tracking behavior through data summarizing sheets and graphs,

Teachers will develop new skills, receive interventions and broaden their knowledge of behavior interventions and strategies to use in the classroom setting. Research based strategies and interventions will be provided so that participants are able to pick up useful skills to build a successful toolbox of strategies to use for Tier 1 behavior support and interventions.

The purpose of Response to Intervention is early detection and identification of learning concerns of students and the development of an individualized plan that addresses the appropriate prescription for resolving the students’ academic or behavioral issue. In our twenty-first century learning communities, students are required to participate and are engaged in educational activities that may challenge their ability to grasp the concept in manners conducive to their learning styles. Schools are challenged to examine their methods of instruction to meet the needs of all children making them successful in all areas of academic content. “A quality school is a place where students learn to think and apply knowledge to new situations, where students are involved in and excited about their learning, where students make individual gains in process and knowledge, where adults know they care about individual students,

Intervention: CSP, MHS and Deonte discussed the youth’s recent behavior in school. CSP and Deonte process the incident of hitting a peer in music class. CSP and Deonte reviewed how a good and bad day look for him to compare his behaviors on each day. CSP and Deonte practiced different ways the youth could respond to peers and teacher when redirected. CSP, Deonte and MHS reviewed IPOC goals and possible activities for the youth.

The strategies used by classroom teachers are based on the individual child, there is no golden ticket that works for every child. There are general guidelines to develop strategies that have proven effective for many. To start it suggested that well establish routines are important, the use of graphic organizers to aid in the gathering and odering of information, limit outside stimuli that may distract and consistent clear expectations are all highly recommended.

Increase parental involvement and parental contact by teachers through the use of Power School resources.

For students in a self-contained classroom, cueing and behavior modification are frequently used components of behaviorism. Cueing is using a method other than a verbal reminder as a way to encourage appropriate behavior, or discourage inappropriate behavior (Standridge, 2002). Behavior modification, as outlined in Foundations of Workforce Education, is used “to elicit better classroom performance from reluctant students” (Brewer, Campbell, & Petty, 2000, p.17). Behavior modification involves several components, such as determining what is desired, creating specifics within the environment, identifying appropriate rewards, reinforcing behavior patterns,