preview

Pros And Cons Of A Dystopian Society

Better Essays

Katie Rogers
PSY 379
Professor Rottman
12/18/15
Final Paper A utopian society is seen as the ideal future for the world. However, very few people can actually agree on what this utopian society should look like or how it should be brought about. To make things more complicated, some people’s view of a utopian world is another’s view of a dystopia one. Yet, by understanding and working with those of differing views, it is possible to at the very least take a large step towards creating that utopia world. I believe that this first step is to have a world where the human race manages to coexist with nature; a world where wildlife conservation and mass extinctions are no longer a major issue. As this is the only Earth we have and the other animals …show more content…

This is likely due to out-group degradation. We tend to not feel as motivated to help people who are part of a different social or cultural group compared to those who are part of our own group (Cikara et al., 2011). This disconnect would definitely increase when the differences span across species and not just social or cultural groups. Therefore, to even begin getting people to care about the human-induced plight experienced by animals, I will have to get people to see animals as part of their in-group. This can be done in a number of ways. While I can definitely work on getting people to take the perspective of animals by running simulations or increasing contact with wild animals as has been shown to work in the past with different human social groups (Cikara et al., 2011), it is not really feasible to attempt to do this for the whole world. A better way to achieve this goal might be to create fictional stories that have the main characters interacting with animals that have been driven from there homes by humans or have lost their family members due to human influences to the environment as fictional story-telling where the main character interacts with stigmatized groups has been shown to decrease out-group degradation (Vezzali et al., 2015). This would also make it easy for the whole world to have access to the stories without having to directly engage with every social group in the world. However, this decrease in out-group degradation only really occurred when discussion sessions occurred after reading the passages, so these discussion sessions would also likely be necessary (Vezzali et al.,

Get Access