Pros And Cons Of Lowering The Drinking Age

Lowering the Drinking Age In America today the age 18 is the transition to adulthood. Many rights are changed at the transition. One of the freedoms withheld is drinking legally.The drinking age should be lowered because in america today the age 18 is the transition to Adulthood. Many of the rights a person didn’t have they now have when they transition to age 18. When a person turns 18 one of the freedoms withheld is drinking legally. If the right was passed to be able to drink at 18 there would

made for drinking. Ethanol, a specific type of alcohol, is used for many household items, such as, cleaning supplies or medicines but is highly poisonous and therefore not used in many other items. More commonly, alcohol is known for being used in drinks for those over the age of twenty one. After many debates, the argument “Should the drinking age be lowered?”, is still one of the most widely controversial topics. Many think the drinking age should be lowered to eighteen or even to the age of sixteen

students as well? There are many advocates for lowering the legal drinking age, and certain states have considered it as well. If eighteen-year-olds can serve in the military and get married, why can they not drink? The legal drinking age should not be lowered because studies show that traffic fatalities would increase, youth are not responsible enough, and younger bodies cannot handle alcohol consumption. Research shows that if the legal drinking age was lowered, traffic fatalities would increase

set their minimum drinking age to twenty one although exceptions do not exist on a state- by- state basis for consumption at home, under adult supervision, for mental necessity and other reasons. Supporters of lowering the minimum legal drinking age, which is 21 argue that it has not stopped teen drinking, and has instead pushed underage binge drinking leading into more health problems and life- endangering behavior by teens. Teens tend to not handle alcohol at such a young age. Other countries have

about lowering the legal drinking age. I wrote about this topic because it is very controversial and is a popular subject. The essay was quite challenging because I was fighting it and a lot of the reliable information, such as statistics, were going against my opinion. In my paper I think I did a good job of finding a fair compromise between the two sides by using what I researched to point out the pros and cons and coming to a solution. Although I took the side of lowering the legal drinking age

hand ,lowering the drinking age, we need to first understand how the drinking age of 21 was first put into place. The repeal of alcohol prohibition on December 5th, 1933, the 21st Amendment, allowed every state to arrange their own alcohol consumption laws. Then when the US passed the 26th Amendment on July 1st, 1971, which reduced the voting age to 18, multiple states lowered their minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) to 18, 19, or 20. While on the other hand 14 states kept their legal drinking age to

whether the drinking age should remain at 21 or should be lowered has become a very controversial topic. While there are some doubts on lowering the drinking age to 18, there are many pros as to why we should keep the drinking age at 21, especially in an underage drinking environment. The discussion will move from the possibilities of alcohol abuse and its percusion, to the loopholes the laws and legislations concerning the use of alcohol and the minimum legal age. The conflict between lowering the drinking

wasted night. Someone else’s bad judgment. Want to prevent this horrifying scene? Don’t lower the drinking age. The drinking age should not be lowered for many reasons. A few arguments against a lower drinking age are health, devastating car crashes, and the ripple impact on society. When teenagers drink, it’s mostly binge drinking, which is a lot of alcohol in a little amount of time. Binge drinking is terrible for teenagers’ health. It can cause cancer, brain damage, weak immune system, and vitamin

much higher if the legal drinking age was lowered to eighteen years old. By keeping the drinking age at twenty-one years old we would efficiently reduce the number of these tragic accidents. The minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) is a controversial issue over whether or not it should be lowered to the age of eighteen. It is shown that keeping the MLDA of twenty-one would benefit society in multiple ways. A MLDA of twenty-one was historically shown to be better than an age of eighteen, by showing

lower the drinking age?” “ These teens are old enough to know that they perfectly conscious when they do this stuff?” A lot of people also say, “ Even if they do it, nothing will happen to them.” I will be giving my opinion on this. First of all, I am completely against lowering the drinking age. I have three main reasons why I am against lowering the age. The first one, it gives the youth time to grow and mature. Second, I have had family and friends die because of drinking at a young age. And last